Advertisement

Thinking About Risk: Responding to Threat and Disintegration in a Fraught World

  • Elliott CurrieEmail author
Chapter
  • 23 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Risk, Crime and Society book series (PSRCS)

Abstract

In the United States today, it is hard to escape the sense that we are living in a society saturated by risks—from random gun violence to devastating forest fires to disasters related to crumbling infrastructure. There is a striking disconnect between this reality of pervasive risk and the tendency in some quarters to look at risk through a social constructionist lens that often regards risks as routinely exaggerated. We often point to a growing intolerance of risk, which generates new or intensified forms of intrusive control and is rooted in an essentially irrational longing for a “golden age” when life was more predictable and more stable.

I argue that this perspective fails to grasp the unexpected precariousness and danger of everyday life for many people in many parts of the world. We live in an era in which we are asked to accept as normal risks that in fact are neither normal nor necessary—dangers that we have the material and technological resources to remedy, or at least to substantially reduce. Those “excess” or “surplus” risks are a hallmark of an increasingly heedless version of capitalism—a signal of profound social failure, and one of the defining social issues of our time. That failure offers an opening for transformative social action—if we are willing to seize it. I explore these issues through the lens of two risks that are unusually prevalent in the United States today—racialized inner-city violence and mass shootings.

Keywords

Climate change Mass shootings Racial disparities Social Constructionism Mental illness United States Homicide Risk denial 

References

  1. Currie, E (2019). “Getting crime right: framing everyday violence in the age of Trump.” In Walter S. DeKeseredy and Elliott Currie, eds., Progressive justice in an age of repression: strategies for challenging the rise of the right. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  2. Donnermeyer, J (2019). “Social change and drugs: rural American and the rise of Donald Trump.” In Walter S. DeKeseredy and Elliott Currie, eds., Progressive justice in an age of repression: strategies for challenging the rise of the right. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 42–60.Google Scholar
  3. Doroshow, D (2019). “We need to stop focusing on the mental health of mass shooters.” Washington Post, May 20.Google Scholar
  4. Follman, M, Aronsen G, and Pan D (2019). “U.S. mass shootings, 1982–2019: data from Mother Jones’ investigation.” Mother Jones Magazine. Retrieved from https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootongs-mother-jones-full-data/, June 27.
  5. Grynshteyn, E, and Hemenway D (2016). “Violent death rates: the U.S. compared with other high-income OECD countries.” American Journal of Medicine, 129 (3), 266–273.Google Scholar
  6. Healy, S, and Margolis, G (2012). “Myth: college campuses are unsafe.” The Presidency, American Council on Education, Spring. Retrieved from www.acenet.edu, April 2019.
  7. Krugman, P (2018). “A party defined by its lies.” New York Times, November 1.Google Scholar
  8. Los Angeles Times. (2019). “No retreat on mental health.” Editorial, June 11.Google Scholar
  9. Merkel, I, and Pittari, M (2019). Guns, crime, and corruption: Bolsonaro’s first month in office.” NACLA Newsletter, February 7.Google Scholar
  10. Meszaros, J (2017). “Falling through the cracks: the decline of mental health care and firearm violence.” Journal of Mental Health, 26 (4), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Moutier, C (2018). “Debunking the myth of violence and mental illness.” American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, March 7. Retrieved from https://afsp.org.
  12. Stossel, J (2007). “The school violence myth.” ABC News, April 18. Retrieved from abcnews.go.com.
  13. Winlow, S, Hall, S, and Treadwell, T (2017) The rise of the right: English nationalism and the transformation of working-class politics. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Criminology, Law and SocietyUniversity of California IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations