Abstract
This paper deals with the study of main directions and conceptual approaches in the field of legal groundwork for the electronic dispute resolution system, aiming for ensuring the proper protection of rights of individuals and legal entities under current conditions of digitization of economic relations. Special attention is paid to the analysis of innovative approaches in the civil and criminal fields of dispute resolution, the degree of their adaptivity to the contemporary needs of digital society, including the trends of decentralization, digital neutrality and provision of cybersecurity.
The authors carried out a comparative analysis of regulatory legal acts of states with a high level of economic development. The main conclusions that were drawn following the results of the presentation of materials in this paper can be presented in a structured fashion as follows:
-
globally, primarily in a number of the largest economies of the world, particularly those that are part of the G7, not only in arbitration courts, but also in state courts, there are trends aimed at optimization of procedures for the resolution of disputes (legal conflicts), including by means of the implementation of legitimate judicial innovative Internet technologies by the parties, the progressive and steady development of which significantly affects the development of the practice of world and national tribunals, which are also based on the highly active use of alternative mechanisms in the form of remote electronic technologies that were called remote communication technologies;
-
in many CIS member states, the engineering of a smart model of justice is gradually and nicely projected onto public law institutions, primarily criminal law, and has not yet touched on all types of legal proceedings by means of which justice is rendered, usually being adapted in the procedures of resolution of economic and civil disputes;
-
as of today, Russia is at the stage of development of fundamental principles of the concept of online dispute resolution so that such form of dispute resolution became an everyday routine, both in Russian practice and in relationship between Russia and its foreign contracting parties, which intrinsically requires taking actions that were suggested by the authors and are aimed at improvement of legal groundwork for a legal dispute resolution mechanism considered in the paper so as to make such form accessible to interested parties beyond domestic practice in the soonest possible time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute settlement for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EU) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on Consumer ADR). https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2f3efba7-fb97-41b2-953a-69c6080dfbcc/. Accessed 26 June 2019
Official Records of the General Assembly. 65th Session, Supplement No. 17 (A/65/17), para. 257, New York (2010)
Regulation (EU) No 524/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on Online Dispute Settlement for Consumer Disputes and Amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Regulation on Consumer ODR). OJ L 165, pp. 1–12, 18 June 2013
Avdyev, M.A.: Online dispute resolution services: selected cases. Sovremennye Tekhnologii Upravleniya 8(56) (2015). https://sovman.ru/article/5601/. Accessed 26 June 2019
Galkovskaya, N.G.: Online arbitration as a means of resolution of cross-border economic disputes. Bull. Tomsk State Univ. Pravo 24, 133–147 (2017)
Treaty on the Eurasian Economic Union of May 29, 2014. http://www.eaeunion.org/. Accessed 24 June 2019
Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 1406 of December 27, 2012. On the federal target program “Development of the Judicial System of Russia for 2013–2020”. Legis. Bull. Russ. Fed. 1, 13 (2013)
Resolution of Judicial Council of the Russian Federation No. 60 of 16.11.2001. Concerning the concept of information policy of judiciary system, LICS “KonsultantPlius”
Order of Justice Department under the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 197 of 16.09.2010. On approval of the Regulation on the management and procedure for ensuring the functioning of complexes of automation facilities of the State Automated System of the Russian Federation “Pravosudie” (“Justice”). LICS “KonsultantPlius”
Decision of the Supreme Eurasian Economic Council No. 12 of October 11, 2017. On the main directions for the implementation of the Digital Agenda of the Eurasian Economic Union until 2025. http://www.eaeunion.org/. Accessed 24 June 2019
Decision of the Board of the Eurasian Economic Commission No. 9 of June 9, 2015. On the methodology of analysis, optimization, harmonization and description of general processes within the framework of the Eurasian Economic Union. http://www.eaeunion.org/. Accessed 24 June 2019
Decision of the Council of CIS State Leaders of November 21, 2014. On assigning the status of the back-up organization of the member states of the Commonwealth of Independent States providing methodological as well as organizational and technical support in the field of information telecommunication technology to the JSC “Natsionalny Infokommunikatsionny Kholding “Zerde” (the Republic of Kazakhstan)”. https://www.zerde.gov.kz/upload/iblock/025/bazovaya_organizaciya_reshenie.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2019
The Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation No. 174-FZ of 18.12.2001. Legis. Bull. Russ. Fed. 52(Part 1), 4921 (2001)
Federal Law No. 262-FZ of 22.12.2008. On the provision of access to information on the activity of courts in the Russian Federation. Legis. Bull. Russ. Fed. 52(Part 1), 6217 (2008)
Federal Law No. 220-FZ of 23.06.2016. Concerning the introduction of amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation regarding the use of electronic documents in the activity of judicial authorities. Legis. Bull. Russ. Fed 26(Ч. I), 3889 (2016)
Tsirina, M.A.: Main directions of creation of the electronic system of alternative dispute resolution mechanisms. Administrativnoe Pravo i Protsess 4, 53–56 (2019)
Tsirina, M.A.: Issues of legal regulation of dispute resolution in the field of e-commerce (issues of online settlement of conflicts). In: Semilyutina, N.G., Ternovaya, O.A. (eds.) Legal Regulation of e-Commerce in Foreign Countries. A Monograph, vol. 201, pp. 180–280. The Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law, Moscow (2019)
Shamszoda, A.S.: The use of the model legislative acts and recommendations of the Inter-Parliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the lawmaking activity of the Parliament of the Republic of Tajikistan. Bull. IPA CIS 1, 43–47 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zul’fugarzade, T.E., Tsirina, M.A., Semykina, O.I. (2020). Improvement of Legal Groundwork for the Online Dispute Resolution System. In: Popkova, E., Sergi, B. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Anthropogenic Nature vs. Social Origin. ISC Conference - Volgograd 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1100. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_87
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39319-9_87
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-39318-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-39319-9
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)