Advertisement

Environmental Stewardship and Built Space

  • Ambe J. Njoh
Chapter
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

There has been a rapid expansion of built space leading to unprecedented levels of urbanization throughout the world in the recent past. This has been matched by the rapid shrinkage and fragmentation of natural areas and resources. However, there are many gaps in knowledge of the exact nature of these diametrically opposed phenomena and how to go about resolving the problems they engender. This book contributes to efforts to close these gaps. Defining built space broadly to include all human settlements, the book interrogates efforts to promote nature in built space in different regions of the world. This chapter lays the foundation for, and provides a thumb sketch of, the discussion in the book.

References

  1. Adams AE, Swisher ME, Monaghan KN (2007) Defining community food security. Document #AEC 383, Series of the Agricultural Education and Communication Department, IFAS Extension, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  2. Ananga EO, Njoh AJ, Ananga GO, Pappas C (2017) Examining the relationship between community participation and water handling hygiene practices in the informal neighborhoods of Kisumu, Kenya. Habitat International (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Apiplakul C, Wirojangud W, Ngang TK (2015) Development of community participation on water resource conflict management. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 186:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bas E (2013) The integrated framework for analysis of electrical supply chain using an integrated SWOT-fuzzy TOPSIS methodology combined with AHP: the case of Turkey. Electr Power Energy Syst 44:897–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beute F, de Kort YAW (2018) Thinking of nature: associations with natural versus urban environments and their relations to preference. J Landsc Res 44(4):374–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boakye MK, Akpor OB (2012) Community participation in water resources management in South Africa. Int J Environ Sci Dev 3(6):511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr G, Bloschl G, Loucks DP (2012) Evaluating participation in water resource management: a review. Water Resour Res 48(11).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WRO11662.
  8. Catron J, Stainback GA, Dwivedi P, Lhoka J (2013) Bioenergy development in Kentucky: a SWOT-ANP analysis. Forest Policy Econ 28:38–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deelstra T, Girardet H (2000) Urban agriculture and sustainable cities. In: Bakker N, Dubbeling M, Gundel S, Sabel-Koshella U, de Zeeuw H (eds) Growing cities, growing food: urban agriculture on the policy agenda. ZEL, Feldafing, pp 43–66Google Scholar
  10. Dungumaro EW, Madulu NF (2003) Public participation in integrated water resources management: the case of Tanzania. Phys Chem Earth 28:1009–1014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EEA (2019) Renewable energy in Europe: key for climate objectives but air pollution needs attention. European Environmental Agency. Briefing No. 13/2019Google Scholar
  12. FAO (2019) With micro-gardens, urban poor “grow their own.” urban and peri-urban horticulture. Factsheet 6. Retrieved on 30 July 2019 from: http://www.fao.org/ag/agp/greenercities/pdf/FS/UPH-FS-6.pdf
  13. Fuller RA, Irvine KN (2010) Interactions between people and nature in urban environments. In: Gaston KJ (ed) Urban ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 134–171.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511778483.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hathaway T (2010) What is driving dams in Africa. World Rivers Rev 25(4):5–5. (December 2010)Google Scholar
  16. Humphrey A (2005) SWOT analysis for management consulting. SRI Alumni Newsletter (SRI International) 1:2005Google Scholar
  17. Lamprecht M (2016) The role of the built environment in human life. Eur Spat Res Policy 23(2):65–78Google Scholar
  18. Mazzotti FJ, Morgenstern C (2014) A scientific framework for managing urban natural areas. Document No. SSWEC74, Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, UF/IFAS Extension, University of Florida IFAS Extension. Accessed 17 Apr 2017 at: http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/uw112
  19. Njoh AJ (2002) Barriers to community participation in development planning: lessons from the Mutengene (Cameroon) self-help water project. Commun Dev J 37(3):233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Njoh AJ (2006) Determinants of success in community self-help projects: the case of the Kumbo (Cameroon) water supply project. Int Dev Plan Rev 28(3):381–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Njoh AJ (2017) The SWOT Model’s utility in evaluating energy technology: illustrative application of a modified version to assess the sawdust Cookstove in sub-Saharan Africa. Renewable an Sustainable Energy Reviews 69:313–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Poundstone W (1993) Prisoner’s Dilemma. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Sseguya H, Mazur RE, Njuki JM, Owusu FY (2013) Determinants of participation and leadership in food security groups in Southeast Uganda: implications for development programs and policies. J Rural Commun Dev 8(1):77–97Google Scholar
  25. Swikepi C (2011) Community participation and food security in rural Zimbabwe: the case of Marange area in Mutare District. Unpublished Master’s thesis, University of Fort HareGoogle Scholar
  26. Vince G (2014) Adventures in the Anthropocene: a journey to the heart of the planet we made. Chatto & Windus, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Vince G (2015) Whom is nature for? Am Sch (November 15, 2019)Google Scholar
  28. Wright RT, Boorse DF (2017) Environmental science: toward a sustainable future. Pearson, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ambe J. Njoh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of GeosciencesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations