Advertisement

Promoting Growth Mindset to Foster Cognitive Engagement

  • Angie J. Pohl
  • Julie Ann G. Nelson
Chapter
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

During development, children form beliefs or mindsets about their intelligence and ability. Those who believe that ability or intelligence is something a person is born with and that it cannot be changed have an entity theory of intelligence or fixed mindset. Those who believe intelligence and ability are malleable and can change over time are said to have an incremental theory of intelligence or growth mindset. These mindsets impact how children perceive learning, how they face challenges, and how they deal with success and failure. Children with a growth mindset believe that they can change their intelligence or ability through hard work, practice, effort, and using the right strategies. In this chapter, we will focus on students’ beliefs about their intelligence, ability, and effort and how to intervene to promote a growth mindset in order to increase student engagement, particularly cognitive engagement.

Keywords

Cognitive engagement Mindsets Growth mindsets Cognitive engagement intervention Self-efficacy Mastery-learning orientation 

References

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aronson, J., Cohen, G., McColskey, W., & Montrosse, B. (2009). Reducing stereotype threat in classrooms: A review of social-psychological intervention studies on improving the achievement of Black students. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Aronson, J., Fried, C., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy enhancing and suppressing teaching behaviors predicting students’ engagement in schoolwork. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 27, 261–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K., & Dweck. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78, 246–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brooks, R., Brooks, S., Goldstein, S. (2012). The power of mindsets: Nurturing engagement, motivation, and resilience in students. In Christenson, S. L., Reschly Army L., & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 541–562). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Claro, S., Paunesku, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 8664–8668.Google Scholar
  8. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
  10. Elliot, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents’ standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greene, B. A., & Miller, R. B. (1996). Influences on achievement: Goals, perceived ability, and cognitive engagement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21, 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paunesku, D., Walton, G. M., Romero, C., Smith, E. N., Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Mindset interventions are a scalable treatment for academic underachievement. Psychological Science, 26(6), 784–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schmidt, J. A., Shumow, L., & Kackar-Cam, H. Z. (2015). Teacher effects in outcomes of a growth mindset intervention in seventh grade science classes. Middle Grades Research Journal, 10(2), 17–32.Google Scholar
  17. Siegle, D., Rubenstein, L. D., Pollard, E., & Romey, E. (2010). Exploring the relationship of college freshmen honors students’ effort and ability attribution, interest, and implicit theory of intelligence with perceived ability. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(2), 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zeng, G., Hou, H., & Peng, K. (2016). Effect of growth mindset on school engagement and psychological well-being of Chinese primary and middle school students: The mediating role of resilience. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1873.Google Scholar
  19. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angie J. Pohl
    • 1
  • Julie Ann G. Nelson
    • 2
  1. 1.Burnsville-Eagan-Savage School DistrictBurnsvilleUSA
  2. 2.Orono Public School DistrictLong LakeUSA

Personalised recommendations