Advertisement

Reordering Search Results to Support Learning

  • Cleber Pinelli TeixeiraEmail author
  • Marcelo Tibau
  • Sean Wolfgand Matsui Siqueira
  • Bernardo Pereira Nunes
Conference paper
  • 135 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11984)

Abstract

Although many learning activities involve search engines, their ranking criteria are focused on providing factual rather than procedural information. In the context of Searching as Learning, providing factual information may not be the best approach. In this paper, we discuss the relevance criteria according to traditional learning theories to support search engine results reordering based on content suitability to learning purposes. We proceeded on the investigation by selecting some self-proclaimed search literacy experts to answer thoroughly questions about their views on the reordered results. We take into account that literacy expert’s judgment may reveal issues regarded to technical side on learning supported by search tools. Experienced users claimed a preference for reliable sources and direct answers to what they are looking for, as they have exploratory skills to overcome information incompleteness.

Keywords

Informal learning Searching as Learning Search Engine Result Pages 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was financed in part by the ‘National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) - Brazil’ - Process 315374/2018-7, Project ‘Searching as Learning: the information search as a tool for learning’ and by the ‘Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel’ (CAPES) – Brazil – Finance Code 001.

References

  1. 1.
    Ertmer, P.A., Newby, T.J.: Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective. Perform. Improv. Q. 6(4), 50–72 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ausubel, D., Novak, J., Hanesian, H.: Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, 2nd edn. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kopliku, A., Pinel-Sauvagnat, K., Boughanem, M.: Aggregated search: a new information retrieval paradigm. ACM Comput. Surv. 46(3) (2014). 31 pages, Article 41.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2523817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belkin, N.J., Oddy, R.N., Brooks, H.M.: Ask for information retrieval: part I. Background and theory. J. Doc. 38(2), 61–71 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruner, J.S.: The narrative construction of reality. Crit. Inq. 18(1), 1–21 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Collins-Thompson, K., Hansen, P., Hauff, C.: Search as learning. Report from Dagstuhl Seminar 17092 (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smith, C.L., Rieh, S.Y.: Knowledge-context in search systems: toward information-literate actions. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGIR Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (CHIIR 2019), pp. 55–62 (2019)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lefrançois, G.R.: Theories of Human Learning: What the Professor Said, 6th edn. Cengage Learning, Wadsworth (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Huurdeman, H.C., Wilson, M.L., Kamps, J.: Active and passive utility of search interface features in different information seeking task stages. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR 2016), pp. 3–12. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Manrique, R.: Automatic learning content sequence via linked open data. In: International Semantic Web Conference (DC@ ISWC 2017) (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marchionini, G.: Exploratory search: from finding to understanding. Commun. ACM 49(4), 41–46 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ochoa, X., Duval, E.: Relevance ranking metrics for learning objects. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 1(1), 34–48 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Piaget, J.A.: Equilibração das estruturas cognitivas: problema central do desenvolvimento. Trad. Álvaro Cabral. Rio de Janeiro, Zahar (1976)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rieh, S.Y., Collins-Thompson, K., Hansen, P., Lee, H.J.: Towards searching as a learning process: a review of current perspectives and future directions. J. Inf. Sci. 42(1), 19–34 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tibau, M., Siqueira, S.W.M., Nunes, B.P., Bortoluzzi, M., Marenzi, I.: Modeling exploratory search as a knowledge-intensive process. In: 2018 IEEE 18th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), Mumbai, pp. 34–38 (2018)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Vakkari, P.: Searching as learning: a systematization based on literature. J. Inf. Sci. 42(1), 7–18 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978). (Edited by Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S., Souberman, E.)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yilmaz, T., Ozcan, R., Altingovde, I.S., Ulusoy, Ö.: Improving educational web search for question-like queries through subject classification. Inf. Process. Manage. 56(1), 228–246 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Voskarides, N., et al.: Weakly-supervised contextualization of knowledge graph facts. In: The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR 2018), pp. 765–774. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu, C., Gwizdka, J., Liu, J., Xu, T., Belkin, N.J.: Analysis and evaluation of query reformulations in different task types. In: Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 1–9. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marchionini, G, Geislerand, G., Brunk, B.: Agileviews: a human-centered framework for interfaces to information spaces. In: Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, vol. 37 (2000)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Singh, J., Zerr, S., Siersdorfer, S.: Structure-aware visualization of text corpora. In: Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR 2017), pp. 107–116. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3020165.3020182
  24. 24.
    Bandura, A.: Self-Efficacy. The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York. Emory University, Division of Educational Studies, Information on Self-Efficacy: A Community of ScholarsGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maier, S.F., Seligman, M.E.: Learned helplessness: theory and evidence. J. Exper. Psychol. Gen. 105(1), 3–46 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Federal University of the State of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations