Advertisement

Analysis of the Structure and Workspace of the Isoglide-Type Robot for Rehabilitation Tasks

  • Gagik Rashoyan
  • Konstantin Shalyukhin
  • Anton AntonovEmail author
  • Aleksandr Aleshin
  • Sergey Skvortsov
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1126)

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of the various structural schemes of Isoglide-type mechanisms. Several variants of the kinematic chains with the different number and position of the links and joints are presented. Next, the paper presents a methodology for constructing a maximum workspace for such mechanisms, which is based on the use of the chord method. The working area for one selected type of mechanisms is modeled by means of the suggested approach for different values of the links’ lengths.

Keywords

Parallel manipulator Isoglide Robotic rehabilitation system Workspace Chord method 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 19-19-00692.

References

  1. 1.
    Plitan, F., Badri, A., Meigolinedjad, J., Keshavarz, M.: Adaptive artificial intelligence based model base controller: applied to surgical endoscopy telemanipulator. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 5(9), 113–115 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kong, X., Gosselin, C.M.: Kinematics and singularity analysis of a novel type of 3-CRR 3-DOF translational parallel manipulator. Int. J. Robot. Res. 21(9), 791–798 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kong, X., Gosselin, C.M.: Generation of parallel manipulators with three translational degrees of freedom based on screw theory. In: Proceedings of 2001 CCToMM Symposium on Mechanisms, Machines and Mechatronics, Montreal, Canada, p. M3–01–012 (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glazunov, V., Kheylo, S.: Dynamics and control of planar, translational, and spherical parallel manipulators. In: Zhang, D., Wei, B. (eds.) Dynamic Balancing of Mechanisms and Synthesizing of Parallel Robots, pp. 365–402. Springer, Cham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rashoyan, G.V., Shalyukhin, K.A., Gaponenko, E.V.: Development of structural schemes of parallel structure manipulators using screw calculus. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering vol. 327, p. 042090 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glazunov, V.A., Kasilov, V.P., Kozyrev, A.V., Levin, S.V., Shalyukhin, K.A.: The parallel structure manipulator with three orthogonal translational degrees of freedom and its rigidity analysis. Eng. Autom. Probl. 3, 48–56 (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glazunov, V.: Design of decoupled parallel manipulators by means of the theory of screws. Mech. Mach. Theory 45(2), 239–250 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shalyukhin, K.A., Rashoyan, G.V., Aleshin, A.K., Skvortsov, S.A., Levin, S.V., Antonov, A.V.: Problems of kinematic analysis and special positions of mechanisms of robots with parallel structure. J. Mach. Manuf. Reliab. 47(4), 310–316 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snyman, J.A., du Plessis, L.J., Duffy, J.: An optimization approach to the determination of the boundaries of manipulator workspaces. J. Mech. Des. 122(4), 447–456 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hay, A.M., Snyman, J.A.: The chord method for the determination of nonconvex workspaces of planar parallel manipulator. Comput. Math Appl. 43(8–9), 1135–1151 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hay, A.M., Snyman, J.A.: A multi-level optimization methodology for determining the dextrous workspaces of planar parallel manipulators. Struct. Multidisciplinary Optim. 30(6), 422–427 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joumah, A.A., Albitar, C.: Design optimization of 6-RUS parallel manipulator using hybrid algorithm. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJITCS) 10(2), 83–95 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nanda, S.K., Panda, S., Subudhi, P.R.S., Das, R.K.: A novel application of artificial neural network for the solution on inverse kinematics controls of robotic manipulators. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. (IJISA) 4(9), 81–91 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chablat, D., Wenger, Ph., Merlet, J.: Workspace analysis of the Orthoglide using interval analysis. In: Lenarčič, J., Thomas, F. (eds.) Advances in Robot Kinematics, pp. 397–406. Springer, Dordrecht (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar, V., Sen, S., Roy, S.S., Das, S.K., Shome, S.N.: Inverse kinematics of redundant manipulator using interval Newton method. Int. J. Eng. Manuf. (IJEM) 5(2), 19–29 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gagik Rashoyan
    • 1
  • Konstantin Shalyukhin
    • 1
  • Anton Antonov
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aleksandr Aleshin
    • 1
  • Sergey Skvortsov
    • 1
  1. 1.Blagonravov Mechanical Engineering Research Institute of the Russian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations