Advertisement

The Role of Complementary Pensions

  • Mercedes AyusoEmail author
  • Montserrat Guillen
  • Diego Valero
Chapter
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Recent reforms of public pension systems implemented in various countries, including Spain, have sought to ensure the sustainability of benefits. However, achieving a structural budget balance (i.e. long-run equality between income and expenditure) may result in a decrease in the replacement rate or in the percentage that the pension represents of the last salary. The development of complementary pension schemes, both occupational and personal, is presented as a feasible alternative for increasing the adequacy of benefits. However, both systems face significant challenges in their further implementation, with business structures, on occasions, being highly concentrated in small and medium enterprises and under the significant influence of longevity, inflation and interest rate risks. This chapter presents a comprehensive analysis of the possibilities offered by the second and the third pillars to complement public pension systems and their possible innovations for increasing their level of penetration in different countries.

Keywords

Sufficiency Notional defined contribution Occupational pension schemes Individual pension schemes Defined contribution schemes Defined benefit schemes Defined ambition schemes Behavioural economics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by ICREA Academia, the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness and the ERDF under grants ECO2015-66314-R and ECO2016-76203-C2-2-P.

References

  1. Acuña, R., Palomino, M., Villar, L., Villagómez, A., & Valero, D. (2015). Cómo fortalecer los sistemas de pensiones latinoamericanos. Experiencias, lecciones y propuestas. Sura Asset Management, Estudio Internacional, Tomo I.Google Scholar
  2. Ambachtsheer, K. (2013). Designing ‘Defined Ambition’ pensions plans. A Frame for discussion. Rotman ICPM (International Centre for Pension Management). Rotman School of Management, 5(2).Google Scholar
  3. Antolín, P. (2008a). Ageing and the payout phase of pensions, annuities and financial markets. OECD, Working Paper Series in Insurance and Private Pensions, 29.Google Scholar
  4. Antolín, P. (2008b). Policy options for the payout phase. OECD, Working Paper Series in Insurance and Private Pensions, 25.Google Scholar
  5. Antolín, P. (2013). The OECD roadmap for the good design of defined contribution pension plans. OECD DAF/FIN Pension Unit.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, N. (2006). Non-financial defined contribution pensions: Mapping the terrain. In R. Holzmann & E. Palmer (Eds.), Pension reform: Issues and prospects for non-financial defined contribution (NDC) schemes (pp. 57–69). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  7. Barr, N., & Diamond, P. A. (2010). Pension reform. A short guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Benartzi, S., Previtero, A., & Thaler, R. H. (2011). Annuitization puzzles. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berstein, S., Morales, M., & Puente, A. (2015). Rol de un seguro de longevidad en América Latina: Casos de Chile, Colombia, México y Perú. Federación Internacional de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (FIAP), Octubre. Available from: http://www.fiapinternacional.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/rol_de_un_seguro_de_longevidad_en_latam_casos_chile__colombia__mexico_y_peru__octubre_2015_.pdf.
  11. Blake, D. (2014). The consequences of not having to buy an annuity (Discussion Paper PI-1409). Pensions Institute, Cass Business School, City University. Available from: http://www.pensions-institute.org/workingpapers/wp1409.pdf.
  12. Blake, D., & Boardman, T. (2010). Spend more today: Using behavioural economics to improve retirement expenditure decisions (Discussion Paper PI-1014). The Pensions Institute, British Library.Google Scholar
  13. Blake, D., & Dowd, K. (2013). Good practice principles in modelling defined contribution pension plans. London: Pensions Institute, Cass Business School.Google Scholar
  14. Department of Work and Pensions. (2012). Reinvigorating workplace pensions. London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  15. European Commission (EC). (2015). The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013–2060). European Economy 3/2015. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/european_economy/2015/pdf/ee3_en.pdf.
  16. Federación Internacional de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (FIAP). (2015). Modalidades de Pensión en los Sistemas de Capitalización Individual. FIAP, Nota de Pensiones, 6, Septiembre. Available from: http://www.fiapinternacional.org/nota-de-pensiones-no-6-modalidades-de-pension-en-los-sistemas-de-capitalizacion-individual/.
  17. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Groux.Google Scholar
  18. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nash, J. F. (1950). The bargaining problem. Econometrica, 18, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. National Employment Savings Trust Corporation (NEST). (2013). Annual report and accounts 2013 to 2014. London: NEST Corporation. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-employment-savings-trust-corporation-annual-report-and-accounts-2013-to-2014.
  21. O’Brien, C., Fenn, P., & Diacon, S. (2005). How long do people expect to live? Results and implications. Centre for Risk and Insurance Studies, Nottingham University Business School. CRIS Research Report 2005–1. Available from: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/business/businesscentres/crbfs/documents/cris-reports/cris-paper-2005-1.pdf.
  22. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Pensions at a Glance 2013: OECD and G20 indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available from: http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/finance-and-investment/pensions-at-a-glance-2013_pension_glance-2013-en.
  23. Taleb, N. (2012). Antifragille. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2004). Save more tomorrow: Using behavioural economics to increase employee saving. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 164–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Tzu, L. (2016). Tao Te Ching. United States: Wisehouse Classics Edition.Google Scholar
  27. United Nations. (2013). World population prospects: The 2012 revision. Population Division, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, New York. Available from: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Publications/Files/WPP2012_HIGHLIGHTS.pdf.
  28. Valero, D. (2013). Tendencias en materia de pensiones privadas. El papel de las rentas vitalicias. In J. A. Herce (Ed.), Pensiones: una reforma medular (pp. 175–189). Madrid: Fundación de Estudios Financieros y Círculo de Empresarios.Google Scholar
  29. Valero, D. (2015). Neuroeconomía y Economía del comportamiento de pensiones. Livro Técnico Congresso 2015, Asociación Brasileña de Administradoras de Fondos de Pensiones (ABRAPP).Google Scholar
  30. Van Galen, T., Kocken, T., & Lundbergh, S. (2014). Demystifying pension design: Clearer principles Foster. Better practices. Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 7(2), 1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mercedes Ayuso
    • 1
    Email author
  • Montserrat Guillen
    • 1
  • Diego Valero
    • 2
  1. 1.Riskcenter, Department of Econometrics, University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.University of BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations