• Jane SealeEmail author


The focus of this book is disability, Information and Communication Technologies and Higher Education. Specifically, the contributing authors of this book examine the role that ICT can play in reducing the disadvantage that students with disabilities experience within HE. The purpose of this chapter is to outline and justify the contents and themes of the book, as well as to provide a background against which the issues discussed can be understood. In order to achieve this, this chapter will: (1) define key terms; (2) review relevant international legislation; (3) outline the aims and objectives of the research underpinning this book and (4) provide an overview of the five key themes that will be addressed in the book: models, stakeholders, designs, transitions and new solutions.


ICT Disability Higher education Legislation Practice Research 


  1. Access Israel. (2016). Regulation of higher education institutions in Israel, 2016. Resource document. Access Israel.
  2. Advance HE. (n.d.). Equality legislation. Resource document. Advance HE.
  3. Aust, R. (2018). Disability in higher education: Explanations and legitimisations from teachers at Leipzig University. Social Inclusion, 6(4), 125–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Axelrod, J. (2018). Making materials accessible to students in higher education institutes: Institutional obligations, methods of compliance, and recommendations for future action. Learned Publishing, 31(1), 39–44. Scholar
  5. Christopherson, R. (2018). Government identifies body to enforce website accessibility – Now will they step up to the task? Resource document. AbilityNet.
  6. Collins, T., Davies, S., & Gaved, M. (2016). Enabling remote activity: widening participation in field study courses. In D. Kennepohl (Ed.), Teaching science online: Practical guidance for effective instruction and lab work (pp. 183–195). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Council of Canadians with Disabilities. (2011, February). UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Making domestic implementation real and meaningful. Resource document. Council of Canadians with Disabilities.
  8. Eliav, T., Benayoun, D., Sabato, I., & Berger, E. (2014). National insurance institute, review of main activities and trends 2013. Resource document. Israeli government.
  9. Essential Accessibility. (2018, March 16). An overview of Canada’s accessibility laws: A look at the old and the new. Accessed 27 Sep 2019.
  10. Fichten, C. S., Asuncion, J., Barile, M., Ferraro, V., & Wolforth, J. (2009). Accessibility of e-learning and computer and information technologies for students with visual impairments in postsecondary education. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 103, 543–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisseler, B. (2018). New Practices: What individual and institutional practices can support the transition to and from PCE and from PCE to employment? Discussion paper for Ed-ICT Leverhulme International Network Symposium Hagen, October, 2018. Resource document. Ed-ICT.
  12. Goldberg, M., Karimi, H., & Pearlman, J. L. (2016). Interactive, mobile, Agile and novel education (IMAGINE): A conceptual framework to support students with mobility challenges in higher education. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 11(1), 50–60.Google Scholar
  13. Government of Canada. (2018a, October 22). Canadian Human Rights Commission. Resource document. Government of Canada.
  14. Government of Canada. (2018b, December 11). Proposed Accessible Canada Act – Summary of the bill. Employment and Social Development Canada. Resource document. Government of Canada.
  15. Government of Canada. (2019, February 22). Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982. Resource document. Government of Canada.
  16. Grabinger, S. (2010). A framework for supporting postsecondary learners with psychiatric disabilities in online environments. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 8(2), 101–110.Google Scholar
  17. Harper, K. A., & DeWaters, J. (2008). A quest for website accessibility in higher education institutions. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 160–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hums, M. A., Schmidt, S. H., Novak, A., & Wolff, E. A. (2016). Universal design: Moving the Americans with Disabilities Act from access to inclusion. Journal of Legal Aspects of Sport, 26, 36–51. Scholar
  19. IMS Global Learning Consortium. (2004). IMS access for all meta-data overview. Resource document. IMS Global Learning Consortium.
  20. Kimball, E. W., Wells, R. S., Ostiguy, B. J., Manly, C. A., & Lauterbach, A. A. (2016). Students with disabilities in higher education: A review of the literature and an agenda for future research. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 91–156). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Laron, E. (2005). Report of the public commission to examine matters relating to persons with disabilities and to promote their integration into the community. Jerusalem. (Hebrew).Google Scholar
  22. Lindsay, S., Lamptey, D.-L., Cagliostro, E., Srikanthan, D., Mortaji, N., & Karon, L. (2018). A systematic review of post-secondary transition interventions for youth with disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation, 1–14. Scholar
  23. Madaus, J. W., Banerjee, M., & Merchant, D. (2011). Transition to postsecondary education. In J. M. Kauffman & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Handbook of special education (pp. 571–583). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. McGill – Office for Students with Disabilities. (2019). Access technology & computing resources. Resource document. McGill University.
  25. Mull, C. A., & Sitlington, P. L. (2003). The role of technology in the transition to postsecondary education of students with learning disabilities. A review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 37(1), 26–32. Scholar
  26. Office for Civil Rights. (n.d.). About OCR. Resource document. U.S. Department of Education.
  27. Ontarians with Disabilities Act. (2014, April 22). The Act (AODA). Resource document. Ontario Government.
  28. Perlow, E. (2007). Accessibility in the postsecondary classroom: Health education faculty perspectives (2006–2007). Paper presented at CSUN 2007, Los Angeles, 22nd March. Resource document. CSUN.
  29. Rowland, C. (2012, November 19). Review of recent legal issues in higher education and web accessibility. Accessed 27 Sep 2019.
  30. Rowland, C., Whiting, J., & Smith, J. (2015). What do you need to create and maintain web accessibility? In D. L. Edyburn (Ed.), Accessible instructional design technology (Vol. 2, pp. 13–45). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rumrill, P. D., Jr., Koch, L. C., Murphy, P. J., & Jannarone, A. (1999). Technology transfer concerns of college graduates with disabilities: Profiles in transition from higher education to competitive careers. Work, 13(1), 43–49.Google Scholar
  32. Rumrill, P. E., Hendricks, E., Jacobs, D. J., Leopold, K., Hendricks, D. J., Sampson, E., et al. (2016). Promoting cognitive support technology use and employment success among postsecondary students with traumatic brain injuries. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45(1), 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Seale, J. (2006). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Abingdon, UK: Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seale, J. (2017a). From the voice of a ‘socratic gadfly’: A call for more academic activism in the researching of disability in postsecondary education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 153–169. Scholar
  35. Seale, J. (2017b). What models, approaches or frameworks exist in the field of disability, ICT and post-secondary education: are they successful in transforming the support and delivery of ICT for disabled students or do we need new ones? Discussion paper for Ed-ICT Leverhulme International Network Symposium, Seattle, March 2017. Resource document. Ed-ICT.
  36. Seale, J. (2018). Making higher education more accessible to disabled students: Do we need new technologies or new technology practices. Discussion paper for Ed-ICT Leverhulme International Network Symposium Tel Aviv, March 2018. Resource document. Ed-ICT.
  37. Seale, J. K. (2014). E-learning and disability in higher education: Accessibility research and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, E. (2018, February 18). Members of new advisory board want Nova Scotia to rethink accessibility. Accessed 27 Sep 2019.
  39. The Paciello Group. (2018, April 26). EU directive on the accessibility of public sector websites and mobile applications. Accessed 27 Sep 2019.
  40. The United States Congress. (2004). The Assistive Technology Act. Resource document. US Congress.
  41. U. S. Department of Education. (2011). Electronic book reader Dear Colleague letter: Questions and answers about the law, the technology, and the population affected. Resource document. Office for Civil Rights.
  42. U.S. Department of Justice and the U. S. Department of Education. (2010, June 29). Joint “dear colleague”: Electronic book readers. Resource document. US Government.
  43. W3C. (2018). Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. Resource document. W3C.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Wellness, Education and Language StudiesThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations