Advertisement

Adequacy of Public Pension Systems

  • Beatriz Rosado-CebrianEmail author
  • Marta Peris-Ortiz
  • Carlos Rueda-Armengot
Chapter
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Pensions are the main source of income in old age. Their main value is provided, in most countries, by public pension systems. Therefore, one of the main challenges for governments and policymakers is to enable people to smooth consumption over the life cycle in an appropriate scale. This implies that pensions must be sufficient to prevent poverty and social exclusion, or even to provide enough income allowing to maintain the previous standard of living, and also to limit the gender gap between men and women. In recent years there has been a wave of reforms of public pension systems with the main objective to improve their financial sustainability both in the medium and long term. Many of the measures carried out within these reforms have negative effects on the adequacy of pension systems because they involve, in one way or another, e.g. a decrease in the replacement rate, a lower indexation. Therefore, reconciling the objectives of sustainability and adequacy is a priority challenge for pension policymakers in the coming years. Because of that, the aim of this chapter is to explore the concept of adequacy, different means of its measurement, the indicators used in cross-country studies on adequacy and how that measurement at different moments of time can help to take action in one way or another.

Keywords

Public pension systems Pension policy Adequacy Sustainability Replacement rate Indexation Rate of coverage 

References

  1. Bajtelsmit, V., Rappaport, A., & Foster, L. (2013). Measures of retirement benefit adequacy: Which, why, for whom, and how much?. Society of Actuaries, 2013–1.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, J., Blundel, R., & Tanner, S. (1998). Is there a retirement-savings puzzle? The American Economic Review, 88(4), 769–788.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, J., Emmerson, C., Oldfield, Z., & Tetlow, G. (2005). Prepared for retirement? The adequacy of retirement resources and distribution in England. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernheim, B. D., Forni, L., Gokhale, J., & Kotlikoff, L. J. (2000). How much Should Americans be saving for retirement? American Economic Review, 90(2), 288–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. (2006). Simplification and saving. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers Series, Working Paper 12659, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  6. Biggs, A. G., & Springstead, G. (2008). Alternate measures of replacement rates for social security benefits and retirement income. Social Security Bulletin, 68(2).Google Scholar
  7. Binswanger, J., & Schunk, D. (2011). What is an adequate standard of living during retirement? Journal of Pension Economics and Finance., 11, 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blancas, J., Contreras, I., & Ramirez, J. (2011). Construcción de indicadores sintéticos: una aproximación para maximizar la discriminación. Annals of ASEPUMA, no. 19–0110.Google Scholar
  9. Brugiavini, A., Maser, K., & Sunden, A. (2005), Measuring pension wealth. Paper prepared for a meeting of the Luxembourg Wealth Study held in January 2005: http://www.lisproject.org/lws/introduction/files/brugiavini_rev.pdf.
  10. Chlon-Dominczak, A. (2016). Impact of Changes in multi-pillar systems in EEC Countries board individually on board wealth. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474747216000238.
  11. Chybalski, F. (2012). Measuring the multidimensional adequacy of pension systems in European countries. Discussion Paper PI-1204, March 2012. The Pension Institute, London. http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1204.pdf.
  12. Chybalski, P., & Marcinkiewicz, E. (2015). The replacement rate: An imperfect indicator of pension adequacy in cross-country analyses. Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duran-Heras, A. (2012). The Spanish pensions are adequate? Activities of the Social Protection Committee of the EU for evaluation. Budget and Public Expenditure 68/2012, (pp. 141–156). Madrid: Institute for Fiscal Studies.Google Scholar
  14. European Commission (2003). Joint report by the commission and the council on adequate and sustainable pensions. (COM(2002) 737 - 2003/2040(INI))Google Scholar
  15. European Commission, EC (2012a). White Paper: An Agenda for adequate, safe and sustainable pensions. SWD-2012.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission, EC (2012b). Pension adequacy in the European Union 2010-2050. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion of the European Commission and the Social Protection Committee, European Union, Publications Office, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  17. Fang, C., Brown, C., & Weir, D. (2016). Cohort changes in social security benefits and pension wealth. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Retirement Research Center (MRRC) Working Paper WP 2016–350.Google Scholar
  18. Fornero, E., Lusardi, A., & Monticone, C. (2009). Adequacy of saving for Old Age in Europe. In Aging, Health and Pensions in Europe (pp. 13–41). Springer and European Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Grech, A. G. (2013). How best to measure pension adequacy, CASE paper 172, London Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, April 2013.Google Scholar
  20. Harmer, J. & Australia Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (2008). Pension review background paper. Canberra: Dept. of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. Holzman, R. & Hinz, R. (2005). Old-age income support in the twenty-first century: An International Perspective on Pension Systems and Reform. World Bank papers.Google Scholar
  22. International Labour Organization, ILO. (1998). Pension model ILO: A technical guide. Geneva: Financial, Actuarial and Statistical Services.Google Scholar
  23. Lusardi, A., & Mitchel, O. (2007). Financial literacy and retirement planning: New evidence from the Rand American Life Panel. Michigan Retirement Research Center Research Paper No. WP 2007–157.Google Scholar
  24. Mercer. (2016). Melbourne Mercer global pension index. Melbourne: Australian Centre for Financial Studies and Mercer.Google Scholar
  25. Munnell, A., Haverstick, K., & Sazenbacher, G. (2006). Job tenure and coverage board. CRR WP 2006–18. Center for Retirement Research at Boston College.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (2007). Pensions at a glance: Public policies across OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. OECD. (2009). Pensions at a glance 2009: Retirement income systems in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. OECD. (2011). Pensions at a glance 2011: Retirement - income systems in OECD and G20 Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. OECD (2012): OECD Pensions Outlook 2012. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. OECD. (2013). Pensions at a glance: OECD indicators and G20. Paris: OECD Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. OECD. (2015). Pensions at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators and G20. Paris: OECD Publishing (updated 2016).Google Scholar
  32. OECD. (2017). Net pension wealth (indicator).  https://doi.org/10.1787/c634eb4f-en in (Accessed on 19 January 2017).
  33. Rajevska, O. (2016). Adequacy and equity of pensions as a function of institutional system board design: A case of the Baltic States. Doctoral Thesis. Riga, 2016.Google Scholar
  34. Saisana, M., & Tarantola, S. (2002). State-of-the-Art Report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. Joint Research Centre - European Commission.Google Scholar
  35. Skinner, J. (2007). Are you sure you’re saving enough for retirement? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers Series, Working Paper 12981, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  36. Thaler, R. (1994). Psychology and savings policy. American Economic Review Papers and the Proceedings, 84(2), 186–192.Google Scholar
  37. Van Derhie, J. (2006). Measuring retirement income adequacy: Calculating realistic income replacement rates. EBRI Issues Briefs No. 297, September 2006, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  38. Whiteford, P., & Henman, P. (1998). Assessing budget standards: conceptual issues in the treatment of durables. Social Security Journal, 1.Google Scholar
  39. World Bank. (1994). Averting the old age crisis (p. 295). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Beatriz Rosado-Cebrian
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marta Peris-Ortiz
    • 2
  • Carlos Rueda-Armengot
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Financial Economics and AccountingUniversity of ExtremaduraCáceresSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de Organización de EmpresasUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations