Skip to main content

A Model-Based Combination Language for Scheduling Verification

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1161))

  • 690 Accesses

Abstract

Cyber-Physical Systems (CPSs) are built upon discrete software and hardware components, as well as continuous physical components. Such heterogeneous systems involve numerous domains with competencies and expertise that go far beyond traditional software engineering: systems engineering. In this paper, we explore a model-based approach for systems engineering that advocates the composition of several heterogeneous artifacts (called views) into a sound and consistent system model. A model combination Language is proposed for this purpose. Thus, rather than trying to build the universal language able to capture all possible aspects of systems, the proposed language proposes to relate small subsets of languages in order to offer specific analysis capabilities while keeping a global consistency between all joined models. We demonstrate the interest of our approach through an industrial process based on Capella, which provides (among others) a large support for functional analysis from requirements to components deployment. Even though Capella is already quite expressive, it lacks support for schedulability analysis. AADL is also a language dedicated to system analysis. If it is backed with advanced schedulability tools, it lacks support for functional analysis. Thus, instead of proposing ways to add missing aspects in either Capella or AADL, we rather extract a relevant subset of both languages to build a view adequate for conducting schedulability analysis of Capella functional models. Finally, our combination language is generic enough to extract pertinent subsets of languages and combine them to build views for different experts. It also helps maintaining a global consistency between different modeling views.

This work was financially Supported by the CLARITY project and by a UCN@Sophia Labex scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://osate.org/index.html.

  2. 2.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backus--Naur_form.

References

  1. Apel, S., Mauch, M., Schau, V.: Model-driven engineering tool comparison for architectures within heterogenic systems for electric vehicle. In: 2016 4th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD), pp. 671–676, February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  2. Behjati, R., Yue, T., Nejati, S., Briand, L., Selic, B.: Extending SysML with AADL concepts for comprehensive system architecture modeling. In: France, R.B., Kuester, J.M., Bordbar, B., Paige, R.F. (eds.) ECMFA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6698, pp. 236–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21470-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brun, M., Vergnaud, T., Faugere, M., Delatour, J.: From UML to AADL: an explicit execution semantics modelling with MARTE. In: ERTS 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. De Saqui-Sannes, P., Hugues, J.: Combining SysML and AADL for the design, validation and implementation of critical systems. In: ERTS2 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Degueule, T., Combemale, B., Blouin, A., Barais, O., Jezequel, J.M.: Melange: a meta-language for modular and reusable development of DSLs. In: Conference on Software Language Engineering, pp. 25–36. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elaasar, M., Noyrit, F., Badreddin, O., Gérard, S.: Reducing UML modeling tool complexity with architectural contexts and viewpoints. In: MODELSWARD, pp. 129–138 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ergin, H., Syriani, E., Gray, J.: Design pattern oriented development of model transformations. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 46, 106–139 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Feiler, P.H., Gluch, D.P.: Model-Based Engineering with AADL: An Introduction to the SAE Architecture Analysis & Design Language. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Garlan, D.: Modeling challenges for CPS systems. In: 2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems, p. 1, May 2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/SEsCPS.2015.8

  10. Group, O.M.: OMG Systems Modeling Language, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  11. Haber, A., et al.: Integration of heterogeneous modeling languages via extensible and composable language components. In: 2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD), pp. 19–31, February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  12. Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Modeling Languages: Syntax, Semantics and All That Stuff, Part I: The Basic Stuff (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jezequel, J.M.: Model driven design and aspect weaving. Softw. Syst. Model. 7(2), 209–218 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kurtev, I., Schuts, M., Hooman, J., Swagerman, D.J.: Integrating interface modeling and analysis in an industrial setting. In: MODELSWARD, pp. 345–352 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, E.A.: Cyber physical systems: design challenges. In: 2008 11th IEEE International Symposium on Object and Component-Oriented Real-Time Distributed Computing, pp. 363–369. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marcé, L., Singhoff, F., Legrand, J., Nana, L.: Scheduling and memory requirements analysis with AADL. In: SIGAda, pp. 1–10. ACM (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCracken, D.D., Reilly, E.D.: Backus-Naur Form (BNF) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. OMG: OMG Unified Modeling Language, April 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ouni, B., Gaufillet, P., Jenn, E., Hugues, J.: Model Driven Engineering with Capella and AADL (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ramos, R., Barais, O., Jézéquel, J.-M.: Matching model-snippets. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 121–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75209-7_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Scippacercola, F., Pietrantuono, R., Russo, S., Zentai, A.: Model-driven engineering of a railway interlocking system. In: 2015 3rd International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development (MODELSWARD), pp. 509–519, February 2015

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singhoff, F., Legrand, J., Nana, L., Marcé, L.: Cheddar - a flexible real time scheduling framework. In: SIGAda, pp. 1–8 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stahl, T., Voelter, M., Czarnecki, K.: Model-Driven Software Development: Technology, Engineering, Management. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suri, K., Cuccuru, A., Cadavid, J., Gérard, S., Gaaloul, W., Tata, S.: Model-based development of modular complex systems for accomplishing system integration for industry 4.0. In: MODELSWARD, pp. 487–495 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Turki, S., Senn, E., Blouin, D.: Mapping the MARTE UML profile to AADL. In: ACES-MB, pp. 11–20 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, J., Wang, J.: A new early warning method of train tracking interval based on CTC. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao, H., Apvrille, L., Mallet, F.: Meta-models combination for reusing verification techniques. In: 7th International Conference on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development, pp. 39–50. SCITEPRESS-Science and Technology Publications (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Ning, B., Jiang, H.: Train-ground communication in CBTC based on 802.11 b: design and performance research. In: CMC 2009, pp. 368–372. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Zhao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zhao, H., Apvrille, L., Mallet, F. (2020). A Model-Based Combination Language for Scheduling Verification. In: Hammoudi, S., Pires, L., Selić, B. (eds) Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development. MODELSWARD 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1161. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37873-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37873-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37872-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37873-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics