Riga International Coach Terminal: Safety and Security Risk-Based Decision-Making Approach

  • Vaira GromuleEmail author
  • Irina Yatskiv (Jackiva)
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Intelligent Transportation and Infrastructure book series (LNITI)


Due to the constant growth of traffic between EU countries it is necessary to improve the interconnectivity between states, remove bottlenecks, and also to strengthen the robustness of transport infrastructure and the resilience of the overall network. The nodes such as the bus and rail station connecting regional and urban transport reflect the demand for novel intelligent solutions and farsighted infrastructure planning.

The goal of the paper presents a study of the Riga International Coach Terminal (RICT) as an object of critical infrastructure. It should be in frame of resilient system and safety and security risk-based decision-making approach based on research. The company provides services to bus and coach undertakings and passengers and meets the requirements of a medium-sized enterprise.

Authors analysed European and National level regulatory documents and trends in the field of passenger transport and transport infrastructure security. After RICT safety and security management system presented authors provides recommendations for structuring the security and risk management process, including interfaces with internal and external bodies.


Passenger terminal Resilient system Safety and security management system Stakeholders Data for risk assessment Incidents 


  1. 1.
    European Commission: Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    EU White Paper - Roadmap to a single European transport area - Towards a competitive and resource-efficient transport system (COM (2011) 144 final of 28 March 2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Commission, GEAR 2030, Final report-2017, DG GROW – Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, October 2017Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gromule, V., Yatskiv, I., Pēpulis, J.: Safety and security of passenger terminal: the case study of Riga International Coach Terminal. Procedia Eng. 178, 147–154 (2017). I. Kabashkin, I. Yatskiv (Jackiva) and O. Prentkovskis eds.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ganin, A.A., Massaro, E., Gutland, A., Steen, N., Keister, J., Kott, A., Mangoubi, R., Linkov, I.: Operational resilience: concepts, design, and analysis. Sci. Rep. 6, 19540 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fiksel, J., Goodman, I., Hecht, A.: Resilience: navigating toward a sustainable future. Solutions 5(5), 38–47 (2014)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Monzon, A., Di Ciommo, F.: City-Hubs, Sustainable and Efficient Urban Transport Interchanges. CRC, Taylor and Francis Group, Boca Raton (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    SECUR-ED, White Paper for Public Transport Stakeholders (2014)
  9. 9.
    SecureStation - Passenger station and terminal design for safety, security and resilience to terrorist attack (2013).
  10. 10.
    Yatskiv (Jackiva), I., Savrasovs, M., Gromule, V., Zemljanikins, V.: Passenger terminal safety: simulation modelling as decision support tool. Procedia Eng. 134, 459–468 (2016)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yatskiv, I., Gromule, V.: Holistic approach to passenger terminal risk estimation. In: Frenkel, I., Lisnianski, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on Stochastic Models in Reliability Engineering, Life Science and Operations Management (SMRLO 2016), Beer Sheva, Israel, 15–18 February 2016, pp. 643–649 (2016).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.JSC Riga International Coach TerminalRigaLatvia
  2. 2.Transport and Telecommunication InstituteRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations