Advertisement

Sampling Errors, Bias, and Objectivity

  • David M. FlintonEmail author
Chapter
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

The basis of any good piece of research is making sure you have sampled correctly and avoided bias. In this chapter the need for sampling is considered. The more commonly used methods of obtaining a sample in quantitative research are reviewed. The importance of a sample reflecting the population, and the various forms of bias that might arise because of study design with particular reference to health research, are discussed. Random and systematic errors and how they affect the data being collected are discussed. An overview of considerations are taken into account when looking at sample size and power is included. The concepts of reliability and validity are discussed along with common methods of establishing reliability and validity of measurement.

Keywords

Sample size Reliability Validity Systematic error Random error Power 

References

  1. 1.
    Gleason CE, Dowling NM, Friedman E, Wharton W, Asthana S. Using predictors of hormone therapy use to model the healthy user bias: how does healthy user status influence cognitive effects of hormone therapy? Menopause. 2012;19(5):524–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts RS, Spitzer WO, Delmore T, Sackett DL. An empirical demonstration of Berkson’s bias. J Chronic Dis. 1978;31:119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Latkin CA, Mai VT, Ha TV, Sripaipan T, Zelaya C, Minh NL, Morales G, Go VF. Socially desirability response bias and other factors that may influence self-reports of substance use and HIV risk behaviors: a qualitative study of drug users in Vietnam. AIDS Educ Prev. 2016;28(5):417–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Culpepper RA, Zimmerman RA. Culture-based extreme response bias in surveys employing variable response items: an investigation of response tendency among Hispanic-Americans. J Int Bus Res Arden. 2006;5(2):75–83.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van Herk H, Poortinga Y, Verhallen TMM. Response styles in rating scales. Evidence of method bias in data from six EU countries. J Cross-Cult Psychol. 2004;35(3):251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.Google Scholar
  2. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.Google Scholar
  3. Petrie A, Sabin S. Medical statistics at a glance. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2009.Google Scholar
  4. Web Resources

    1. There are a number of web pages that deal with sampling and probability, including some with Java applications. Other useful resource on the web are random number generators.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Health SciencesCity, University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations