Advertisement

Is Green Manure (Azolla pinnata and Sesbania rostrata) a Climate-Resilient Strategy for Rice Farming?

  • M. Khais PrayogaEmail author
  • Neni Rostini
  • Tualar Simarmata
  • Mieke Rochimi Setiawati
  • Silke Stoeber
  • Kustiwa Adinata
Chapter
  • 48 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Rice farming is one of the largest sources of greenhouse gas emissions in Indonesia. The climate-resilient agriculture investigation and innovation project (CRAIIP), Universitas Padjadjaran and the members of the Indonesian Farmers Community Network (JAMTANI) promoted solutions for climate-resilient rice farming through experiments in so-called climate field labs (CFL). This study contributes to the climate-resilience research by testing the nutrient uptake efficiency of three rice varieties using green manure. The farmers were involved in designing the research, selecting the rice varieties, collecting and analyzing the obtained data from climate farmer field schools. The CFL was set up as a factorial randomized block design. The first factor was green manure (10 tons/ha of cattle compost, 10 tons/ha of Azolla pinnata or 2 tons/ha of Sesbania rostrata combined with 10 tons of cattle compost) and the second factor was rice variety (the local Bangir, the widely cultivated Ciherang and the saline-tolerant Inpari 34). The CFL results revealed that the local variety Bangir with Sesbania enriched cattle manure tends to be the most efficient strategy for uptaking the nutrients. Climate-resilient policies to improve the resilience of smallholder farmers with minimal trade-offs for the environment  should include the propagation of suitable varieties and promising green manure application.

Keywords

Rice Climate change Green manure Climate field lab Climate resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the Climate-resilient Investigation and Innovation Project (CRAIIP) funded by the German Non-Governmental Organization Bread for the World (first phase: 2017–2018), which is implemented by JAMTANI. The authors are equally grateful to the farmers from the Taruna Tani Mekar Bayu Farmer Group, Ciganjeng village, Padaherang subdistrict, Pangandaran district, for their active participation in the design, implementation, and discussion of results and for the close collaboration throughout the experimental period.

References

  1. Assanga SO, Fuentealba M, Zhang G, Tan CT, Dhakal S, Rudd JC, Ibrahim AMH, Xue Q, Haley S, Chen J, Chao S, Baker J, Jessup K, Liu S (2017) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and its components in a US popular winter wheat TAM 111 using 90K SNPs. PLoS ONE 12(12):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BPS (2017) Statistics on Indonesian agricultural production. Central Bureau of Statistics. Jakarta. IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown CE (1998) Coefficient of variation. In: Applied Multivariate Statistics in Geohydrology and Related Sciences CE, Brown (eds) Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp 155–157Google Scholar
  4. Carlson K, Gerber MJS, Mueller ND, Herrero M, MacDonald GK, Brauman KA, Havlik P, O’Connell CS, Johnson JA, Saatchi S, West PC (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat Clim Chang 7:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ehsan S, Niaz A, Saleem I, Mehmood K (2014) Substitution of major nutrient requirement of rice-wheat cropping system through Sesbania green manuring. Sci Agric 8:99–102Google Scholar
  6. Espe MB, Kirk E, van Kessel C, Horwath WH, Linquist BA (2015) Indigenous nitrogen supply of rice is predicted by soil organic carbon. Soil Sci Soc Am J 79:569–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Falsafi P, Kerdari M, Kashani SJ (2015) Acceleration of transfer of findings as a new strategy the iranian national innovation system lessons from agricultural extension in Iran. J Agric Sustain 7(2):150–170Google Scholar
  8. Fehr W (1987) Principles of cultivar development, vol I, theory and technique. Macmillan Publishing Co., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Filho WL, Manke F (2014) Managing the impacts of climate change in Latin America: the need for technology transfer. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  10. Ilagan LA, Tablizo RP, Roberto BB Jr, Marquez NAA (2014) Soil fertility evaluation for rice production in Catanduanes Province, Philippines. Int J Sci Technol Res 3:81–87Google Scholar
  11. IPCC (2013) Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. IPCC (2015) Revised 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: reference manual. In: Eggleton HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) Prepared by The national greenhouse gas inventories programme. IGES JapanGoogle Scholar
  13. Latt YK, Myint AK, Yamakawa T, Ogata K (2009) The effects of green manure (Sesbania rostrata) on the growth and yield of rice. J Fac Agr Kyushu Univ 54(2):313–319Google Scholar
  14. Lee C, Park J, Kim B, Seo J, Lee G, Jang S, Koh H (2015) Influence of multi-gene allele combinations on grain size of rice and development of a regression equation model to predict grain parameters. Rice 33(8):1–10Google Scholar
  15. Linquist B, van Groenigen KJ, Adviento Borbe MA, Pittelkow C, van Kessel C (2012) An agronomic assessment of greenhouse gas emissions from major cereal crops. Glob Chang Biol 18:194–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu SL, Huang DY, Chen AL, Wei WX, Brookes PC, Li Y, Wu JS (2014) Differential responses of crop yields and soil organic carbon stock to fertilization and rice straw incorporation in three cropping systems in the subtropics. Agr Ecosyst Environ 184:51–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Minamikawa K, Fumoto T, Itoh M, Hayano M, Sudo S, Yagi K (2014) Potential of prolonged midseason drainage for reducing methane emission from rice paddies in Japan: a long-term simulation using the DNDC-rice model. Biol Fertil Soils 50:879–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ogbodo EN (2013) Impact of the use of inorganic fertilizers to the soils of the ebonyi state agro-ecology, South-Eastern Nigeria. J Environ Earth Sci 3(7):33–38Google Scholar
  19. Poehlman S (1995) Breeding field crops, 4th edn. Iowa State University PressGoogle Scholar
  20. Prashar P, Shah S (2016) Impact of fertilizers and pesticides on soil microflora in agriculture. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prayoga MK, Rachmady M, Wicaksana N (2016) Yield characters of 15 black soybean genotypes (Glycine soja (L.) Merr) in intercropping pattern of 2:1 with Corn. J Agrikultura 27(2):89–93Google Scholar
  22. Putri FM, Suedy SWA, Darmanti S (2017) The effect nanosilica fertilizer on numbers of stomata, chlorophyll content, and growth of black rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Japonica). Bull Anat Physiol 2:72–79Google Scholar
  23. Rathnayake WMUK, De Silva RP, Dayawansa NDK (2016) Assessment of the suitability of temperature and relative humidity for rice cultivation in rainfed lowland paddy fields in Kurunegala district. Tropic Agric Res 27(4):370–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rauf M, Usman AM, Djamaluddin S Saenong, Subandi (1989) Effect of seed quantity and method of planting on the N, P, and K content of Sesbania rostrata plants. Agrikam 4(1):33–41Google Scholar
  25. Razie F, Anas I, Sutandi A, Sutandi, Gunarto L (2013) Efficiency of nutrient uptake and rice yield with SRI cultivation on tidal land with enriched compost application. J Agron Indonesia 41(2):89–97Google Scholar
  26. Sange MO, Ryan AA, Letchford KA, Macgowan SA, Mielke T (2014) Chlorophylls, symmetry, chirality, and photosynthesis. Symmetry 6:781–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Setiawati MR, Damayani M, Herdiantoro D, Suryatmana P, Anggraini D, Khumairah FH (2017) The application dosage of Azolla pinnata in fresh and powder form as organic fertilizer on soil chemical properties, growth, and yield of rice plant. In: AIP conference proceedingsGoogle Scholar
  28. Simarmata T, Joya B, Turmuktini T (2011) Water saving and organic fertilizers based technology to remediate the health of paddy soils and to increase rice productivity in Indonesia. In: Proceeding of conference on international research on food security. Natural Resource Management and Rural Development, http://www.tropentag.de/2011/abstracts/full/694.pdf
  29. Simarmata T, Citraresmini A, Sujana B, Setiawati MR (2015) Organic based rice intensification innovation technology (IPAT-BO) for increasing the soil health and rice productivity toward the food sovereignty in Indonesia. In: Conference proceedings. Bappenas international conference on best development practices and policiesGoogle Scholar
  30. Soil Research Center (2009) Sesbania rostrata and Azolla pinnata can partially substitute nitrogen fertilizers. News Agric Res Dev 31(3):11–12Google Scholar
  31. Wabi MA, Verzelen K, Houngnandan P, Vanhove W, Lucas GKR, Van Damme P (2016) Sesbania rostrata (Bremek and Oberm.) as biological nitrogen fixator for sustainable lowland rice production. Tropentag. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, BOKU Vienna, Austria, pp 18–21Google Scholar
  32. Wahyuni TH, Kusnadi H, Honorita B (2017) The nutrient status of organic carbon and nitrogen of paddy fields in three districts in Bengkulu province. In: Proceedings of the suboptimal land national seminarGoogle Scholar
  33. Xiao Y, Ma W, Lu N, Wang Z, Wang N, Zhai W, Kong L, Qu G, Wang Q, Wang J (2019) Genetic variation of growth traits and genotype-by-environment interactions in clones of Catalpa bungei and Catalpa fargesii f. duclouxii. Forests 10:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Khais Prayoga
    • 1
    Email author
  • Neni Rostini
    • 1
  • Tualar Simarmata
    • 1
  • Mieke Rochimi Setiawati
    • 1
  • Silke Stoeber
    • 2
  • Kustiwa Adinata
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureUniversitas PadjadjaranBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.Centre for Rural Development (SLE)Humboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Indonesian Farmers Community Network (JAMTANI)PangandaranIndonesia

Personalised recommendations