Advertisement

Elastic Modulus Measurement Through Ambient Response Method

  • José GranjaEmail author
  • Miguel Azenha
Chapter
  • 67 Downloads
Part of the Springer Tracts in Civil Engineering book series (SPRTRCIENG)

Abstract

Concrete endures strong evolution in its mechanical behaviour since casting, passing from a solid suspension to a structural material. It is extremely important to understand and be able to predict the structural behaviour of concrete since the beginning of the hardening process for a good structural design, particularly in regard to the development of self-induced stresses (due to heat of hydration and shrinkage). In order to collect data for the relevant phenomena that have been mentioned, it is important to have methods that allow continuous monitoring of the evolution of mechanical properties of concrete since very early ages, both in laboratory environment and ‘in-situ’. In such concern, an experimental method called EMM-ARM (Elasticity Modulus Measurement through Ambient Response Method) was proposed in 2009, which is based on the modal identification of a composite beam during the curing period of concrete, allowing the continuous measurement of the E-modulus of the tested material (e.g. concrete, mortar, cement paste) since casting. This chapter provides an overview of EMM-ARM principles, evolution through the last decade, as well as several examples of application and validation.

Keywords

Elastic modulus Continuous monitoring Cement-based materials Early age Modal identification 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by FEDER funds through the Operational Program for Competitiveness Factors—COMPETE and National Funds through FCT—Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology under the project IntegraCrete PTDC/ECM‐EST/1056/2014, as well to the Research Unit ISISE (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007633). The first author also acknowledges the Ph.D. grant SFRH/BD/80338/2011 provided by FCT. The authors would also like to acknowledge the benefits of cross-linking research through the network of COST Action TU1404 “Towards the next generation of standards for service life of cement-based materials and structures” (www.tu1404.eu).

References

  1. ASTM. (2002). Standard Test Method for Fundamental Transverse, Longitudinal, and Torsional Resonant Frequencies of Concrete Specimens. C215. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume: 04.02: American Society for Testing and Materials.Google Scholar
  2. Azenha, M. (2009). Numerical Simulation of the structural behaviour of concrete since its early ages. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto.Google Scholar
  3. Azenha, M., Faria, R., Magalhães, F., Ramos, L., & Cunha, Á. (2012a). Measurement of the E-modulus of cement pastes and mortars since casting, using a vibration based technique. Materials and Structures, 45, 81–92.Google Scholar
  4. Azenha, M., Ferreira, C., Silva, J., Correia, A. G., Aguilar, R., & Ramos, L. F. (2011). Continuous stiffness monitoring of cemented sand through resonant frequency. In: D.-H. Chen, J.-R. Chang, & M. Zaman M (Eds.), Emerging technologies for material, design, rehabilitation, and inspection of roadway pavements (pp. 174–183). Hunan, China.Google Scholar
  5. Azenha, M., Magalhães, F., Faria, R., & Cunha, Á. (2010). Measurement of concrete E-modulus evolution since casting: A novel method based on ambient vibration. Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 1096–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Azenha, M., Ramos, L. F., Aguilar, R., & Granja, J. L. (2012b). Continuous monitoring of concrete E-modulus since casting based on modal identification: A case study for in situ application. Cement and Concrete Composites, 34, 881890.Google Scholar
  7. Bentz, D. P. (2008). A review of early-age properties of cement-based materials. Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boulay, C., & Colson, A. (1979). Un extensomètre à béton éliminant l’influence des déformations transversales sur la mesure des déformations longitudinales. Materials and Structures, 14, 35–38.Google Scholar
  9. Boulay, C., Crespini, M., Carette, J., & Staquet, S. (2012). Elastic properties of concrete at early age: Monitoring of the E-modulus and the poisson’s ratio with cyclic loadings and ultrasonic measurements. In Structural Faults and Repair2012 (p. 11), France.Google Scholar
  10. Boulay, C., Staquet, S., Azenha, M., Deraemaeker, A., Crespini, M., Carette, J., et al. (2013a). Monitoring elastic properties of concrete since very early age by means of cyclic loadings, ultrasonic measurements, natural resonant frequency of composite beam (EMM-ARM) and with smart aggregates. In J. G. M. V. Mier, G. Ruiz, C. Andrade, R. C. Yu, & X. X. Zhang (Eds.) VIII International Conference on Fracture Mechanics of Concrete and Concrete Structures (p. 14). FraMCoS-8, Toledo, Spain.Google Scholar
  11. Boulay, C., Staquet, S., Delsaute, B., Carette, J., Crespini, M., Yazoghli-Marzouk, O., et al. (2013b). How to monitor the modulus of elasticity of concrete, automatically since the earliest age? Materials and Structures, 47, 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boumiz, A., Vernet, C., & Tenoudji, F. C. (1996). Mechanical properties of cement pastes and mortars at early ages: Evolution with time and degree of hydration. Advanced Cement Based Materials, 3, 94–106.Google Scholar
  13. Caetano, E. (1992). Identificação experimental de parâmetros dinâmicos em sistemas estruturais. MSc: Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto.Google Scholar
  14. Caetano, E. (2000). Dynamic of cable-stayed bridges: Experimental assessment of cable-structure interaction. Ph.D. thesis, University of Porto.Google Scholar
  15. Carette, J., Dumoulin, C., Karaiskos, G., Staquet, S., & Deraemaeker, A. (2012). Monitoring of the E-modulus in early age concrete since setting time with embedded piezoelectric transducers. In Conference: Structural Faults & Repair, 14th International Conference and Exhibition (pp. 1–7), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Carette, J., & Staquet, S. (2015). Monitoring the setting process of mortars by ultrasonic P and S-wave transmission velocity measurement. Construction and Building Materials, 94, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Charpin, L., Sanahuja, J., Tran, N. C., Petit, L., Bremond, O., Montalvo, J., et al. (2016). Multiscale modeling of hydration, elasticity and creep of VeRCoRs concrete. Focus on creep characteristic times. In Technological innovations in nuclear civil engineering (TINCE 2016).Google Scholar
  18. Chen, C.-W., Je-Nan, J., & Lee, G. (1993). Frequency domain state-space system identification. In American Control Conference (pp. 3057–3061), 2–4 June 1993.Google Scholar
  19. Chengju, G. (1989). Maturity of concrete: method for predicting early-stage strength. ACI Materials Journal, 86, 341–353.Google Scholar
  20. Delsaute, B., Boulay, C., Granja, J., Carette, J., Azenha, M., Dumoulin, C., et al. (2016). Testing concrete E-modulus at very early ages through several techniques: an inter-laboratory comparison. Strain, 52, 91–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Delsaute, B., Staquet, S., & Boulay, C. (2012). Monitoring of the creep and the relaxation behaviour of concrete since setting time. In SSCS 2012 (Numerical modeling—Strategies for sustainable concrete structures).Google Scholar
  22. Dotson, C. (2015). Fundamentals of dimensional metrology. Boston, USA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  23. Dunham, M. R., Rush, A. S., & Hanson, J. H. (2007). Effects of induced vibrations on early age concrete. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 21, 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ewins, D. J. (2000). Modal testing: Theory, practice, and application. Research Studies Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fernandes, J. F., Bittencourt, T. N., & Helene, P. (2011). Concrete subjected to vibrations in early-ages. Ibracon Structures and Materials, 4, 592–609.Google Scholar
  26. Fernandes, P., Granja, J. L., Benedetti, A., Sena-Cruz, J., & Azenha, M. (2015). Quality control and monitoring of NSM CFRP systems: E-modulus evolution of epoxy adhesive and its relation to the pull-out force. Composites Part B Engineering, 75, 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fernandes, P., Granja, J., Sena-Cruz, J., Azenha, M., & Benedetti, A. (2014). A new methodology for assisting quality control of NSM-CFRP systems since very early ages. In R. El-Hacha, A. Rteil, A. Fam, D. Chen, F. Oudah, J.-F. Chen, K. Harris, K. Abdelrahman, & T. Tannert (Eds) The 7th International Conference on FRP Composites in Civil Engineering. Canada: Vancouver.Google Scholar
  28. Garijo, L., Azenha, M., Ramesh, M., Lourenço, P. B., & Ruiz, G. (2019). Stiffness evolution of natural hydraulic lime mortars at early ages measured through EMM-ARM. Construction and Building Materials, 216, 405–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Giner, V. T., Ivorra, S., Baeza, F. J., Zornoza, E., & Ferrer, B. (2011). Silica fume admixture effect on the dynamic properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 25, 3272–3277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Granja, J. L. (2011). Experimental evaluation of the elastic modulus of cementitious materials at early ages (in Portuguese). M.Sc. thesis, University of Minho.Google Scholar
  31. Granja, J. (2016). Continuous characterization of stiffness of cement‐based materials: experimental analysis and micro-mechanics modeling. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minho.Google Scholar
  32. Granja, J., & Azenha, M. (2015). Continuous monitoring of concrete mechanical properties since early age to support construction phasing. In Mechanics and physics of creep, shrinkage, and durability of concrete and concrete structures, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
  33. Granja, J., & Azenha, M. (2017). Towards a robust and versatile method for monitoring E-modulus of concrete since casting: Enhancements and extensions of EMM-ARM. Strain, 53, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Granja, J. L., Azenha, M., & Ferreira, C. (2013). Evaluation of the E-modulus of cement paste since fresh state based on resonant frequency: comparison with other methodologies and maturity studies. In 1st International RILEM Conference on Rheology and Processing of Construction Materials and the 7th RILEM Conference on Self-Compacting Concrete.Google Scholar
  35. Granja, J., Azenha, M., Sousa, C. D., & Ferreira, C. (2014). Comparison between different experimental techniques for stiffness monitoring of cement pastes. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology, 12, 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Granja, J. L., Fernandes, P., Benedetti, A., Azenha, M., & Sena-Cruz, J. (2015). Monitoring the early stiffness development in epoxy adhesives for structural strengthening. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 59, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hassan, A. M. T., & Jones, S. W. (2012). Non-destructive testing of ultra high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC): A feasibility study for using ultrasonic and resonant frequency testing techniques. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. He, J., & Fu, Z. F. (2001). Modal analysis. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  39. Hong, S., & Park, S.-K. (2015). Effect of vehicle-induced vibrations on early-age concrete during bridge widening. Construction and Building Materials, 77, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. JCGM. (2012). International vocabulary of metrology—Basic and general concepts and associated terms (VIM, 3rd ed., p. 200). JCGM.Google Scholar
  41. Jin, X., & Li, Z. (2001). Dynamic Property determination for early-age concrete. ACI Materials Journal, 98, 365–370.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, R. (1949). A non-destructive method of testing concrete during hardening. Concrete and Constructional Engineering, 44, 127–128.Google Scholar
  43. Juang, J.-N. (1994). Applied system identification. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. Juang, J. N., & Pappa, R. S. (1985). An eigensystem realization algorithm for modal parameter identification and model reduction. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 8, 620–627.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Juang, J. N., & Suzuki, H. (1988). An eigensystem realization algorithm in frequency domain for modal parameter identification. Journal of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, 110, 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kolluru, S. V., Popovics, J. S., & Shah, S. P. (2000). Determining elastic properties of concrete using vibrational resonance frequencies of standard test cylinders. Cement Concrete and Aggregates, 22, 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lee, K.-M., Kim, D.-S., & Kim, J.-S. (1997). Determination of dynamic Young’s modulus of concrete at early ages by impact resonance test. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 1, 11–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Maia, L., Azenha, M., Faria, R. & Figueiras, J. (2011a). Influence of the cementitious paste composition on the E-modulus and heat of hydration evolutions. Cement and Concrete Research, 41, 799–807.Google Scholar
  49. Maia, L., Azenha, M., Geiker, M., & Figueiras, J. (2011b). Describing paste E-modulus evolution of commercial cements and the relationship with volume solids formation.Google Scholar
  50. Maia, L., Azenha, M., Geiker, M., & Figueiras, J. (2012a). E-modulus evolution and its relation to solids formation of pastes from commercial cements. Cement and Concrete Research, 42, 928–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Maia, L., Figueiras, H., Nunes, S., Azenha, M., & Figueiras, J. (2012b). Influence of shrinkage reducing admixtures on distinct SCC mix compositions. Construction and Building Materials, 35, 304–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKelvey, T., Akcay, H., & Ljung, L. (1996). Subspace-based multivariable system identification from frequency response data. Automatic Control, IEEE Transactions on, 41, 960–979.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Oppenheim, A. V., Schafer, R. W., & Buck, J. R. (1989). Discrete-time signal processing. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs, USA: Prentice-Hall.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. Overschee, P. V., & Moor, B. D. (1996). Subspace identification for linear systems: Theory, implementation, applications. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parrott, L. J. (1990). A review os methods to determine the moisture conditions in concrete. British Cement Association Publication C/7.Google Scholar
  56. Peeters, B., & de Roeck, G. (2001). Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis: A review. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, 123, 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pintelon, R., Guillaume, P., Rolain, Y., Schoukens, J., & van Hamme, H. (1994). Parametric identification of transfer functions in the frequency domain-a survey. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 39, 2245–2260.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Powers, T. C. (1938). Measuring Young’s modulus of elasticity by means of sonic vibrations. ASTM Proceedings, 38, 460–467.Google Scholar
  59. Rainieri, C., & Fabbrocino, G. (2014). Operational modal analysis of civil engineering structures: An introduction and guide for applications. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reinhardt, H. W., & Grosse, C. U. (2004). Continuous monitoring of setting and hardening of mortar and concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 18, 145–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ren, W.-X., & Zong, Z.-H. (2004). Output-only modal parameter identification of civil engineering structures. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 17, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reynders, E. (2012). System identification methods for (operational) modal analysis: Review and comparison. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 19, 51–124.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rilem. (1975). Modulus of elasticity of concrete in compression. CPC 8. RILEM TC14-CPC.Google Scholar
  64. Rodrigues, J. (2004). Stochastic modal identification, analysis methods and applications in civil engineering structures (in Portuguese). Ph.D. thesis, Engineering Faculty of University of Porto.Google Scholar
  65. Silva, J. (2010). Contribuição para o estudo do tratamento de solos: Avaliação da Deformabilidade. Dissertação de mestrado: Universidade do Minho.Google Scholar
  66. Silva, J., Azenha, M., Correia, A. G., & Ferreira, C. (2013). Continuous stiffness assessment of cement-stabilised soils from early age. Géotechnique, 63, 1419–1432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Silva, J., Azenha, M., Correia, A. G., & Granja, J. (2014). Continuous monitoring of sand-cement stiffness since layer compaction with a resonant frequency based method: issues on mould geometry and sampling. Soils and Foundations, 54, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, X., & Subramaniam, K. V. (2011). Ultrasonic monitoring of capillary porosity and elastic properties in hydrating cement paste. Cement and Concrete Composites, 33, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Welch, P. D. (1967). The use of fast Fourier transforms for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics, 15, 70–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhao, H., Huang, D., Wang, X., & Chen, X. (2014). Dynamic elastic modulus of cement paste at early age based on nondestructive test and multiscale prediction model. Journal of Wuhan University of Technology-Material Science Edition, 29, 321–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil Engineering, School of EngineeringISISE—Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering, University of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations