Advertisement

Virtual Reality Becoming Part of Our Lives—Assessing Consumers’ Perceived Applicability of Virtual Reality Supported Tasks and a Critical Reflection on the Development

  • Marc HerzEmail author
  • Vanessa Rahe
Chapter
  • 19 Downloads
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

With virtual reality technology rapidly advancing, virtual reality glasses can be used for a growing number of tasks and thus become increasingly integrated in consumers’ lives. The present study reanalyzes an existing dataset from a quantitative study with 611 German consumers to assesses their perceived applicability of virtual reality glasses in various tasks. Further, this study identifies situations and explores the relationship of virtual reality tasks with attitudes and purchase intention of virtual reality glasses. Finally, the present paper offers a critical reflection on the increasing adoption of technology in our everyday lives from an ethical and sociological perspective and offers impulses for future research.

Keywords

Virtual reality Tasks Critical reflection of technology 

References

  1. Cameirão, M. S., i Badia, S. B., Oller, E. D., & Verschure, P. F. (2010). Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based rehabilitation gaming system: Methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 7(1), 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chuah, S. H. W. (2019). Wearable XR-technology: Literature review, conceptual framework and future research directions. International Journal of Technology Marketing. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
  3. Craig, A. B., Sherman, W. R., & Will, J. D. (2009). Developing virtual reality applications: Foundations of effective design. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Freina, L., & Ott, M. (2015). A literature review on immersive virtual reality in education: State of the art and perspectives. In The International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education (vol. 1, p. 133). “Carol I” National Defence University.Google Scholar
  6. Han, D. I. D., & Dieck, T. (2019). Calling for user-centric VR design research in hospitality and tourism. Hospitality & Society, 9(2), 237–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Han, D. I. D., Weber, J., Bastiaansen, M., Mitas, O., & Lub, X. (2019). Virtual and augmented reality technologies to enhance the visitor experience in cultural tourism. Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 113–128). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayhurst, J. (2018). How augmented reality and virtual reality is being used to support people living with dementia—design challenges and future directions. Augmented reality and virtual reality (pp. 295–305). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Herz, M., & Brunk, K. H. (2017). Conceptual advances in consumers’ semantic and episodic brand memories: A mixed methods exploration. Psychology & Marketing, 34(1), 70–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herz, M., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2019). Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: The role of media, fashion and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 228–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S. S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kalantari, M. (2017). Consumers’ adoption of wearable technologies: Literature review, synthesis, and future research agenda. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 12(3), 274–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lu, H. P., Hsu, C. L., & Hsu, H. Y. (2005). An empirical study of the effect of perceived risk upon intention to use online applications. Information Management & Computer Security, 13(2), 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rauschnabel, P. A. (2018). Virtually enhancing the real world with holograms: An exploration of expected gratifications of using augmented reality smart glasses. Psychology & Marketing, 35(8), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., & Hinsch, C. (2019). Augmented reality marketing: How mobile AR-apps can improve brands through inspiration. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rauschnabel, P. A., He, J., & Ro, Y. K. (2018). Antecedents to the adoption of augmented reality smart glasses: A closer look at privacy risks. Journal of Business Research, 92, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rauschnabel, P. A., & Ro, Y. K. (2016). Augmented reality smart glasses: An investigation of technology acceptance drivers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 11(2), 123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rendon, A. A., Lohman, E. B., Thorpe, D., Johnson, E. G., Medina, E., & Bradley, B. (2012). The effect of virtual reality gaming on dynamic balance in older adults. Age and Ageing, 41(4), 549–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sachs, G. (2016). Virtual and augmented reality: Understanding the race for the next computing platform (pp. 1–56). Retrieved from: http://www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/pages/technology-driving-innovation-folder/virtual-and-augmentedreality/report.pdf. Last retrieved on August 28, 2019.
  21. Shelstad, W. J., Smith, D. C., & Chaparro, B. S. (2017, September). Gaming on the rift: How virtual reality affects game user satisfaction. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 2072–2076). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  22. Slater, M., Spanlang, B., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Blanke, O. (2010). First person experience of body transfer in virtual reality. PLoS ONE, 5(5), e10564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vorderer, P., Hefner, D., Reinecke, L., & Klimmt, C. (Eds.). (2018). Permanently online, permanently connected: Living and communicating in a POPC world. New York, London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
  25. Yang, H., Yu, J., Zo, H., & Choi, M. (2016). User acceptance of wearable devices: An extended perspective of perceived value. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 256–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kleinundpläcking GmbHBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Hochschule für Musik, Theater und Medien Hannover, Institut für Journalistik und KommunikationsforschungHanoverGermany

Personalised recommendations