Students’ Language Needs Analysis as a Motivation Mover - Czech and Taiwanese Case Study

  • Miloslava CernaEmail author
  • Chi-Jen Lin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11984)


The paper discusses a proved pedagogical scenario on active involvement of students into the learning process by formulating their needs and expectations and sharing experience on individual subjects at the introductory lesson at the beginning of semester. This study investigates students’ language learning behaviour, their approach and motivation in Czech and Taiwanese university environment. The paper focuses on students’ experience in utilization of online study material and correlation between their needs in practising individual language competences and their level of language competence.

A mixed qualitative-quantitative research was conducted. Data collection consisted of the survey based on the key tool, which was a questionnaire on Students’ language needs and a follow up-discussion on students’ experience, expectations and perceived potential benefits of on-line sources as well as traditional teaching/learning approaches.

The output of the study brought the following conclusions. The case study has shown that students’ learning background, experience and behaviour was different in several analysed areas in two compared environments but highly inspiring and leading to the fruitful discussion enlarged with an intercultural dimension. The tutors’ interest in students’ needs proved to be a motivating factor enabling students to think of their language needs, formulate them and discuss them so that they could adapt and widen their language learning habits.


Needs analysis Case-study Language Web 2.0 Motivation Education Survey 



The paper is supported by the project SPEV 2019 at the Faculty of Informatics and Management of the University of Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic. In addition, the authors thank Anna Borkovcova for her help with the project.


  1. 1.
    Cerna, M.: Psychodidactic approach in the development of language competences in university students within blended learning. Open Learn. J. Open Distance e-Learn. 33(2), 142–154 (2018). Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohanty, A.: Cognition, Affection and Conation: Implications for Pedagogical Issues in Higher Education (2010).
  3. 3.
    Greener, S.: How are web 2.0 technologies affecting the academic roles in higher education? A view from the literature. In: 11th European Conference on e-Learning, ECEL 2012, Groningen, pp. 124–132 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klimova, B., Poulova, P.: Pedagogical principles of the implementation of social networks at schools. In: Gong, Z., Chiu, D.K.W., Zou, D. (eds.) ICWL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9584, pp. 23–30. Springer, Cham (2016). Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cerna, M., Borkovcova, A.: Enhancing students’ involvement in the process of education through social applications. In: Uskov, V.L., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C., Vlacic, L. (eds.) KES SEEL-18 2018. SIST, vol. 99, pp. 185–193. Springer, Cham (2019). Scholar
  6. 6.
    Popescu, E., Kubincová, Z., Homola, M.: Blogging activities in higher education: comparing learning scenarios in multiple course experiences. In: Li, F.W.B., Klamma, R., Laanpere, M., Zhang, J., Manjón, B.F., Lau, R.W.H. (eds.) ICWL 2015. LNCS, vol. 9412, pp. 197–207. Springer, Cham (2015). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Valtonen, T., et al.: Net generation at social software: challenging assumptions, clarifying relationships and raising implications for learning. Int. J. Educ. Res. 49, 210–219 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cerna, M., Poulova, P.: Social software applications and their role in the process of education from the perspective of university students. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on e-Learning, pp. 87–96. Academic Publishing, Groningen, Reading (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, Ch. J.: An online peer assessment approach to supporting mind-mapping flipped learning activities for college English writing courses. J. Comput. Educ. Springer, Heidelberg (2019).
  10. 10.
    Smart, K.L., Cappel, J.J.: Students’ perceptions of online learning: a comparative study. J. Inf. Technol. Educ. 5, 201–219 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tess, P.A.: The role of social media in higher education classes (real and virtual) – a literature review. Comput. Hum. Behav. 29, A60–A68 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schroeder, A., Minocha, S., Schneider, C.: The strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 26, 159–174 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheung, S.K.S.: Distance-learning students’ perception on the usefulness of open educational resources. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L., Ma, W.W.K., Lee, L.-K., Yang, H. (eds.) ICBL 2017. LNCS, vol. 10309, pp. 389–399. Springer, Cham (2017). Scholar
  14. 14.
    Poulova, P., Cerna, M.: Utilization of the internet and eLearning experience in students entering university-a longitudinal study. Adv. Sci. Lett. 24(4), 2573–2577 (2018). Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kostolanyova, K., Simonova, I.: Learning English through the adaptive model of e-learning reflecting learner’s sensory characteristics. In: Cheung, S.K.S., Kwok, L., Kubota, K., Lee, L.-K., Tokito, J. (eds.) ICBL 2018. LNCS, vol. 10949, pp. 57–68. Springer, Cham (2018). Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brannen, J.: Mixing Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Research. Routledge, London (1992). Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Informatics and ManagementUniversity of Hradec KraloveHradec KraloveCzech Republic
  2. 2.College of Liberal Arts and Social SciencesNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations