Advertisement

Physical Properties of Miscanthus Grass and Wheat Straw as Bedding Materials for Dairy Cattle

  • Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano FerrazEmail author
  • Giuseppe Rossi
  • Leonardo Conti
  • Gabriel Araújo e Silva Ferraz
  • Lorenzo Leso
  • Matteo Barbari
Conference paper
  • 27 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)

Abstract

Housing system can affect dairy cow’s welfare and performance and the type of bedding material used can also affect comfort and hygiene level of the animals. A wide range of different materials can be used in bedding for dairy cattle, but their physical proprieties must be analyzed to evaluate their potential. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the physical properties of Miscanthus grass in comparison to wheat straw, as an affordable alternative being used as bedding material in housing systems for dairy cows. Particle size, bulk density, air-filled porosity and water holding capacity from Miscanthus and wheat straw were measured experimentally in the lab of the DAGRI of the University of Florence. The particle size was determined by applying 50 g of material on six meshes. Bulk density was determined according to the ASABE Standard S269.4 DEC 91. To determine the water holding capacity and air filled porosity of bedding materials samples the Australian Standards AS 3743-2003 were used. The analysis showed that since Miscanthus presented 88% of the particle size bigger than 50 mm, it also presented higher value of water holding capacity (0.072 kg L−1) in comparison with wheat straw (0.057 kg L−1). Miscanthus presented higher bulk density (26 kg m−3) than wheat straw (18 kg m−3). Both materials presented similar air-filled porosity, around 88%. Based on these physical properties results, it was possible to demonstrate the good potential to use Miscanthus as a viable alternative to wheat straw as a bedding material for dairy cattle.

Keywords

Bulk density Dairy cows Air filled porosity Water holding capacity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the EU program ERA-NET SUSAN and was developed within the project “FreeWalk”. The authors would like to thank Università degli Studi de Firenze (UNIFI) and Federal University of Lavras (UFLA).

References

  1. Agnew, J. M., & Leonard, J. J. (2003). The physical properties of compost. Compost Science & Utilization, 11(3), 238–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Breum, N. O., Nielsen, B.H., Lyngbye, M., Midtgard, U. (1999). Dustiness of chopped straw as affected by lignosulfonate as a dust suppressant. Annales of Agriculture and Environmental Medicine, 6(2), 133–140.Google Scholar
  3. Chaplin, S. J., Tierney, G., Stockwell, C., Logue, D. N., & Kelly, M. (2000). An evaluation of mattresses and mats in two dairy units. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66(4), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Boodt, M., & Verdonck, O. (1972). The physical properties of the substrates in horticulture. Acta Horticulturae, 26, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunlop, M. W., Blackall, P. J., & Stuetz, R. M. (2015). Water addition, evaporation and water holding capacity of poultry litter. Science of the Total Environment, 538, 979–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jain, M. S., Daga, M., & Kalamdhad, A. S. (2018). Physical parameters evaluation during production of soil conditioner from aquatic waste: Hydrilla verticillata (Lf) Royle. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 11, 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jobim, C. C., Nussio, L. G., Reis, R. A., & Schmidt, P. (2007). Avanços metodológicos na avaliação da qualidade da forragem conservada. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 101–119.Google Scholar
  8. Kheravii, S. K., Swick, R. A., Choct, M., & Wu, S. B. (2017). Potential of pelleted wheat straw as an alternative bedding material for broilers. Poultry Science, 96(6), 1641–1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Nakasaki, K., Shoda, M., & Kubota, H. (1986). Effects of a bulking agent on the reaction rate of thermophilic sewage sludge composting. Journal Fermentation Technology, 64(6), 539–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rauscher, B., & Lewandowski, I. (2016). Miscanthus horse bedding compares well to alternatives. In S. Barth, D. Murphy-Bokern, O. Kalinina, G. Taylor, & M. Jones (Eds.), Perennial biomass crops for a resource-constrained world. Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Samadi, S., van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M., Jamshidifard, A. R., Otten, G. P., Droppert, M., Heederik, D. J. J., et al. (2012). The influence of bedding materials on bio-aerosol exposure in dairy barns. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 22, 361–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Standards Australia. (2003). Potting Mixes (AS 3743–2003). Australian/New Zealand Standards (Standards Australia/Standards New Zealand, Sydney).Google Scholar
  13. Van Gastelen, S., Westerlaan, B., Houwers, D. J., & Van Eerdenburg, F. J. C. M. (2011). A study on cow comfort and risk for lameness and mastitis in relation to different types of bedding materials. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(10), 4878–4888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Weyenberg, S., Ulens, T., De Reu, K., Zwertvaegher, I., Demeyer, P., & Pluym, L. (2015). Feasibility of Miscanthus as alternative bedding for dairy cows. Veterinarni Medicina, 60(3).Google Scholar
  15. Ward, P. L., Wohlt, J. E., Zajac, P. K., & Cooper, K. R. (2000). Chemical and physical properties of processed newspaper compared to wheat straw and wood shavings as animal bedding. Journal of Dairy Science, 83(2), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wolfe, T., Vasseur, E., DeVries, T. J., & Bergeron, R. (2018). Effects of alternative deep bedding options on dairy cow preference, lying behavior, cleanliness, and teat end contamination. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(1), 530–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Patrícia Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Giuseppe Rossi
    • 2
  • Leonardo Conti
    • 2
  • Gabriel Araújo e Silva Ferraz
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Leso
    • 2
  • Matteo Barbari
    • 2
  1. 1.Departament of Agricultural Engineering (DEA)Federal University of LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)Università degli Studi di FirenzeFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations