Advertisement

Development and Operation of Trustworthy Smart IoT Systems: The ENACT Framework

  • Nicolas FerryEmail author
  • Jacek Dominiak
  • Anne Gallon
  • Elena González
  • Eider Iturbe
  • Stéphane Lavirotte
  • Saturnino Martinez
  • Andreas Metzger
  • Victor Muntés-Mulero
  • Phu H. Nguyen
  • Alexander Palm
  • Angel Rego
  • Erkuden Rios
  • Diego Riviera
  • Arnor Solberg
  • Hui Song
  • Jean-Yves Tigli
  • Thierry Winter
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12055)

Abstract

To unleash the full potential of IoT, it is critical to facilitate threation and operation of trustworthy Smart IoT Systems (SIS). Software development and delivery of SIS would greatly benefit from DevOps as devices and IoT services requirements for reliability, quality, security and safety are paramount. However, DevOps practices are far from widely adopted in the IoT, in particular, due to a lack of key enabling tools. In last year paper at DevOps’18, we presented the ENACT research roadmap that identified the critical challenges to enable DevOps in the realm of trustworthy SIS. In this paper, we present the ENACT DevOps Framework as our current realization of these methods and tools.

Keywords

DevOps Internet-of-Things Trustworthiness 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Commission’s H2020 Programme under grant agreement numbers 780351 (ENACT).

References

  1. 1.
    Abowd, G.D., Dey, A.K., Brown, P.J., Davies, N., Smith, M., Steggles, P.: Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness. In: Gellersen, H.-W. (ed.) HUC 1999. LNCS, vol. 1707, pp. 304–307. Springer, Heidelberg (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48157-5_29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blair, G., Bencomo, N., France, R.: Models@run.time. IEEE Comput. 42(10), 22–27 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cito, J., Wettinger, J., Lwakatare, L.E., Borg, M., Li, F.: Feedback from operations to software development—a devops perspective on runtime metrics and logs. In: Bruel, J.-M., Mazzara, M., Meyer, B. (eds.) DEVOPS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11350, pp. 184–195. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ferry, N., Chauvel, F., Song, H., Rossini, A., Lushpenko, M., Solberg, A.: CloudMF: model-driven management of multi-cloud applications. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. (TOIT) 18(2), 16 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferry, N., Nguyen, P.H.: Towards model-based continuous deployment of secure IoT systems. In: 1st International Workshop on DevOps@MODELS (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferry, N., et al.: Genesis: continuous orchestration and deployment of smart IoT systems. In: 2019 IEEE 43rd Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), vol. 1, pp. 870–875 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2019.00127
  7. 7.
    Ferry, N., et al.: ENACT: development, operation, and quality assurance of trustworthy smart IoT systems. In: Bruel, J.-M., Mazzara, M., Meyer, B. (eds.) DEVOPS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11350, pp. 112–127. Springer, Cham (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06019-0_9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K., O’Sullivan, R., O’Brien, D.: Scaling agile methods to regulated environments: an industry case study. In: International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2013, pp. 863–872. IEEE Press (2013). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2486788.2486906
  9. 9.
    Griffor, E.R., Greer, C., Wollman, D.A., Burns, M.J.: Framework for cyber-physical systems: volume 1, overview. Technical report (2017)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Humble, J., Farley, D.: Continuous Delivery: Reliable Software Releases Through Build, Test, and Deployment Automation. Addison-Wesley Professional, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Künzler, F., Kramer, J.N., Kowatsch, T.: Efficacy of mobile context-aware notification management systems: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. In: 2017 IEEE 13th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob), pp. 131–138. IEEE (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Morin, B., Fleurey, F., Husa, K.E., Barais, O.: A generative middleware for heterogeneous and distributed services. In: 19th International ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on Component-Based Software Engineering (CBSE), pp. 107–116. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    NESSI: Software continuum: Recommendations for ICT Work Programme 2018+. Nessi report (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nguyen, P.H., et al.: Advances in deployment and orchestration approaches for IoT - a systematic review. In: 2019 IEEE International Congress on Internet of Things (ICIOT), pp. 53–60, July 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIOT.2019.00021
  15. 15.
    Nguyen, P.H., et al.: The preliminary results of a mapping study of deployment and orchestration for IoT. In: Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2019, pp. 2040–2043. ACM, New York (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3297280.3297617. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3297280.3297617
  16. 16.
    Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Context aware computing for the internet of things: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 16(1), 414–454 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rios, E., et al.: Service level agreement-based GDPR compliance and security assurance in (multi) cloud-based systems. IET Software (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    da Silva, A.C.F., Breitenbücher, U., Képes, K., Kopp, O., Leymann, F.: OpenTOSCA for IoT: automating the deployment of IoT applications based on the mosquitto message broker. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on the Internet of Things, pp. 181–182. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taivalsaari, A., Mikkonen, T.: A roadmap to the programmable world: software challenges in the IoT era. IEEE Softw. 34(1), 72–80 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Womack, J., Jones, D.: Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation, Revised and Updated. Free Press (2003). https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=l8hWAAAAYAAJ

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Ferry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jacek Dominiak
    • 4
  • Anne Gallon
    • 3
  • Elena González
    • 4
  • Eider Iturbe
    • 6
  • Stéphane Lavirotte
    • 2
  • Saturnino Martinez
    • 6
  • Andreas Metzger
    • 5
  • Victor Muntés-Mulero
    • 4
  • Phu H. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Alexander Palm
    • 5
  • Angel Rego
    • 6
  • Erkuden Rios
    • 6
  • Diego Riviera
    • 7
  • Arnor Solberg
    • 8
  • Hui Song
    • 1
  • Jean-Yves Tigli
    • 2
  • Thierry Winter
    • 3
  1. 1.SINTEF DigitalOsloNorway
  2. 2.Université Côte d’Azur, CNRS, I3SSophia AntipolisFrance
  3. 3.EVIDIANLes Clayes-sous-BoisFrance
  4. 4.Beawre Digital SLBarcelonaSpain
  5. 5.Paluno (The Ruhr Institute for Software Technology)University of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  6. 6.Fundación Tecnalia Research & InnovationDerioSpain
  7. 7.MontimageParisFrance
  8. 8.Tellu IoT ASOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations