Advertisement

Conclusions: What Is Neoliberalism?

  • Ola InnsetEmail author
Chapter
  • 39 Downloads
Part of the Springer Studies in the History of Economic Thought book series (SSHET)

Abstract

Innset concludes his study of the first meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society in 1947 with elaborations on what it means to see neoliberalism as a theory of modernity, not just a set of policy proposals. Only in appreciating the context of the development of early neoliberalism can we see its profound novelty, and how it is a much broader philosophy than what is often assumed. The notion of markets as mediators of modernity is very much alive and well, informing most political projects and even common sense to some degree.

Keywords

Neoliberalism Contextualization Modernity Markets 

Secondary Literature

  1. Aron, R. (1939). Remarques sur L’Objectivité des sciences sociales. Theoria, 5, 161–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Audier, S. (2012). Néo-Libéralisme(s). Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  3. Azar, R. (2015). Neoliberalism, austerity, and authoritarianism. New Politics, 15.Google Scholar
  4. Ban, C. (2016). Ruling ideas–How global neoliberalism goes local. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell, D. (2014). What Is liberalism? Political Theory, 42, 682–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blyth, M. (2013). Austerity–The history of a dangerous idea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, W. (2005). Edgework. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Burgin, A. (2012). The great persuasion: Reinventing free markets since the depression. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coase, R. (1959). The federal communications commission. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cockett, R. (1995). Thinking the unthinkable: Think-tanks and the economic counter-revolution. Waukegan, Illinois: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cristoph, G. (2013). More neoliberalism to end neoliberalism? The historical trajectory of neoliberal thought and post-2008 political economy. London: Kingston University.Google Scholar
  12. Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Dardot, P., & Laval, Christian. (2013). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, W. (2016). The difficulty of neoliberalism. Open Democracy, June 1.Google Scholar
  15. Dekker, E. (2016). The viennese students of civilization–The meaning and context of Austrian economics reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Denord, F. (2007). Néo-libéralisme-Version française. Paris: Demopolis.Google Scholar
  17. Djelic, M. L. (2014). Spreading ideas to change the world–inventing and institutionalizing the neoliberal think tank. In Political Affair: Bridging Markets and Politics. Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  18. Doksheim, M., & Kjøllesdal, K. (2009). Svikt! - en introduksjon til public choice. Oslo: Civita.Google Scholar
  19. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2004). Capital resurgent: Roots of the neoliberal revolution. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Epstein, R. A. (2017). Trump vs. free trade. Defining Ideas-A Hoover Institution Journal, March 6.Google Scholar
  21. Foucault, M. (2000). Power. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  22. Frost, G. (2008). Antony fisher-Champion of liberty. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  23. Gamble, A. (1996). Hayek: The iron cage of liberty. Key contemporary thinkers. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  24. Harcourt, B. E. (2011). The illusion of free markets: Punishment and the myth of natural order. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hayek, F. (1949). Intellectuals and socialism. The University of Chicago Law Review.Google Scholar
  27. Hayek, F. (1972). The constitution of liberty. Chicago: Gateway.Google Scholar
  28. Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction: Perversity, futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Innset, O. (2020). Nyliberalismens historie i Norge. Oslo: Fagbokforlaget.Google Scholar
  30. MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in Chains. New York: Scribe Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Meagher, R. (2009). Right ideas: Discourse, framing and the conservative coalition. New York: University of New York.Google Scholar
  32. Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: How neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  33. Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from mont pèlerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Moyn, S. (2014). Imaginary intellectual history. In Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History (pp. 112–130). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Müller, J. W. (2008). Fear and freedom: On cold war liberalism. European Journal of Political Theory, 45–64.Google Scholar
  36. Nik-Kah, E., & Van Horn, R. (2016). The ascendancy of Chicago neoliberalism. In The Handbook of Neoliberalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Nordbakken, L. P. (2017). Liberale tenkere for vår tid. Oslo: Civita.Google Scholar
  38. Ostry, J., Prakash, L., & Furceri, D. (2016). Neoliberalism: Oversold? Finance & Development 53.Google Scholar
  39. Polanyi-Levitt, K., & Seccareccia, M. (2016). Thoughts on Mirowski and Neoliberalism from a Polanyian Perspective. Institute for New Economic Thinking.Google Scholar
  40. Quiggin, J. (2010). Zombie economics-How dead ideas still walk among us. New Jersey, United States: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Reinert, E. (2007). How rich countries got rich and why poor countries stay poor. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
  42. Robin, C. (2011). The reactionary mind: Conservatism from edmund burke to sarah palin. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ruggie, J. (1982). International regimes, transactions, and change: Embedded liberalism in the postwar economic order. International Organization, 36, 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Saad-Filho, A., & Fine, B. (2016). Thirteen things you need to know about neolibrealism. Critical Sociology, 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
  45. Sally, R. (1998). Classical liberalism and international economic order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Shaikh, A. (2016). Capitalism–Competition, conflict, crises. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Springer, S. (2012). Neoliberalism as discourse: Between foucauldian political economy and marxian poststructuralism. Critical Discourse Studies, 9, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Streeck, W. (2011). The Crises of democratic capitalism. New Left Review, II, 5–29.Google Scholar
  49. Van Horn, R. (2009). Reinventing monopoly and the role of corporations: The roots of chicago law and economics. In The Road from Mont Pelerin (pp. 204–238). Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Van Horn, R., & Klaes, M. (2011). Intevening in Laissez-faire Liberalism: Chicago’s shift on patents. In Building Chicago Economics (pp. 180–208). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Wilson, D. S. (2015). The road to ideology. How friedrich hayek became a monster. Evonomics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Library of NorwayOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations