Advertisement

Assessing Contribution of Climate Change on Wetlands by Using Multi-temporal Satellite Data

  • Nebiye MusaogluEmail author
  • Adalet Dervisoglu
  • Nur Yagmur
  • Baha Bilgilioglu
  • Aylin Tuzcu
  • Aysegul Tanik
Chapter
  • 33 Downloads
Part of the Climate Change Management book series (CCM)

Abstract

Numerous natural lentic systems of the world are under the threat of drying due to either natural or anthropogenic activities. Natural circumstances are basically due to climate change effects remarkably sensed within the past decades. However, human-induced activities in some cases dominate over natural events due to demand of water particularly for irrigation and domestic needs. This study investigates the changes that have occurred on the water surfaces of 3 significant water bodies located in the Konya Closed Basin of Turkey. Geographically inner Anatolia region of Turkey receives half of the annual average precipitation of the overall country; on the contrary, the region is known to be an important agricultural area. The majority of fertile arable land is spared to wet agriculture necessitating vast amounts of water. As expected, all the 3 water bodies have incredibly lost their water within years. In the multi-temporal analysis of the study area, Landsat 5 TM, 7 ETM+ and 8 OLI satellite images belonging to every 10-years interval between 1987 and 2017, and corresponding meteorological data were used. Water losses in the 3 ecosystems, one is a salt production lake, Tuz (Salt) Lake, the other is a Ramsar Site (Meke Maar), and the last one is an internationally recognized wetland (Akgol), are detected. Resultantly, it is observed that only Tuz Lake has been artificially fed in the last decade as its economic value is higher than the other two systems. Meke Maar and Akgol Wetland have high ecological value; however, their original functions vanished as they have almost lost their water. It is important to state that humans’ need of water is essential; but, unconscious utilization and wrong irrigation applications lead to water scarcity. On the other hand, climate change accelerates the reduction of water resources. Satellite data coupled with ground truth measurements are accepted as modern technological tools to detect short and long term temporal changes in the water surfaces of such vulnerable water systems especially for attracting the attention of decision-makers responsible of sustainable management of water resources.

Keywords

Wetlands Remote sensing Turkey Tuz lake Meke Akgol 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their thanks to TUBITAK for their financial support to Project number 116Y142, and to Istanbul Technical University, Scientific Research Project Funding for their financial support to ITU BAP Project number MGA-2017-40803.

References

  1. Bai J, Chen X, Li J, Yang L, Fang H (2011) Changes in the area of inland lakes in arid regions of central Asia during the past 30 years. Environ Monit Assess 178(1–4):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chang B, Li R, Zhu C, Liu K (2015) Quantitative impacts of climate change and human activities on water-surface area variations from the 1990s to 2013 in Honghu Lake. China. Water 7(6):2881–2899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dervisoglu A, Musaoglu N, Tanik A, Seker DZ, Kaya S (2017) Satellite-based temporal assessment of a dried lake: case study of Akgol Wetland. Fresenius Environ Bull 26(1):352–359Google Scholar
  4. Ekercin S, Ormeci C (2010) Evaluating climate change effects on water and salt resources in Salt Lake, Turkey using multitemporal SPOT imagery. Environ Monit Assess 163(1–4):361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gao BC (1996) NDWI—a normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens Environ 58(3):257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gao H, Wang L, Jing L, Xu J (2016) An effective modified water extraction method for Landsat-8 OLI imagery of mountainous plateau regions. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 34, Article 012010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ilcev SD (2019) Satellite remote sensing in meteorology. In global satellite meteorological observation (GSMO) applications, pp 129–182. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ji W, Xu X, Murambadoro D (2015) Understanding urban wetland dynamics: cross-scale detection and analysis of remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 36(7):1763–1788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Li L, Zha Y (2019) Satellite-based regional warming hiatus in China and its implication. Sci Total Environ 648:1394–1402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Li Z, Fan K, Tian L, Shi B, Zhang S, Zhang J (2015) Response of glacier and lake dynamics in four inland basins to climate change at the transition zone between the Karakorum and Himalayas. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0144696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martins VS, Novo EM, Lyapustin A, Aragão L, Freitas SR, Barbosa CC (2018) Seasonal and interannual assessment of cloud cover and atmospheric constituents across the Amazon (2000–2015): Insights for remote sensing and climate analysis. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 145 (Part B):309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McFeeters SK (1996) The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. Int J Remote Sens 17(7):1425–1432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McFeeters SK (2013) Using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) within a geographic information system to detect swimming pools for Mosquito abatement: a practical approach. Remote Sens 5(7):3544–3561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mitsch W, Gosselink J (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Nsubuga FWN, Botaib JO, Olwoch JM, de Rautenbach WCJ, Kalumba AM, Tselab P, Adeolab AM, Ssentongob AA, Mearns KF (2017) Detecting changes in surface water area of Lake Kyoga sub-basin using remotely sensed imagery in a changing climate. Theoret Appl Climatol 127(1–2):327–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ozcan O, Musaoglu N, Turkes M (2018) Assessing vulnerability of a forest ecosystem to climate change and variability in the western Mediterranean sub-region of Turkey. J For Res 29(3):709–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tiner RW, Lang MW, Klemas VV (2015) Remote sensing of wetlands applications and advances. CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Tuz Lake Management Plan (2014) Management plan of the Tuz Lake special protection area 2014–2018. Turkish Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, General Directorate on the Protection of Natural Assets AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang X, Zhou A, Sun Z (2016) Spatial and temporal dynamics of lakes in Nam Co Basin, 1991–2011. J Earth Sci 27(1):130–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yang J, Gong P, Fu R, Zhan M, Chen J, Liang S, Xu B, Shi J, Dickinson R (2013) The role of satellite remote sensing in climate change studies. Nat Clim Chang 3(10):875–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zou M, Niu J, Kang S, Li X, Lu H (2017) The contribution of human agricultural activities to increasing evapotranspiration is significantly greater than climate change effect over Heihe agricultural region. Sci Rep 7(1) 8805:1–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nebiye Musaoglu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adalet Dervisoglu
    • 1
  • Nur Yagmur
    • 1
  • Baha Bilgilioglu
    • 2
  • Aylin Tuzcu
    • 1
  • Aysegul Tanik
    • 3
  1. 1.Civil Engineering Faculty, Geomatic Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Geomatic Engineering DepartmentGumushane UniversityGumushaneTurkey
  3. 3.Civil Engineering Faculty, Environmental Engineering DepartmentIstanbul Technical UniversityMaslak, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations