Advertisement

Effect of Tyre Pressure on Ride Comfort from an Integrated Chassis Control Perspective

  • Cor-Jacques KatEmail author
  • Pieter Schalk Els
Conference paper
  • 1 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering book series (LNME)

Abstract

Ride comfort is one of the aspects that may be improved through integrated chassis control. The effect of tyre pressure on the ride comfort of a SUV with low profile tyres is investigated to quantify its contribution as a system within integrated chassis control. A SUV was subjected to two road profiles on a 4-poster test rig. Ride comfort was objectively evaluated for ten repeat runs at three inflation pressures over two roads. The largest relative percentage improvement in ride comfort of 1.5% was seen between the lowest and highest pressures over the rougher road. This improvement is below the relative difference threshold for ride comfort. Furthermore, no significant difference between the median combined point ride values across the three tyre pressures on the two roads were found. Therefore, a perceptible change in ride comfort may not result from inflation pressure alone. However, in combination with other system changes within integrated chassis control, perceptible change may be achieved.

Keywords

Ride comfort Tyre pressure Integrated chassis control 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Horizon 2020 Framework Program, Marie Skłodowska-Curie actions, under Grant Agreement no. 645736.

References

  1. 1.
    British Standards Institution, BS 6841 - British Standard Guide to measurement and evaluation of human exposure to whole-body mechanical vibration and repeated shock, London (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Organization for Standarization, ISO 2631-1: Mechanical vibration and shock - evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration, Geneva (1997)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mansfield, N.J., Griffin, M.J.: Difference thresholds for automobile seat vibration. Appl. Ergon. 31(3), 255–261 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morioka, M., Griffin, M.J.: Difference thresholds for intensity perception of whole-body vertical vibration: Effect of frequency and magnitude. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107(1), 620–624 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Matsumoto, Y., Maeda, S., Oji, Y.: Influence of frequency on difference thresholds for magnitude of vertical sinusoidal whole-body vibration. Ind. Health 40(4), 313–319 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Forta, N.G., Morioka, M., Griffin, M.J.: Difference thresholds for the perception of whole-body vertical vibration: dependence on the frequency and magnitude of vibration. Ergonomics 52(10), 1305–1310 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130903023709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gräbe, R.P., Kat, C., van Staden, P.J., Els, P.S.: Ride comfort difference thresholds for a vehicle on a 4-poster test rig. Manuscript submitted for publication (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    International Organization for Standarization, ISO 8608: Mechanical vibration – Road surface profiles – Reporting of measured data, Geneva (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Griffin, M.J.: Handbook of Human Vibration. Academic Press Limited, London (1990)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vehicle Dynamics Group, Department of Mechanical and Aeronautical EngineeringUniversity of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations