Advertisement

Investigation of Common Big Data Analytics and Decision-Making Requirements Across Diverse Precision Agriculture and Livestock Farming Use Cases

  • Spiros MouzakitisEmail author
  • Giannis Tsapelas
  • Sotiris Pelekis
  • Simos Ntanopoulos
  • Dimitris Askounis
  • Sjoukje Osinga
  • Ioannis N. Athanasiadis
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 554)

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present the investigation of common requirements and needs of users across a diverse set of precision agriculture and livestock farming use cases that was based on a series of interviews with experts and farmers. The requirements were based on nine interviews that were conducted in order to identify common requirements and challenges in terms of data collection and management, Big Data technologies, High Performance Computing infrastructure and decision making. The common requirements that derived from the interviews and user requirement analysis per use case can serve as basis for identifying functional and non-functional requirements of a technological solution of high re-usability, interoperability, adaptability and overall efficiency in terms of addressing common needs for precision agriculture and livestock farming.

Keywords

Precision agriculture Livestock farming Big data analytics Decision-making User requirements 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work has been co-funded by the CYBELE project, a European Commission research program under H2020-825355. We are particularly grateful to the interviewees from the nine CYBELE case study demonstrators.

References

  1. 1.
    Schimmelpfennig, D.: Farm profits and adoption of precision agriculture (No. 1477-2016-121190) (2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schimmelpfennig, D., Ebel, R.: Sequential adoption and cost savings from precision agriculture. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 41(1835-2016-149552), 97-115 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Janssen, S.J., et al.: Towards a new generation of agricultural system data, models and knowledge products: information and communication technology. Agric. Syst. 155, 200–212 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Srbinovska, M., Gavrovski, C., Dimcev, V., Krkoleva, A., Borozan, V.: Environmental parameters monitoring in precision agriculture using wireless sensor networks. J. Clean. Prod. 88, 297–307 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mahlein, A.K.: Plant disease detection by imaging sensors–parallels and specific demands for precision agriculture and plant phenotyping. Plant Dis. 100(2), 241–251 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vuran, M.C., Salam, A., Wong, R., Irmak, S.: Internet of underground things in precision agriculture: architecture and technology aspects. Ad Hoc Netw. 81, 160–173 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bendre, M.R., Thool, R.C., Thool, V.R.: Big data in precision agriculture: weather forecasting for future farming. In: 2015 1st International Conference on Next Generation Computing Technologies (NGCT), pp. 744–750. IEEE, September 2015Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keswani, B., et al.: Adapting weather conditions based IoT enabled smart irrigation technique in precision agriculture mechanisms. Neural Comput. Appl. 31(1), 277–292 (2019)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wolf, J., Bhandari, S., Raheja, A.: Unmanned aerial vehicles for precision agriculture in Orchard crops (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gevaert, C.M., Suomalainen, J., Tang, J., Kooistra, L.: Generation of spectral–temporal response surfaces by combining multispectral satellite and hyperspectral UAV imagery for precision agriculture applications. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 8(6), 3140–3146 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., Bogaardt, M.J.: Big data in smart farming–a review. Agric. Syst. 153, 69–80 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Heide, E.M.M., Veerkamp, R.F., van Pelt, M.L., Kamphuis, C., Athanasiadis, I., Ducro, B.J.: Comparing regression, naive Bayes, and random forest methods in the prediction of individual survival to second lactation in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 102(10), 9409–9421 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2019-1629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lant, M.: How to easily prioritize your agile stories (2010). https://michaellant.com/2010/05/21/how-to-easily-prioritize-your-agile-stories/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Decision Support Systems LaboratoryNational Technical University of AthensAthensGreece
  2. 2.Wageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations