Advertisement

Conclusion: How Can We Build a Theory of Imagining

  • Luca Tateo
Chapter
  • 14 Downloads
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Psychology book series (BRIEFSPSYCHOL)

Abstract

This chapter presents the new theory of complementarity between imaginative and non-imaginative modes of knowing. It discusses the model, and how it can be understood in terms of sociogenesis of higher mental functions, and, finally, it presents the problem of educating the imaginative activity.

Keywords

Imaginative processes Non-imaginative processes Sociogenesis Education 

References

  1. Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Imitation: A chapter in the natural history of consciousness. Mind, 3(9), 26–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bertuol-Garcia, D., Morsello, C., N El-Hani, C., & Pardini, R. (2018). A conceptual framework for understanding the perspectives on the causes of the science–practice gap in ecology and conservation. Biol. Rev., 93(2), 1032–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird, F., Twiss, S. B., Pedersen, K. P., Miller, C. A., & Grelle, B. (Eds.). (2016). Practices of Global Ethics: Historical Backgrounds, Current Issues, and Future Prospects. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1911). Formulations on the two principles of mental functioning. Yearbook, 3 (1). In Standard Edition of Freud’s Psychological Writings (Vol. 12, pp. 215–226).Google Scholar
  5. Heisig, J. W. (1976). Jung and the “imago Dei”: The future of an idea. J. Relig., 56(1), 88–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and collective unconscious. In The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Trans. R. F. C. Hull, Bollingen Series XX. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kohler, A. (2018). From the logic of the child to a natural logic: Perspectives as knowledge. Human Arenas, 1(1), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lapoujade, M. N. (1988). Filosofía de la imaginación. In Cerro del agua. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
  9. Papastathopoulos, S., & Kugiumutzakis, G. (2007). The intersubjectivity of imagination: The special case of imaginary companions. In S. Bråten (Ed.), On Being Moved. From Mirror Neurons to Empathy (pp. 219–233). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Piaget, J. (1959). The Language and Thought of the Child. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Tateo, L. (2014). Science at the supermarket: Multiplication, personalization and consumption of science in everyday life. Integr. Psychol. Behav. Sci., 48(2), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tateo, L. (2015). Giambattista Vico and the psychological imagination. Cult. Psychol., 21(2), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tateo, L. (2017). Poetic destroyers. Vico, Emerson and the aesthetic dimension of experiencing. Cult. Psychol., 23(3), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tateo, L. (2019). The cultures of grief: The practice of post-mortem photography and iconic internalized voices. Hum. Aff., 28(4), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Toren, C. (2012). Imagining the world that warrants our imagination: The revelation of ontogeny. Camb. J. Anthropol., 30(1), 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. von Uexküll, J. (2013). A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  17. Vaihinger, H. (2014). The Philosophy of as if. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. J. Russ. East. Eur. Psychol., 42(1), 7–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zittoun, T., & Gillespie, A. (2015). Imagination in Human and Cultural Development. Hove, East Sussex: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Federal University of BahiaSalvadorBrazil

Personalised recommendations