Against the Current

  • Riccardo RosolinoEmail author


Although the world of law had adopted the idea that monopolies could cancel each other out, as conceived by the theologians, it gradually became more feeble and eventually disappeared. It was, after all, dually heterodox and certainly had no place in the physiocrats’ new image of the economic arena, in which the market itself would penalise those who perniciously pursued their own interests. This chapter demonstrates how original Smith’s reflections were compared to the current line of thought, setting a disenchanted pragmatism against optimistic convictions. It also aims to show how the old idea was formidably applied in Smith’s reasoning. The congenital weakness of the market laid it open to the partisan schemes of monopolist conspirators, but allowing such schemes to come up against a natural counterpart provided an excellent solution to one of the chief issues spawned by industrial capitalism.


  1. Braudel, F. 1982 [1979]. Civilization and Capitalism, 15th–18th Century, Vol. II: The Wheels of Commerce. London: William Collins Sons & Co.Google Scholar
  2. Brubaker, L. 2006. Does the ‘Wisdom of Nature’ Need Help? In New Voices on Adam Smith, ed. L. Montes and E. Schlisser, 168–192. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Cohn, G. 1895. Competition and Combination. The Economic Journal 20: 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Condorcet, J.A.N. 1847–1849a [1795]. Esquisse d’un tableau historique des progrès de l’esprit humain (Fragment de l’Histoire de la Xe époque). In Œuvres de Condorcet, publiées par A. Condorcet O’Connor et F. Arago, 12 vols., vol. 6. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
  5. Condorcet, J.A.N. 1847–1849b [1775]. Monopole et monopoleur. In Œuvres de Condorcet, publiées par A. Condorcet O’Connor et F. Arago, 12 vols., vol. 11. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
  6. Condorcet, J.A.N. 1847–1849c [1776]. Réflexions sur le commerce de blés. In Œuvres de Condorcet, publiées par A. Condorcet O’Connor et F. Arago, 12 vols., vol. 11. Paris: Didot.Google Scholar
  7. De Roover, R. 1974b [1955]. Scholastic Economics. Survival and Lasting Influence from the Sixteenth Century to Adam Smith. In R. De Roover, Business, Banking and Economic Thought in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe, ed. J. Kirshner, 306–335. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Dorfman, J. 1946. The Economic Mind in American Civilization, 1606–1865, 2 vols. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
  9. Forbes, D. 1966. Introduction. In A. Ferguson, An Essay on the History of Civil Society, ed. with an Introduction by D. Forbes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fox-Genovese, E. 1976. The Origin of Physiocracy. Economic Revolution and Social Order in Eighteenth-Century France. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ginzburg, C. 2018. Casuistry and Irony: Some Reflections on Pascal’s Provinciales. In A Historical Approach to Casuistry. Norms and Exceptions in a Comparative Perspective, ed. C. Ginzburg and L. Biasiori, 282–300. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Groenewegen, P.D. 2002a [1983]. Turgot, Beccaria and Smith. In P.D. Groenewegen, Eighteenth-Century Economics. Turgot, Beccaria and Their Contemporaries, 3–47. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Groenewegen, P.D. 2002b [1998]. Boisguilbert and Eighteenth-Century Economics. In P.D. Groenewegen, Eighteenth-Century Economics. Turgot, Beccaria and Their Contemporaries, 111–124. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Groenewegen, P.D. 2002c [1969]. Turgot and Adam Smith. In P.D. Groenewegen, Eighteenth-century Economics. Turgot, Beccaria and Their Contemporaries, 363–378. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Guery, A. 2011. Introduction. De Montchrestien à Cantillon: de l’économie politique à l’analyse économique. In Montchrestien et Cantillon. Le commerce et l’émergence d’une pensée économique, sous la direction de A. Guery, 7–55. Paris: ENS.Google Scholar
  16. Hirschman, A.O. 1977. The Passions and the Interests. Political Arguments for Capitalism Before Its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsen, A.R., and S. Toulmin. 1988. The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kaplan, S.L. 2017. Raisonner sur les blés. Essais sur les lumières économique. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
  19. Larrere, C. 1992. L’invention de l’économie au XVIIIe siècle. Du droit naturel à la physiocratie. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  20. Levy, D.M., and S. Peart. 2009. Adam Smith and the Place of Faction. In Elgar Companion to Adam Smith, ed. J.T. Joung, 335–345. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  21. Mayers, M.L. 1983. The Soul of Modern Economic Man. Ideas of Self-Interest, Thomas Hobbes to Adam Smith. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mizuta, H. 1967. Adam Smith’s Library. A Supplement to Bonar’s Catalogue with a Checklist of the Whole Library. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Ó Gráda, C. 2009. Famine. A Short History. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Perrot, J.-C. 1992. Une histoire intellectuelle de l’économie politique, XVIIe-XVIIIe siécle. Paris: EHESS.Google Scholar
  25. Pocock, J.G.A. 1985. Josiah Tucker on Burke, Locke, and Price. A Study in Varieties of Eighteenth-Century Conservatism. In J.G.A. Pocock, Virtue, Commerce, and History. Essays on Political Thought and History, Chiefly in Eighteenth Century, 157–191. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Pufendorf, S. 1729 [1672]. Of the Law of Nature and Nations, Eight Books. London: Walthoe, Wilkin, Bonwicke, Birt, Ward, Osborne.Google Scholar
  27. Rosanvallon, P. 1999 [1979]. Le capitalisme utopique. Histoire de l’idée de marché. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  28. Rothschild, E. 2001. Economic Sentiments. Adam Smith, Condorcet and the Enlightenment. London and Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Sampson, M. 1988. Laxity and Liberty in Seventeenth-Century English Political Thought. In Conscience and Casuistry in Early Modern Europe, ed. E. Leites, 72–118. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press/Editions MSH.Google Scholar
  30. Schumpeter, J.A. 2006 [1954]. History of Economic Analysis. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Shelton, G. 1981. Dean Tucker and Eighteenth-Century Economic and Political Thought. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, A. 1805 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (The Eleventh Edition; with Notes, Supplementary Chapters, and a Life of Dr. Smith, by William Playfair), 3 vols. London: Cadell and Davies.Google Scholar
  33. Smith, A. 1976 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, 2 vols., ed. R.H. Campbell and A.S. Skinner. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Steiner, P. 2006. Le débat sur la liberté du commerce des grains (1750–1775). In Histoire du libéralisme en Europe, sous la direction de P. Nemo and J. Petitot, 255–278. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
  35. Taylor, W.L. 1965. Francis Hutcheson and David Hume as Predecessors of Adam Smith. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, E.P. 1991 [1963]. The Making of the English Working Class. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  37. Tucker, J. 1931 [1755]. The Elements of Commerce and Theory of Taxes (A Preliminary Discourse, Setting Forth the natural Disposition, or instinctive Inclination of Mankind Towards Commerce). In J. Tucker, A Selection from His Economic and Political Writings, 55–219. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Turgot, A.R.J. 2011b [1759]. In Praise of Gournay. In The Turgot Collection. Writings, Speeches, and Letters of Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune, ed. D. Gordon, 100–127. Auburn: Mises Institute.Google Scholar
  39. Willis, K. 1979. The Role in Parliament of the Economic Ideas of Adam Smith, 1776–1800. History of Political Economy 11 (4): 505–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Winch, D. 1978. Adam Smith’s Politics. An Essay on Historiographic Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young, B.W. 1996. Christianity, Commerce and the Canon: Josiah Tucker and Richard Woodward on Political Economy. History of European Ideas 22: 384–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human and Social ScienceUniversity of Naples—L’OrientaleNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations