Urban Agriculture, Cui Prodest? Seattle’s Picardo Farm as Seen by Its Gardeners

  • M. E. Menconi
  • P. Borghi
  • D. GrohmannEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering book series (LNCE, volume 67)


The urban green network provides various ecosystem services that are crucial assets in determining cities’ sustainability. Urban agriculture is a type of urban green space that is experiencing a growing interest among Institutions and researchers. This paper analyses its benefits, as perceived by the urban gardeners, using an open-questions survey. The case study is a community garden in Seattle, called Picardo farm. The results show how the citizens involved in community gardens are aware of a variety of values linked with the urban agriculture, that provides outdoor activities, food production, connection with nature, wellbeing, education, and positive social interactions. A significative strength of the community gardens regards the ability to build site-specific cohesive communities, guaranteeing constant stewardship of the place where they are located. Finally, the results show that urban agriculture is a complementary form of urban green space provision with distinctive values of respect to other urban green spaces.


Gardeners’ perception Community gardens Place attachment Wellbeing Sense of belonging Urban green system 



The authors would like to thank the garden leaders of Picardo farm for their invaluable help in organizing and supporting the creation and diffusion of the survey, and for their work with the community.


  1. Bell, S., Fox-Kamper, R., Keshavarz, N., Benson, M., Caputo, S., Noori, S., & Voigt, A. (2016). Urban allotment gardens in Europe. Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Cortinovis, C., Haase, D., Zanon, B., & Geneletti, D. (2019). Is urban spatial development on the right track? Comparing strategies and trends in the European Union. Landscape and Urban Planning, 181, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. FAO. FAO’s role in urban agriculture. Retrieved from: (March, 2019).
  4. Hou, J., & Grohmann, D. (2018). Integrating community gardens into urban parks: Lessons in planning, design and partnership from seattle. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 33, 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lohrberg, F., Licka, L., Scazzosi, L., & Timpe, A. (2015). Urban Agriculture Europe. COST-action. Jovis publisher. Retrieved from: Accessed 11 June 2019.
  6. Menconi, M. E., Artemi, S., Borghi, P., & Grohmann, D. (2018). Role of local action groups in improving the sense of belonging of local communities with their territories. Sustainability, 10, 4681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Menconi, M. E., Grohmann, D., & Mancinelli, C. (2017). European farmers and participatory rural appraisal: A systematic literature review on experiences to optimize rural development. Land use Policy, 60, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Murakami, K. (2005). Do you know why they’re called P-patches?. Retrieved from: Accessed 11 June 2019.
  9. Neals, S., & Walters, S. (2008). Rural Be/longing and rural social organizations: conviviality and community-making in the english countryside. Sociology, 42, 279–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. United Nations. (2016). New Urban Agenda Habitat III. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable urban Development, Oct. 17–20, Quito, Ecuador.Google Scholar
  11. Wang, L., Zheng, H., Wen, Z., Liu, L., Robinson, B. E., Li, R., et al. (2019). Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Weidner, T., Yang, A., & Hamm, M. W. (2019). Consolidating the current knowledge on urban agriculture in productive urban food systems: Learnings, gaps and outlook. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 1637–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental SciencesUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations