Advertisement

Establishment of Problem E-learning Behavior Scale

  • Junyi Zheng
  • Wenhui PengEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1126)

Abstract

Problem e-learning behavior exists commonly among learners, which affects the performance of online learning seriously. Therefore, it is meaningful to monitor and evaluate whether online learners have learning behavior problems. This paper designs a scale of e-learning behavior to evaluate the behavioral problems of online learners. Firstly, the connotation of problem e-learning behavior is discussed. Secondly, the various manifestations of problem e-learning behavior are summarized and classified into five dimensions: learning escape, behavior deficiency, behavior misconduct, improper learning time arrangement and negative emotional disclosure. Finally, the scale of e-learning behavior is developed by way of standard method of the development of psychological scale. The scale is proved to be reasonable by large scale measurement, confirmatory factor analysis and reliability and validity analysis.

Keywords

Online learning Problem e-learning behavior Scale Establishment of scale 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by NSFC of China [NO.61977036].

References

  1. 1.
    Peng, W.: Analysis and Modeling of E-learning Behavior. Science Press, Beijing (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zhang, X., Liu, M., Li, Q.: E-learning problem behavior study. Softw. Guide (Educ. Technol.) 14(10), 37–38 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tian, J., Nie, Y.: College students’ e-learning problem behavior study. Dig. Educ. 2(02), 29–32 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, C.: An investigation and structure model study on college students’ studying-interest. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 3(3), 33–39 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mao, G., Liu, Q., Li, H., Fan, F.: Research and application of problem learning behavior analysis model in e-learning environment. E-education Res. 37(11), 32–37+84 (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lashayo, D.M., Johar, Md.G.Md.: Preliminary study on multi-factors affecting adoption of e-learning systems in universities: a case of open university of Tanzania (OUT). Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 10(3), 29–37 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jayaprakash, S.M., Moody, E.W., Lauría, E.J.M., et al.: Early alert of academically at-risk students: an open source analytics initiative. J. Learn. Anal. 1(1), 6–47 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jia, P., Maloney, T.: Using predictive modelling to identify students at risk of poor university outcomes. High. Educ. 70(1), 127–149 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhanuprakash, C., Nijagunarya, Y.S., Jayaram, M.A.: An informal approach to identify bright graduate students by evaluating their classroom behavioral patterns by using kohonen self organizing feature map. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 10(8), 22–32 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhou, S., Xin, D., Yang, X., Fu, J.: Chinese version of the premonition sadness scale and its reliability and validity test. Health Vocat. Educ. 35(21), 129–132 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical and Electronic EngineeringWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina
  2. 2.School of Educational Information TechnologyCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations