Skip to main content

Cradle to Cradle Building Components Via the Cloud: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings
  • 2115 Accesses

Abstract

This paper expands upon ‘cradle to cradle carpets and cities’ presented by Ness and Field (Cradle to cradle carpets and cities. In Proceedings of SASBE 03, Brisbane, 2003) at SASBE 03, where the notion of providing modular carpets as a service was introduced, and a paper at SASBE 06, where the theme of providing C2C products as a service was further developed by Ness and Pullen (Decoupling resource consumption from growth: new business model towards a sustainable built environment in China. In: Proceedings of SASBE 06, Shanghai, 2006). It reports on the outcomes of an ARUP Global Research Challenge Project 2017, undertaken by University of South Australia, ARUP, Prismatic Architectural Research and other partners, under the theme of adapting the circular economy to the built environment. The project addresses the challenge of reusing building components, so they deliver more value over their extended life-cycle, with consequent reductions in resource consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, pollution and waste, coupled with creation of new enterprises and jobs. A universally accessible ‘Cloud-based building information management platform’ is being developed, which enables components to be identified, reclaimed reused and exchanged multiple times over their lifecycle, within the same or different facilities. A cyber-physical information exchange system was established between physical building components and their virtual counterparts, known as Building Information Models, so that their life cycle information including history of ownership, condition, maintenance history, technical specifications and physical performance could be tracked, monitored and managed. In addition, designers could identify reused components via the cloud platform, and assess their suitability for incorporation in building projects when compared with new products. This research was complemented by an innovative business model, whereby components and products can be provided as a service, with producers retaining responsibility for their repair, remanufacturing and/or reuse over their life cycle. The methodology involved establishing a Cyber-Physical System by connecting a series of existing technologies, including Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) and Building Information Modelling (BIM). Using a case study of a section of a major new hospital for ‘proof of concept’, information on the history, location, properties and performance of physical components could be exchanged in real-time from RFID tags to a local BIM system and thence to the cloud platform. Complemented by interviews within Australia and Europe with key stakeholders including designers, project managers, manufacturers, owners, investors and facility managers, the research led to the development of a ‘products as service’ business model and associated business case for the new paradigm. In short, a self-populating relational database that can execute predefined multiple/ conditional ownership exchange via a graphical user interface and/or web site front end. The findings are expected to drive increased reuse, adaptation and life-cycle stewardship within the building industry, whereby more value can be derived from built resources, new business opportunities created in the service sector, and adverse environmental impacts reduced. This is consistent with the pursuit of a ‘circular economy’, where the construction and management of the built environment can exert a major influence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ARUP (2016) Circular economy in the built environment. ARUP, London. September

    Google Scholar 

  • ARUP, BAM and CE100 (2017) Circular business models for the built environment, ARUP and Royal BAM Group

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker-Brown D (2017) The re-use atlas. RIBA Enterprises Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand S (1995) How buildings learn: what happens after they’re built? Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Circle Economy (2018) The circular phone. Circle Economy, Netherlands, 8 Jan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte and Utrecht University (2017) Breaking the barriers to a circular economy

    Google Scholar 

  • EMF (2015) Delivering the circular economy: a toolkit for policymakers, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, June

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldermans RJ (2016) Design for change and circularity – accommodating circular material and product flows in construction. Energy Procedia 96:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon A (1972) Designing for survival: the president introduces his long life/loose fit/low energy study. R Inst Br Archit J 79(9):374–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Netherlands (2016) A circular economy in the Netherlands by 2050, Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment and Ministry of Economic Affairs, 14 Sept

    Google Scholar 

  • Habraken NJ (2003) Open building as a condition for industrial construction, Automation and Robotics in Construction

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Treasury (2013) Infrastructure carbon review. London, November

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2015) Building construction – organisation of information about construction works – part 2. Framework for classification, ISO 12006-2: 2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran S, Timberlake J (2004) Refabricating architecture: how manufacturing methodologies are poised to transform building construction. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim KP, Park KS (2018) Housing information modelling for BIM-embedded housing refurbishment. J Facil Manag 16(3):299–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein T (2017) Towards circular building construction. In: Positions on circularity in the built environment (BauHow5), Department of Architecture, Technical University of Munich, 13–15 March

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness D, Field M (2003) Cradle to cradle carpets and cities. In: Proceedings of SASBE 03, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness D, Pullen S (2006) Decoupling resource consumption from growth: new business model towards a sustainable built environment in China. In: Proceedings of SASBE 06, Shanghai

    Google Scholar 

  • Ness D, Xing K (2017) Toward a resource efficient built environment: a literature review and conceptual model. J Ind Ecol 21:572–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ness D, Swift J, Ranasinghe D, Xing K, Soebarto V (2015) Smart steel: new paradigms for the reuse of steel enabled by digital tracking and modelling. J Clean Prod 98:292–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift J, Ness D, Chileshe N, Xing K, Gelder J (2015) Enabling the reuse of building components: a dialogue between the virtual and physical worlds. In: Proceedings of unmaking waste 2015 conference, University of South Australia, 22–24 May, pp 252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Swift J, Ness D, Kim K, Gelder J, Jenkins A, Xing K (2017) Towards adaptable and reusable building elements: harnessing the versatility of the construction database through seamless RFID and BIM data transfer. In: UIA 2017 Seoul World Architects Conference, 3–10 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashiro T (2000) Construction sectors as ‘service providers’: alternative business model for sustainable construction. In: Open building Tokyo 2000: continuous customisation in housing. Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashiro T (2004) Regeneration of small/medium size building stock by flexible re-fitting system: case illustration of ‘conversion’ in Japan. In OECD/IEA Workshop on sustainable buildings: towards sustainable use of building stock, 15–16 January, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuidema R (2015) Open building as the basis for circular economy buildings. ETH Zurich, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The assistance of nRAH and Spotless Facility Management is greatly acknowledged, in particular Mr Chris Penn (Deputy Chair of buildingSMART Australasia).

Mr Marc Kovacic of Construction Glazing, Australia, kindly assisted with advice on providing framed glazed systems as a service, and is testing procurement scenarios.

The advice and assistance of Prof Walter R. Stahel, recognised as the founder of the CE concept, is much appreciated.The research was funded under the ARUP Global Research Challenge 2017.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Ness .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ness, D., Kim, K., Swift, J., Jenkins, A., Xing, K., Roach, N. (2020). Cradle to Cradle Building Components Via the Cloud: A Case Study. In: Roggema, R., Roggema, A. (eds) Smart and Sustainable Cities and Buildings. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37635-2_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics