Advertisement

Selection of the Variant of the Aluminium-Glass Facade Implementation Using the AHP Method

  • Agnieszka LeśniakEmail author
  • Damian Wieczorek
  • Monika Górka
Conference paper
  • 44 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1116)

Abstract

The image of the whole building is primarily its shape, external casing and materials used. The investor has to make a decision already at the moment of preparing the design concept, in which technology and materials the office building or service and commercial object is to be made. Heavy concrete construction has disappeared over the years. Investors decide to use lightweight materials, such as aluminium and glass, to give buildings a light form and to avoid disturbing the architecture of the surrounding urban planning. The multitude of aluminium and glass facade systems offered by the manufacturers makes the investor face a difficult choice of such a system that will meet his or her expectations. The aim of the paper is to describe and evaluate the aluminium and glass facade systems offered by the manufacturers. The analysis was performed for three variants: mullion and transom system, semi-structural system and structural system. A model supporting the decision to choose an appropriate variant based on the identified criteria and multi-criteria Analytic Hierarchy Process method (AHP) was proposed.

Keywords

Aluminium-glass facade Analytic Hierarchy Process method 

References

  1. 1.
    Jocovic, M., et al.: Trans. Tech. Public 678, 644–647 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Plebankiewicz, E., Juszczyk, M., Malara, J.: Estimation of task implementation time using the PERT method on the example of a real building project. Arch. Civ. Eng. 61(3), 51–62 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anysz, H., Buczkowski, B.: Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 16(9), 5369–5374 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juszczyk, M.: The challenges of nonparametric cost estimation of construction works with the use of artificial intelligence tools. Proc. Eng. 196, 415–422 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Juszczyk, M., Zima, K., Lelek, W.: J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 25(7), 715–729 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wieczorek, D., Plebankiewicz, E., Zima, K.: Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 25(1), 20–38 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Leśniak, A., Zima, K.: Comparison of traditional and ecological wall systems using the AHP method. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management SGEM, Albena, Bulgaria, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 157–164 (2015)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krzemiński, M.: Comparison of selected multi-criteria assessment methods. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (ICNAAM 2015), vol. 1738, no. 1, p. 200004 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4951976
  9. 9.
    Anysz, H., Kaczorek, K.: The Conjugated Triangle Method CTM of the detection of inconsistent bids in the construction industry. In: MATEC Web of Conferences, vol. 219, p. 04003 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leśniak, A., Górka, M.: Evaluation of selected lightweight curtain wall solutions using multi criteria analysis. In: AIP Conference Proceedings (ICNAAM 2017), vol. 1978, no. 1, p. 240003 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1063/.1.5043864
  11. 11.
    Witkowski, K., et al.: Methods for determining potential sites for the location of logistics centres on the basis of multicriteria analysis. LogForum 14(3), 279–292 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2018.282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaty, T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saaty, T.L.: Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int. J. Serv. Sci. 1(1), 83–98 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leśniak, A., et al.: Symmetry 10(11), 642 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leśniak, A.: The simplified bidding decision model based on AHP method in ordering of investor’s supervision service. In: International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management SGEM, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 501–508 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leśniak, A., Górka, M.: Analysis of the cost structure of aluminum and glass facades. In: Al Ali, M., Platko, P. (eds.) Advances and Trends in Engineering Sciences and Technologies III. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2019). ISBN 978-0-367-07509-5Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cracow University of TechnologyCracowPoland

Personalised recommendations