Advertisement

Corporate Transparency and Internal Audit/Control as Investor Protection Tools in the Opaque Russian Market

  • Andrei B. AnkudinovEmail author
Chapter
  • 26 Downloads
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

The chapter looks into the problem of enhancing financial performance and efficiency of business processes of Russian companies through improved corporate transparency and efficient internal audit function. It also contains an overview of empirical studies carried out by the author and his research associates in the field of specific determinants of shareholder value creation. The latter include, among others, corporate transparency rating as well as existence of internal audit service in company organizational structure.

For the purpose of empirical analysis of relation between standards of corporate governance and financial efficiency we suggest an original corporate transparency rating tailored specifically for the Russian market. The rating is comprised of 39 indicators reflecting the degree of disclosure of information, relevant for all major stakeholder groups. Alongside the obtained aggregate index some other indicators of corporate governance quality were included into the model, such as the board membership and the number of independent directors. Econometric modeling reveals positive relation between the level of corporate transparency and the market-to-book ratio for the publicly traded Russian companies.

In addition we assess the role of internal audit in proper investor protection and shareholder value creation and investigate the determinants of existence of internal audit departments in companies’ organizational structure. The research results reveal that the existence of internal audit service in the company structure is positively related to shareholder value creation.

However well do our empirical results fit into the line with the popular discourse, they are of preliminary nature and should be viewed with certain caution.

References

  1. Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K., & Nachum, L. (2016). Does having women on boards create value? The impact of societal perceptions and corporate governance in emerging markets. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3), 466–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Haddad, W., Alzurqan, S. T., & Al_Sufy, F. J. (2011). The effect of corporate governance on the performance of Jordanian industrial companies: An empirical study on Amman stock exchange. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 55–69.Google Scholar
  3. Aljifri, K. (2008). Annual report disclosure in a developing country: The case of the UAE. Advances in Accounting, 24, 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alsaeed, K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 7(1), 310–321.Google Scholar
  5. Ankudinov, A. B. (2017). Kriterii ocenki effektivnosti sistemy vnutrennego kontrolja. Jekonomicheskij Vestnik Respubliki Tatarstan. [Efficiency criteria of internal control system. Economic bulletin of the Republic of Tatarstan] (in Russian), 1, 52–56.Google Scholar
  6. Ankudinov, A. B., & Markhanova, E. S. (2018). Otsenka effektivnosti vnutrennego audita v sisteme korporativnogo upravleniya: empiricheskiy analiz po dannym rossiyskih kompaniy. [Assessment of internal audit efficiency in corporate governance: An empirical analysis of the Russian Companies’ Data]. Uchet.Analiz.Audit = Accounting.Analysis.Auditing, 1(5), 18–29 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  7. Ararat, M., Black, B. S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2017). The effect of corporate governance on firm value and profitability: Time-series evidence from Turkey. Emerging Markets Review, 30, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Balasubramanian, N., Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. (2010). The relation between firm-level corporate governance and market value: A case study of India. Emerging Markets Review, 11, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beasley, M. S., Carcello, J. V., Hermanson, D. R., & Lapides, P. D. (2000). Fraudulent financial reporting: Considerations of industry traits and corporate governance mechanisms. Accounting Horizons, 14(December), 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Black, B. S. (2001). The corporate governance behavior and market value of Russian firms. Emerging Markets Review, 2, 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Black, B. S., & Khanna, V. S. (2007). Can corporate governance reforms increase firms’ market values? Event study evidence from India. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 749–796.Google Scholar
  12. Black, B. S., & Kim, W. C. (2012). The effect of board structure on firm value: A multiple identification strategies approach using Korean data. Journal of Financial Economics, 104, 203–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. C. (2006a). Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from the Korean market. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 22, 366–413.Google Scholar
  14. Black, B. S., Love, I., & Rachinsky, A. (2006b). Corporate governance indices and firms’ market values: Time series evidence from Russia. Emerging Markets Review, 7, 361–379.Google Scholar
  15. Black, B. S., Woochan, K., Hasung, J., & Kyung-Suh, P. (2009). How corporate governance affects firm value: Evidence on channels from Korea. http://ssrn.com/abstract=844744
  16. Black, B. S., de Carvalho, A. G., & Gorga, É. C. R. (2012). What matters and for which firms for corporate governance in emerging markets?: Evidence from Brazil (and other BRIK countries). Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(18), 934–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Black, B. S., Kim, W. C., Jang, H., & Park, K. S. (2015). How corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence on a self-dealing channel from a natural experiment in Korea. Journal of Banking & Finance, 51, 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Braga-Alves, M., & Shastri, K. (2011). Corporate governance, valuation, and performance: Evidence from a voluntary market reform in Brazil. Financial Management, 40, 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheung, Y.-L., Connelly, T. J., Limpaphayom, P., & Zhou, L. (2007). Do investors really value corporate governance? Evidence from the Hong Kong market. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 18, 86–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheung, Y.-L., Connelly, T., Jiang, P., Limpaphayom, P., & Zhou, L. (2011). Does corporate governance predict future performance? Evidence from Hong Kong. Financial Management, 40, 159–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Christopher, J., Sarens, G., & Leung, P. (2009). A critical analysis of the independence of the internal audit function: Evidence from Australia. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22(2), 200–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ciftci, I., Tatoglu, E., Wood, G., Demirbag, M., & Zaim, S. (2019). Corporate governance and firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence from Turkey. International Business Review, 28, 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Claessens, S., & Fan, J. (2002). Corporate governance in Asia: A survey. International Review of Finance, 3(2), 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Claessens, S., & Yurtoglu, B. B. (2013). Corporate governance in emerging markets: A survey. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Connelly, T., Limpaphayom, P., & Nagarajan, N. J. (2012). Form versus substance: The effect of ownership structure and corporate governance on firm value in Thailand. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(6), 1722–1743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Connelly, T., Limpaphayom, P., Hien, T., Nguyen, T., & Tran, D. (2017). A tale of two cities: Economic development, corporate governance and firm value in Vietnam. Research in International Business and Finance, 42, 102–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coombs, H., & Tayib, M. (1998). Developing a disclosure index for local authority published accounts – A comparative study of local authority published financial reports between the UK and Malaysia. Paper presented at the Asian Pacific Interdisciplinary Research in Accounting Conference in Osaka, August.Google Scholar
  28. Duc, V., & Phan, T. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Open University, Ho Chi Minh City, 19.Google Scholar
  29. Ege, M. S. (2015). Does internal audit function quality deter management misconduct? The Accounting Review, 90(2), 495–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Enikolopov, R., Petrova, M., & Stepanov, S. (2014). Firm value in crisis: Effects of firm-level transparency and country-level institutions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 46, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fadzil, F. H., Haron, H., & Jantan, M. (2005). Internal auditing practices and internal control system. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(8), 844–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Feng, M., Li, C., McVay, S., & Skaife, H. (2015). Does ineffective internal control over financial reporting affect a firm’s operations? Evidence from firms’ inventory management. The Accounting Review, 90(2), 529–557.Google Scholar
  33. Firth, M. (1979). The impact of size, stock market listing, and auditors on voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports. Accounting and Business Research, 9(36), 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodwin-Stewart, J., & Kent, P. (2006). Relation between external audit fees, audit committee characteristics and internal audit. Accounting and Finance, 46, 387–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ho, S., & Hutchinson, M. (2010). Internal audit department characteristics/activities and audit fees: Some evidence from Hong Kong firms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19, 121–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jiang, L., Messier Jr., W. F., & Wood, D. A. (2017). The association between internal audit consulting services and firm performance (July 5). Retrived from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2882787 or  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2882787
  37. Kouwenberg, R. R. P. (2006). Does voluntary corporate governance code adoption increase firm value in emerging markets? Evidence from Thailand. Retrived from http://ssrn.com/abstract=958580
  38. KPMG. (2011). Ekspertno-analititcheskii doklad “Praktiki korporativnogo upravlenija v Rossii: opredelenije granits natsionalnoi modeli” [Analytical Report “Corporate governance practices in Russia: Identification of boundaries of the national model”]: Association of managers, KPMG in Russia and CIS. (In Russian). Retrived from www.kpmg.com
  39. KPMG Peat Marwick. (1999). 1998 Fraud survey. New York: KPMG Peat Marwick.Google Scholar
  40. Kuznecovs, M., & Pal, S. (2012). Does corporate governance reform necessarily boost firm performance? Recent evidence from Russia. IZA Discussion Paper, 6519. Retrived from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2051362
  41. Leal, R. P. C., & Carvalhal da Silva, A. (2007). Corporate governance and value in Brazil (and in Chile). In A. Chong & Lopez-de-Silanes (Eds.), Investor protection and corporate governance – Firm level evidence across Latin America (pp. 213–287). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Lei, A. C. H., & Song, F. M. (2012). Board structure, corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Hong Kong. Applied Financial Economics, 22, 1289–1303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Limpaphayom, P., & Connelly, J. T. (2004). Review of corporate governance in Asia: Corporate governance in Thailand. Bangkok: Thai Institute of Directors Association.Google Scholar
  44. OECD. (2015). G20/OECD principles of corporate governance. Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264236882-en CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rossijskij obzor jekonomicheskih prestuplenij za 2016 god [Russian Economic Crime Survey 2016], Retrived from www.pwc.ru/ru/forensic-services (in Russian).
  46. Saravanan, P. (2012). Corporate governance and company performance – Study with reference to manufacturing firms in India (pp. 1–22). Rajiv Gandhi Indian Institute of Management. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2063677 and  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2063677
  47. Sarkar, J., Sarkar, S., & Sen, K. (2012). A corporate governance index for large listed companies in India. Retrived from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2055091
  48. The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation (2017) International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF), The Institute of Internal Auditors Research Foundation. Florida, USA, January 2011, 2013, 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kazan Federal UniversityKazanRussia

Personalised recommendations