Advertisement

Thickness Measurements with Eddy Current and Ultrasonic Techniques

  • G. Betta
  • L. Ferrigno
  • M. Laracca
  • A. Rasile
  • A. SardellittiEmail author
Conference paper
  • 52 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 629)

Abstract

In the industrial applications, innovative solutions for thickness measurements are investigated in this last years. In particular, technical solutions characterized by proper metrological performance and at the same time small size, low cost, and simple integrability are followed with the aim of operating within the modern industrial context. In these scenarios, the paper describes a two thickness measurement techniques directly derived from Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) are analyzed and compared. In particular, the first technique is based on the induction of eddy currents (EC) in conductive materials, while the second technique is based on ultrasonic (UT) propagation within materials. A deep experimental analysis is carried out to verify the metrological performance of the two proposed techniques, and the obtained results have shown that is allows reaching metrological performance suitable for the typical industrial applications.

Keywords

Eddy current Ultrasonic Thickness measurement Non destructive testing 

References

  1. 1.
    Directive 85/374/EEC, amended by Directive 99/34/EC, “EU Directive on the responsibility for defective products,” 1999Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernieri A, Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2013) Improving performance of GMR sensors. IEEE Sens J 13(11):4513–4521ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M, Tamburrino A (2007) Improving GMR magnetometer sensor uncertainty by implementing an automatic procedure for calibration and adjustment. In 2007 IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conferenceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2002) Calibration and adjustment of an eddy current based multi-sensor probe for non-destructive testing. In: 2002 proceedings of the ISA/IEEE sensors for industry conference, Sicon/02, pp 120–124Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bernieri A, Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca, M (2012) Multi-frequency eddy current testing using a GMR based instrument. Int J Appl Electromagnet Mech 39:355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M, Rasile A, Ricci M (2018) Ultrasonic NDT on aluminum bars: An experimental performance comparison of excitation and processing techniques. Meas: J Int Meas Confederation 128:393–402.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.10.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ferrigno L, Laracca M, Liguori C, Pietrosanto A (2012) An FPGA-based instrument for the estimation of R, L, and C parameters under nonsinusoidal conditions. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61(5):1503–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sorrentino L, Bellini C, Capriglione D, Ferrigno L (2015) Local monitoring of polymerization trend by an interdigital dielectric sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79:1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Betta G, Capriglione D, Ferrigno L, Miele G (2008) Experimental investigation of the electromagnetic interference of ZigBee transmitters on measurement instruments. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(10):2118–2127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amicone D, Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2009) A smart add-on device for the remote calibration of electrical energy meters. In: Proceedings of IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, I2MTC 2009, pp 1599–1604Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ferrigno L, Paciello V, Pietrosanto A (2011) Visual sensors for remote metering in public networks. In: 2011, proceedings of IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, pp 1006–1011Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bernieri A, Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2012) Electrical energy metering in compliance with recent european standards. In: 2012, proceedings of international instrumentation and measurement technology conference, pp 1541–1545Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dodd CV, Deeds WE (1968) Analytical solutions to eddy-current probe-coil problems. J Appl Phys 39:2829Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lu M, Yin L, Peyton AJ, Yin W (2016) A novel compensation algorithm for thickness measurement immune to lift-off variations using eddy current method. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 65(12)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang H, Li W, Feng Z (2015) Noncontact thickness measurement of metal films using eddy-current sensors immune to distance variations. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 64(9):8Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pallav P, Gan TH, Hutchins DA (2007) Elliptical-Tukey chirp signal for high-resolution, aircoupled ultrasonic imaging. IEEE Trans Ultr, Ferr Freq Contr 54(8):1530–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ricci M, Senni L, Burrascano P (2012) Exploiting pseudorandom sequences to enhance noise immunity for air-coupled ultrasonic nondestructive testing. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 61(11):2905–2915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ykhlef F, Arezki M, Guessoum A, Berkani D (2004) A wavelet denoising method to improve detection with ultrasonic signal. In: Proocedings of 2004 IEEE international conference on industrial technology, pp 1–352 6Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Betta
    • 1
  • L. Ferrigno
    • 1
  • M. Laracca
    • 1
  • A. Rasile
    • 1
  • A. Sardellitti
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Information EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly

Personalised recommendations