Advertisement

Phytophotodermatitis

  • Daniel A. Nguyen
  • Muneeza K. Muhammad
  • Grace L. LeeEmail author
Chapter
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

Phytophotodermatitis describes the phenomenon of human skin eruptions produced by photosensitizing plants and their extracts upon exposure to sunlight. The Greek origin of the word phyto means plant, photo means light, and dermatitis denotes inflammation of the skin. The various plants implicated are diverse and commonly include the Apiaceae, Rutaceae, Moraceae, and other plant families with active photosensitizing ingredients, mainly furocoumarins. When the furocoumarins are exposed to ultraviolet A (UVA) light, skin reactions of erythema, edema, and bullae with subsequent hyperpigmentation can develop. Phytophotodermatitis may be a difficult clinical diagnosis if proper history is not obtained. Treatment based on presentation may include debridement, dressing changes, analgesics, and steroids. Importance must be placed on avoidance of further plant toxin and UVA exposure.

Keywords

Furocoumarin Phytophotodermatitis Photodermatitis Phytodermatitis Phototoxic 

Abbreviations

PUVA

Psoralen and Ultraviolet A Radiation

ROS

Reactive Oxygen Species

UVA

Ultraviolet A Radiation

Notes

Declaration of Interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Informed Consent

Obtained written consent.

References

  1. 1.
    Klaber R. Phyto-photo-dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1942;54(7):193–211.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.1942.tb10682.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pathak MA, Fitzpatrick TB. The evolution of photochemotherapy with psoralens and UVA (PUVA): 2000 BC to 1992 AD. J Photochem Photobiol, B. 1992;14(1–2):3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bowers AG. Phytophotodermatitis. Am J Contact Dermat. 1999;10(2):89–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-199X(99)90006-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker BG, Bedford J, Kanitkar S. Keeping pace with the media; Giant Hogweed burns—a case series and comprehensive review. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2017;43(5):933–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.10.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giant hogweed ‘UK’s most dangerous plant’, say rivers trust. BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-manchester-33509053. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  6. 6.
    Chaudhary SK, Ceska O, Warrington PJ, Ashwood-Smith MJ. Increased furocoumarin content of celery during storage. J Agric Food Chem. 1985;33(6):1153–7.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00066a032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Son JH, Jin H, You HS, Shim WH, Kim JM, Kim GW, et al. Five cases of phytophotodermatitis caused by fig leaves and relevant literature review. Ann Dermatol. 2017;29(1):86–90.  https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2017.29.1.86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zangerl AR, Berenbaum MR. Increase in toxicity of an invasive weed after reassociation with its coevolved herbivore. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(43):15529–32.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507805102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Seligman PJ, Mathias CG, O’Malley MA, Beier RC, Fehrs LJ, Serrill WS, et al. Phytophotodermatitis from celery among grocery store workers. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(11):1478–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fu PP, Xia Q, Zhao Y, Wang S, Yu H, Chiang HM. Phototoxicity of herbal plants and herbal products. J Environ Sci Health, Part C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev. 2013;31(3):213–55.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2013.824206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rzymski P, Klimaszyk P, Poniedzialek B. Invasive giant hogweeds in Poland: Risk of burns among forestry workers and plant distribution. Burns. 2015;41(8):1816–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2015.06.007.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Knudsen EA, Kroon S. In vitro and in vivo phototoxicity of furocoumarin-containing plants. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1988;13(2):92–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfurtscheller K, Trop M. Phototoxic plant burns: report of a case and review of topical wound treatment in children. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31(6):e156–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Crosby DG. The poisoned weed: plants toxic to skin. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kabuce N, Priede N. NOBANIS—Invasive alien species fact sheet—Heracleum sosnowskyi. In: Online database of the European network on invasive alien species. NOBANIS; 2010. www.nobanis.org. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  16. 16.
    An I, Ozturk M. Phytodermatitis in east and southeast of Turkey: a prospective study. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15569527.2018.1561711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dufayet L, Langrand J. Phytophotodermatitis related to Peucedanum paniculatum Loisel, a case report. Contact Dermat. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.13185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bosanac SS, Clark AK, Sivamani RK. Phytophotodermatitis related to carrot extract-containing sunscreen. Derm Online J. 2018;24(1).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zhang RZ, Zhu WY. Phytophotodermatitis due to wild carrot decoction. Indian J Dermtol, Venereol Leprol. 2011;77(6):731.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0378-6323.86511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Izumi AK, Dawson KL. Zabon phytophotodermatitis: first case reports due to Citrus maxima. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(5 Suppl):S146–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Choi JY, Hwang S, Lee SH, Oh SH. Asymptomatic hyperpigmentation without preceding inflammation as a clinical feature of citrus fruits-induced phytophotodermatitis. Ann Dermatol. 2018;30(1):75–8.  https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2018.30.1.75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fitzpatrick JK, Kohlwes J. Lime-induced phytophotodermatitis. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(6):975.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-018-4315-z.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Friedman BT, Harper R, Glucksberg A, Strote J. In the limelight. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(3):504–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2015.11.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harshman J, Quan Y, Hsiang D. Phytophotodermatitis: rash with many faces. Can Fam Physician Med Fam Can. 2017;63(12):938–40.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kristiansen B, Penninga L, Diernaes JEF. Challenging cause of bullous eruption of the hands in the Arctic. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-225981.
  26. 26.
    Marcos LA, Kahler R. Phytophotodermatitis. Int J Infect Dis: IJID: Off Publ Int Soc Infect Dis. 2015;38:7–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2015.07.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matthews MR, VanderVelde JC, Caruso DM, Foster KN. Lemons in the arizona sunshine: the effects of furocoumarins leading to phytophotodermatitis and burn-like injuries. Wounds: Compend Clin Res Pract. 2017;29(12):E118–e24.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mioduszewski M, Beecker J. Phytophotodermatitis from making sangria: a phototoxic reaction to lime and lemon juice. CMAJ. 2015;187(10):756.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Raam R, DeClerck B, Jhun P, Herbert M. Phytophotodermatitis: the other “lime” disease. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(4):554–6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.02.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Safran T, Kanevsky J, Ferland-Caron G, Mereniuk A, Perreault I, Lee J. Blistering phytophotodermatitis of the hands after contact with lime juice. Contact Dermat. 2017;77(1):53–4.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.12728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schmitt AR, Bellamkonda VR. Man With Right Hand Bullae. Ann Emerg Med. 2016;67(4):553, 6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snaidr VA, Lowe PM. Phytophotodermatitis from lime juice. Med J Aust. 2017;207(8):328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Torres-Navarro I, Condino-Brito E, Botella-Estrada R. “Mojito’s” phytophotodermatitis, the other “lime” disease. Med Clin. 2018;151(1):44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2017.08.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Binder S, Hanakova A, Tomankova K, Pizova K, Bajgar R, Manisova B, et al. Adverse phototoxic effect of essential plant oils on NIH 3T3 cell line after UV light exposure. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2016;24(3):234–40.  https://doi.org/10.21101/cejph.a4354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Machado M, Vidal RL, Cardoso P, Coelho S. Phytophotodermatitis: a diagnosis to consider. BMJ case reports. 2015;2015.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-213388.
  36. 36.
    Cordoba S, Gonzalez M, Martinez-Moran C, Borbujo JM. Bullous phytophotodermatitis caused by an esoteric remedy. Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas. 2017;108(1):79–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2016.07.019.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gawkrodger DJ, Savin JA. Phytophotodermatitis due to common rue (Ruta graveolens). Contact Dermat. 1983;9(3):224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Booth B, Furzeland J. An unusual rash for Royal: a case series. J R Nav Med Serv. 2016;102(1):19–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mateus JE, Silva CD, Ferreira M, Porto J. Phytophotodermatitis: still a poorly recognised diagnosis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018;2018:bcr-2018-227859.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-227859.
  40. 40.
    Zaynoun ST, Aftimos BG, Abi Ali L, Tenekjian KK, Khalidi U, Kurban AK. Ficus carica; isolation and quantification of the photoactive components. Contact Dermat. 1984;11(1):21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rademaker M, Derraik JG. Phytophotodermatitis caused by Ficus pumila. Contact Dermat. 2012;67(1):53–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2012.02026.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Beattie PE, Dawe RS, Traynor NJ, Woods JA, Ferguson J, Ibbotson SH. Can St John’s wort (hypericin) ingestion enhance the erythemal response during high-dose ultraviolet al therapy? Br J Dermato. 2005;153(6):1187–91.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06946.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Hohmann N, Maus A, Carls A, Haefeli WE, Mikus G. St. John’s wort treatment in women bears risks beyond pharmacokinetic drug interactions. Arch Toxicol. 2016;90(4):1013–5.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-015-1532-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Napoli E, Siracusa L, Ruberto G, Carrubba A, Lazzara S, Speciale A, et al. Phytochemical profiles, phototoxic and antioxidant properties of eleven Hypericum species—a comparative study. Phytochemistry. 2018;152:162–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.05.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Alam F, Khan GN, Asad M. Psoralea corylifolia L: ethnobotanical, biological, and chemical aspects: a review. Phytother Res PTR. 2018;32(4):597–615.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.6006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Maurice PD, Cream JJ. The dangers of herbalism. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 1989;299(6709):1204-.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ozkol HU, Akdeniz N, Ozkol H, Bilgili SG, Calka O. Development of phytophotodermatitis in two cases related to Plantago lanceolata. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2012;31(1):58–60.  https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2011.584232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ozkol HU, Calka O, Akdeniz N, Pinar SM. Phytodermatitis in eastern Turkey: a retrospective, observational study. Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug. 2014;25(3):140–6.  https://doi.org/10.1097/der.0000000000000033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pyšek P, Chytry M, Pergl J, Sádlo J, Wild J. Plant invasions in the Czech Republic: current state, introduction dynamics, invasive species and invaded habitats. 2012.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Zavaleta E. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. SPIE; 2000.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lenkovic M, Cabrijan L, Gruber F, Saftic M, Stanic Zgombic Z, Stasic A, et al. Phytophotodermatitis in Rijeka region, Croatia. CollIum Antropol. 2008;32(Suppl 2):203–5.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zobel AM, Brown SA. Seasonal changes of furanocoumarin concentrations in leaves of Heracleum lanatum. J Chem Ecol. 1990;16(5):1623–34.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01014095.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zhang R, Zhu W. Phytophotodermatitis due to chinese herbal medicine decoction. Indian J Dermato. 2011;56(3):329–31.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.82498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Van Wyk B-E, Wink M. Phytomedicines, herbal drugs, and poisons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2014.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Dobson J, Ondhia C, Skellett AM, Coelho R. Image gallery: phototoxic rash from celery diet. Br J Dermato. 2016;175(5):e133.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Nakamura M, Henderson M, Jacobsen G, Lim HW. Comparison of photodermatoses in African-Americans and Caucasians: a follow-up study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2014;30(5):231–6.  https://doi.org/10.1111/phpp.12079.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kruse LL. Differential diagnosis of linear eruptions in children. Pediatr Ann. 2015;44(8):e194–8.  https://doi.org/10.3928/00904481-20150812-08.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Klimaszyk P, Klimaszyk D, Piotrowiak M, Popiolek A. Unusual complications after occupational exposure to giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum): a case report. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2014;27(1):141–4.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s13382-014-0238-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Reynolds NJ, Burton JL, Bradfield JWB, Matthews CNA. Weed wacker dermatitis. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(9):1419–20.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archderm.1991.01680080159028.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lane JE, Strauss MJ. Toilet water dermatitis: with especial reference to berlock dermatitis. J Am Med Assoc. 1930;95(10):717–9.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1930.02720100015005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Bonamonte D, Foti C, Lionetti N, Rigano L, Angelini G. Photoallergic contact dermatitis to 8-methoxypsoralen in Ficus carica. Contact Dermat. 2010;62(6):343–8.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01713.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Jakubska-Busse A, Michał Ś, Kobyłka M. Identification of bioactive components of essential oils in Heracleum sosnowskyi and Heracleum mantegazzianum (Apiaceae). 2013.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Carlsen K, Weismann K. Phytophotodermatitis in 19 children admitted to hospital and their differential diagnoses: Child abuse and herpes simplex virus infection. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;57(5 Suppl):S88–91.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gould JW, Mercurio MG, Elmets CA. Cutaneous photosensitivity diseases induced by exogenous agents. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(4):551–73; quiz 74-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Coffman K, Boyce WT, Hansen RC. Phytophotodermatitis simulating child abuse. Am J Dis Child. 1985;139(3):239–40.  https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.1985.02140050033015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sargent RL. Management of blisters in the partial-thickness burn: an integrative research review. J Burn Care Res Off Publ Am Burn Assoc. 2006;27(1):66–81.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bcr.0000191961.95907.b1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Probert SM, Lacey J, Gautam S. Giant Hogweed burns. Arch Dis Child. 2013;98(7):544.  https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2012-303229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Mill J, Wallis B, Cuttle L, Mott J, Oakley A, Kimble R. Phytophotodermatitis: case reports of children presenting with blistering after preparing lime juice. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2008;34(5):731–3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.11.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mandalia MR, Chalmers R, Schreuder FB. Contact with fig tree sap: an unusual cause of burn injury. Burns J Int Soc Burn Inj. 2008;34(5):719–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2007.03.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Chan JC, Sullivan PJ, O’Sullivan MJ, Eadie PA. Full thickness burn caused by exposure to giant hogweed: delayed presentation, histological features and surgical management. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg JPRAS. 2011;64(1):128–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.03.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Phytophototoxin Poisoning Treatment & Management. https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/817226-treatment. Accessed 2 Oct 2019.
  72. 72.
    Dean FM. Naturally Occurring Coumarins. In: Zechmeister L, editor. Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe (Progress in the Chemistry of Organic Natural Products/Progrès Dans La Chimie Des Substances Organiques Naturelles). Vienna: Springer Vienna; 1952. p. 225–91.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Murray RDH. Naturally occurring plant coumarins. In: Herz W, Grisebach H, Kirby GW, editors. Fortschritte der Chemie Organischer Naturstoffe (Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products). Vienna: Springer Vienna; 1978. p. 199–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Murray RDH. Naturally occurring plant coumarins. In: Herz W, Kirby GW, Steglich W, Tamm C, editors. Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe (Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products). Vienna: Springer Vienna; 1991. p. 83–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Murray RDH. Naturally occurring plant coumarins. Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe (Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products). Vienna: Springer Vienna; 1997. p. 1–119.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Murray RDH. The naturally occurring coumarins. In: Herz W, Falk H, Kirby GW, Moore RE, editors. Fortschritte der Chemie organischer Naturstoffe (Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products). Vienna: Springer Vienna; 2002. p. 1–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Sarker SD, Nahar L. Progress in the chemistry of naturally occurring coumarins. In: Kinghorn AD, Falk H, Gibbons S, Kobayashi JI, editors. Progress in the chemistry of organic natural products 106. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 241–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel A. Nguyen
    • 1
  • Muneeza K. Muhammad
    • 2
  • Grace L. Lee
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Medical City WeatherfordWeatherfordUSA
  2. 2.Baylor College of Medicine Department of DermatologyHoustonUSA
  3. 3.Texas Children’s Hospital Pediatric DermatologyHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations