Advertisement

Determination of Factors of Professional Health Risk of Engineering Workers

  • Ekaterina TrushkovaEmail author
  • Elena Omelchenko
Conference paper
  • 44 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1116)

Abstract

The article presents the regularities of the formation of risk of occupational diseases of the working population in the engineering of individual forms of professional pathology. The calculations were performed using the methodology developed using the principles of the International Labour Organisation and World Health Organization on study of adverse workers health effects, caused by exposure of harmful and dangerous factors of the production environment. There are also used approaches to occupational risk assessment. It was found that the total occupational risks among workers of surveyed sectors are high enough. There was used a methodology based on a systematic approach to technology assessment of health risk from occupational exposure. The object of the study was typical for this industry engine-building association in one of the Russian cities. The greatest number of healthy employees was found in the group III (ETW) without the influence of unfavorable factors of production, which is characteristic for members of groups I and II. Using the methodology of risk assessment, it is possible to determine the safe working period under the influence of adverse factors of industrial environment.

Keywords

Occupational diseases Occupational hazards Coal industry Engineering Risk 

References

  1. 1.
    Saenko, N.R., Prokhorova, V.V., Ilyina, O.V., Ivanova, E.V.: Service management in the tourism and hospitality industry. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 15(11), 207–217 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Churkin, V.I., Kalinina, O.V.: Estimation of excess burden of labor taxation in Russia. Actual Probl. Econ. 184(10), 278–282 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kalinina, O.V., Lopatin, M.V.: Strategic and innovative aspects of transition to progressive scale in income taxation. Actual Probl. Econ. 182(8), 392–405 (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sergeev, S., Kirillova, T., Krasyuk, I.: Modelling of sustainable development of megacities under limited resources. E3S Web Conf. 91, 05007 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kosnikov, S.N., Khaibullina, I.V., Ignatskaya, M.A., Bakharev, V.V., Pinchuk, V.N.: Characteristic of economic indicators of reproduction of fixed capital. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 15(13), 243–253 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Denisov, E.I.: Problem of real efficiency of individual protection and the introduced risk for health of workers medicine of work and industrial ecology, no. 4, pp. 18–25 (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zakharenkov, V.V.: Estimation of professional risk for health of employees of the industrial enterprises on the basis of medical technology. Acad. Mag. W. Siberia, 9, 2(45), 8 (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kislitsyna, O.A.: Absence in the sphere of work of workers in Russia as risk factor of bad health and behavior with risk for health: gender aspect. Manag. Health Care 1(43), 66–77 (2015)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pushenko, S.L., Deundyak, D.V., Omelchenko, E.V., Nihaeva, A.V., Pushenko, A.S., Trushkova, E.A., Staseva, E.V., Fedina, E.V., Fil, E.S.: Health and Safety. Part 2 Production Sanitation and Health: Textbook. Height. State. Building. University Press, Rostov n/D (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omelchenko, E.V., Trushkova, E.A., Sidelnikov, M.V., Pushenko, S.L., Staseva, E.V.: Algorithm research exposure dust emissions enterprises of building production on the environment. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 50, Article no. 012018 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Don State Technical UniversityRostov-on-DonRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations