Advertisement

Quality Evaluation of Mechanical Experiment Teaching Under the Background of Emerging Engineering Education

  • Mengya Zhang
  • Zhiping LiuEmail author
  • Kun Chen
  • Qingying Zhang
  • Jinshan Dai
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1126)

Abstract

Under the background of Emerging Engineering Education, in order to further deepen the education reform, mechanical talents cultivation target and the cultivation system are formulated, the evaluation system of the mechanical experiment teaching quality is constructed. The application of heuristic teaching and the cultivation of students’ innovative research ability are more emphasized. The quality of experimental teaching is evaluated and graded by using the method of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Finally, an example is analyzed. The results show that the evaluation model is more objective, scientific and comprehensive, and is suitable for the objective evaluation of mechanical experiment teaching quality.

Keywords

Emerging Engineering Education Mechanical experiment teaching Quality evaluation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by—(1) Wuhan University of Technology Teaching Research Project “The reform of mechanical experiment teaching method based on BOPPPS model under the background of Emerging Engineering Education” (NO. w2018102); (2) 2019 China Logistics Association Logistics Teaching Reform Project “The construction of port practice platform based on the combination of 3D scene and VR” (NO. JZW2019128).

References

  1. 1.
    Wen, H.Y.: Exploration of experimental teaching in applied undergraduate universities under the background of emerging engineering education. Educ. Res. 10, 163 (2017). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaviyarasi, R., Balasubramanian, T.: Exploring the high potential factors that affects students’ academic performance. Int. J. Educ. Manag. Eng. (IJEME) 8(6), 15–23 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castillo, R.C.: A paradigm shift to outcomes-based higher education: policies, principles and preparations. Int. J. Sci. Basic Appl. Res. 14(1), 174–186 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feng, D.Y., Mo, Y.M.: Discussion on the training mode of mechanical design and manufacturing and automation professionals under the concept of emerging engineering education. Shandong Ind. Technol. 2017(22), 236–238 (2017). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang, M.Y., Zhang, Q.Y., Wang, Z.Y., et al.: Mechanical experimental platform construction based on BOPPPS model. In: International Conference on Computer Science, Engineering and Education Applications, pp. 194–204. Springer, Cham (2019)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rajak, A., Shrivastava, A.K., Bhardwaj, S., et al.: Assessment and attainment of program educational objectives for post graduate courses. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 11(2), 26–32 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    He, W., Fan, X.H., He, Y.M., et al.: Research on the training mode of electrical information professionals under the background of emerging engineering education. Educ. Mod. 5(13), 10–12 (2018). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hong, G., Xu, D.Q.: On the training of high-qualified and application-oriented talents of engineering. Res. High. Educ. Eng. 6, 44–48 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sun, L., Liu, Y., Chang, L.: Building of applied innovative talents training system in local colleges. Res. Explor. Lab. 1, 4555–4559 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zheng, S., Guan, W., Li, B., et al.: Analysis of Internet of Things talent training and curriculum system innovation. In: International Conference on Education, Management and Computing Technology (ICEMCT-2016). Atlantis Press (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Khan, A.A., Madden, J.: Speed learning: maximizing student learning and engagement in a limited amount of time. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 8(7), 22–30 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robles, A.C.M.O.: Blended learning for lifelong learning: an innovation for college education students. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 4(6), 1–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ying, L., Yanfei, X., Ran, H.: Application of QFD in the process of cultivating high-quality practical and innovative talents of mechanical specialty. Res. High. Educ. Eng. 2, 124–128 (2011). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Xu, G.N.: Exploration and practice of constructing the large platform of experiment teaching for local universities. Res. Explor. Lab. 29(5), 1–3+11 (2010). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, W., Meng, X., An, Y.: Exploration of the experimental teaching reform under the cultivation model of innovative talents. Exp. Sci. Technol. 2, 53 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fetaji, B., Fetaji, M., Ebibi, M., et al.: Analyses of impacting factors of ICT in education management: case study. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 10(2), 26–34 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang, G., Li, X., Li, G., et al.: Reform of the examination and evaluation system for the mechanical specialty in universities. World Transp. Eng. Technol. Educ. 13(4), 620–626 (2015)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tam, M.: Outcomes-based approach to quality assessment and curriculum improvement in higher education. Qual. Assur. Educ. 22(2), 158–168 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boring, A., Ottoboni, K., Stark, P.: Student evaluations of teaching (mostly) do not measure teaching effectiveness. Sci. Open Res. 1, 1–11 (2016)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haji, E., Azmani, A., Harzli, M.E.: Using AHP method for educational and vocational guidance. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJITCS) 9(1), 9–17 (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tshai, K.Y., Ho, J.H., Yap, E.H., et al.: Outcome-based education–the assessment of programme educational objectives for an engineering undergraduate degree. Eng. Educ. 9(1), 74–85 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kotevski, Z., Tasevska, I.: Evaluating the potentials of educational systems to advance implementing multimedia technologies. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 9(1), 26–35 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, X.Y.: Demonstration effect evaluation of experimental teaching demonstration center based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. Lab. Res. Explor. 04, 132–135 (2015). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu, S., Chen, P.: Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation in practice teaching assessment of computer majors. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 7(11), 12–19 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mu, Y.: Evaluation and analysis of experimental teaching quality in universities based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation. BBS 12(5), 115–116 (2013). (in Chinese)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mengya Zhang
    • 1
  • Zhiping Liu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kun Chen
    • 1
  • Qingying Zhang
    • 1
  • Jinshan Dai
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Logistics EngineeringWuhan University of TechnologyWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations