Advertisement

Conducted Disturbance Robustness Evaluation of a Magnetic Short-Range Localization System

  • G. Betta
  • D. Capriglione
  • G. Cerro
  • L. Ferrigno
  • F. MilanoEmail author
Conference paper
  • 61 Downloads
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 629)

Abstract

In this article, a metrological characterization of the performance of a wireless localization system is carried out, considering the typical disturbances affecting the medical environment. Such system will be used in specific biomedical applications, including a glove for accurate tracking of unconstrained movements. To this purpose, the authors participate to a national project “Six DOF scalable finger tracking system”, whose goal is to develop a short-range wireless localization system with six degrees of freedom. The realized system will guarantee the real-time tracking of the fingers of the hand to provide support for the rehabilitation of patients with reduced motor skills. Obtained results, which exhibit a worsening in localization error due to disturbance effects, paths the way to a more robust transmission method able to reject or minimize single ton disturbance effect.

Keywords

Wireless localization system Magnetic measurement Electromagnetic compatibility 

References

  1. 1.
    Clifton DA, Wong D, Clifton L, Wilson S, Way R, Pullinger R, TarassenkoL (2013) A large-scale clinical validation of an integrated monitoring system in the emergency department. IEEE J Biomed Health Inf 17(4):835–842.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jbhi.2012.2234130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ferrer-Roca O et al (2006) Tele-virtual sonography. J Perinat Med 34(2):123–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choi T et al (2009) Wireless magnetic tracking system for radiation therapy. In: 2009 IEEE/NIH life science systems and applications workshop, pp 148–151.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LISSA.2009.4906731
  4. 4.
    Moschitta A, De Angelis A, Dionigi M, Carbone P (2017) Analysis of simultaneous 3d positioning and attitude estimation of a planar coil using inductive coupling. In: 2017 IEEE international instrumentation and measurement technology conference (I2MTC), pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/i2mtc.2017.7969848
  5. 5.
    Bernieri A, Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2013) Improving performance of gmr sensors. IEEE Sens J 13(11):4513–4521.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2013.2271275ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernieri A, Betta G, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2012) Multi-frequency eddy current testing using a gmr based instrument. Int J Appl Electromagn Mech 39(1–4):355–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sorrentino L, Bellini C, Capriglione D, Ferrigno L (2015) Local monitoring of polymerization trend by an interdigital dielectric sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 79(5–8):1007–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Amicone D, Bernieri A, Ferrigno L, Laracca M (2009) A smart add-on device for the remote calibration of electrical energy meters. In: 2009 IEEE instrumentation and measurement technology conference, pp 1599–1604.  https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.2009.5168710
  9. 9.
    Angrisani L, Capriglione D, Cerro G, Ferrigno L, Miele G (2016) Optimization and experimental characterization of novel measurement methods for wide-band spectrum sensing in cognitive radio applications. Measurement 94:585–601.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2016.08.036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Capriglione D, Cerro G, Ferrigno L, Miele G (2016) Analysis and implementation of a wavelet based spectrum sensing method for low snr scenarios. In: 2016 IEEE 17th international symposium on a world of wireless, mobile and multimedia networks (WoWMoM), pp. 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1109/WoWMoM.2016.7523585
  11. 11.
    Betta G, Capriglione D, Cerro G, Ferrigno L, Miele G (2015) The effectiveness of savitzky-golay smoothing method for spectrum sensing in cognitive radios. In: 2015 XVIII AISEM annual conference, pp 1–4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/AISEM.2015.7066819
  12. 12.
    Betta G, Capriglione D, Ferrigno L, Miele G (2008) Experimental investigation of the electromagnetic interference of zigbee transmitters on measurement instruments. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 57(10):2118–2127.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2008.922105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Capriglione D, Chiariello A, Maffucci A, Accurate models for evaluating the direct conducted and radiated emissions from integrated circuits. Appl Sci 8(4).  https://doi.org/10.3390/app8040477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Betta G, Capriglione D, Carobbi CF, Migliore MD (2011) The accurate calibration of emc antennas in compact chambers–measurements and uncertainty evaluations. Comput Stand Interfaces 33(2):201–205.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2010.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Betta
    • 1
  • D. Capriglione
    • 2
  • G. Cerro
    • 1
  • L. Ferrigno
    • 1
  • F. Milano
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Information EngineeringUniversity of Cassino and Southern LazioCassinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversity of SalernoFiscianoItaly

Personalised recommendations