Advertisement

A Parameterized Turnout Model for Simulation of Dynamic Vehicle-Turnout Interaction with an Application to Crossing Geometry Assessment

  • Björn A. PålssonEmail author
Conference paper
  • 7 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

This paper presents a parameterized structural track model for the simulation of dynamic vehicle-turnout interaction in a multi body simulation environment. The model is demonstrated by performing simulations for different vehicle speeds, crossing geometries and fixations between crossing rail and sleepers with different stiffness. Results are presented for dynamic wheel-rail contact forces, bending moments in crossing rail and sleepers and sleeper-ballast contact pressure. The main conclusions are that (a) the peak dynamic bending moment in the sleeper under the crossing transition is significantly higher with a stiff direct fixing compared to a softer indirect fixing and (b) the structural loading in terms of bending moment in the crossing rail, bending moment in the underlaying sleeper and sleeper-ballast contact pressure increases proportionally and significantly with increased impact angle and vehicle speed for wheels passing over the crossing transition.

Keywords

Track model Turnout Parameterization Multi body dynamics Structural loading 

References

  1. 1.
    Shift2Rail homepage. https://shift2rail.org/. Accessed 24 June 2019
  2. 2.
    Simpack 2019x. http://www.simpack.com. Accessed 24 June 2019
  3. 3.
    Craig, R.R., Bampton, M.C.C.: Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA J. Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronautics 6(7), 1313–1319 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    In2Track Deliverable D2.2, Enhanced S&C whole system analysis, design and virtual validation, 338 pp and 2 annexes (61 + 11 pp) (2019)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jenkins, H.H., Stephenson, J.E., Clayton, G.A., Morland, G.W., Lyon, D.: The effect of track and vehicle parameters on wheel/rail vertical dynamic forces. Railway Eng. J. 3(1), 2–6 (1974)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pålsson, B.A.: A linear wheel-crossing interaction model. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part F: J. Rail Rapid Transit 232(10), 2431–2443 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pålsson, B.A.: Optimisation of railway crossing geometry considering a representative set of wheel profiles. Veh. Syst. Dyn. 53(2), 274–301 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Torstensson, P.T., Squicciarini, G., Krüger, M., Pålsson, B.A., Nielsen, J.C.O., Thompson, D.J.: Wheel–rail impact loads and noise generated at railway crossings – influence of vehicle speed and crossing dip angle. J. Sound Vibr. 456, 119–136 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chalmers University of Technology/CHARMECGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations