Tax Capacity of the Russian Federation Constituent Entities: Problems of Assessment and Unequal Distribution

  • N. M. SabitovaEmail author
  • Ch. M. Shavaleyeva
  • E. N. Lizunova
  • A. I. Khairullova
  • A. Zahariev
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics book series (SPBE)


The Russian Federation (RF) is among the countries with a high degree of fiscal centralization. Centralization is connected with the tax assignment system by government levels. The Tax Code of the Russian Federation defines a closed list of federal, regional and local taxes. Meanwhile, federal taxes constitute the core of the country’s tax system, while regional and local taxes account for a small share in total tax revenues. Therefore, regional and local taxes cannot be the basis for the RF constituent entities’ budgets and local budgets. The RF constituent entities’ tax capacity determines the opportunities for their economic development. However, due to uneven economic development, there is a significant differentiation in the level of RF constituent entities’ fiscal capacity, which is associated with their insufficient tax capacity. The purpose of the study is to analyze tax revenues by federal districts and the RF constituent entities in order to identify the factors that affect them, the degree of these revenues differentiation, the system of tax revenues distribution by government level as a basis for assessing the tax capacity in budget planning.


  1. Arcalean, C., Glomm, G., Schiopu, I., & Suedekum, J. (2010). Public budget composition, fiscal (de)centralization, and welfare. Canadian Journal of Economics, 43(3), 832–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arzaghi, M., & Henderson, J. V. (2005). Why countries are fiscally decentralizing. Journal of Public Economics, 89(7), 1157–1189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, R. M., & Smart, M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, 30(6), 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Data on forms of statistical tax reporting. (2018). Access mode:
  5. Desai, R. M., Freinkman, L., & Goldberg, I. (2005). Fiscal federalism in rentier regions: Evidence from Russia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 33(4), 814–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kioko, S. N., & Martell, C. R. (2012). Impact of state-Level tax and expenditure limits (TELs) on government revenues and aid to local 174 governments. Public Finance Review, 40(6), 736–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Musaeva, K. M., Zaidullaevna, A. A., & Bashirovna, A. E. (2015). Problems and ways of improvement of tax instruments as a factor in the growth of tax opportunities territories. Asian Social Science, 11(19), 290–297.Google Scholar
  8. Reayat, N., Ahmad, I., Khalil, J., & Rahim, T. (2014). Fiscal decentralisation: What does the international experience suggests. Life Science Journal, 11(7), 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Report on the form 1-NOM as of 01/01/2018. (2018). Access mode:
  10. Roschupkina, V. V. (2013). Modern concepts of formation and development of tax capacity of the region. Life Science Journal, 10(12), 742–745.Google Scholar
  11. Sabitova, N. M., Shavaleyeva, C. M., & Nikonova, E. N. (2015). Horizontal imbalances of Russian Federation budget system. Asian Social Science, 11(11), 248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sacchi, A., & Salotti, S. (2014). How regional inequality affects fiscal decentralisation: Accounting for the autonomy of subcentral governments. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(1), 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Velenteichyk, N. (2013). Congruence of interests of the center and regions in the course of intergovernmental relations regulation. Economic Annals-XXI, 5–6(2), 37–40.Google Scholar
  14. Vo, D. H. (2010). Economics of fiscal decentralization. Journal of Economic Surveys, 24(4), 657–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. M. Sabitova
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ch. M. Shavaleyeva
    • 1
  • E. N. Lizunova
    • 1
  • A. I. Khairullova
    • 1
  • A. Zahariev
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Management, Economics and FinanceKazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia
  2. 2.D. A. Tsenov Academy of EconomicsSvishtovBulgaria

Personalised recommendations