Contexts of Engagement

  • Nelson ZagaloEmail author
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


We discuss the environments that bring together subjects and artefacts, defining what motivates human curiosity and motivation, and how these two cognitive processes operate together to put subjects in will mode. Even if the willingness comes from inside, it is produced through stimulus, through cognitive triggers found in environments surrounding subjects, which we define here as patterns, and that we get to connect with the profiles defined in the previous chapter.


  1. Alter, A. (2017). Irresistible: The rise of addictive technology and the business of keeping us hooked. New York, USA: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ashley, M. (2013). Working backward to solve problems. Retrieved July 27, 2019, from TEDed website:
  3. Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1962. Oxford: University Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, Pearson.Google Scholar
  6. Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Men, women and the extreme male brain. London: Penguin Press Science.Google Scholar
  7. Baudrillard, J. (1981). Simulacres et Simulation. Paris: Éditions Galilée.Google Scholar
  8. Berlyne, D. (1954). A theory of human curiosity. British Journal of Psychology. General Section, 45(3), 180–191. Scholar
  9. Bor, D. (2012). The ravenous brain: How the new science of consciousness explains our insatiable search for meaning. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the fiction film. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base: Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  12. Boyd, B. (2010). On the origin of stories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., Witte, H., Soenens, B., & Lens, W. (2010). Capturing autonomy, competence, and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the work-related basic need satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 981–1002. Scholar
  14. Calvey, T. (2017). The extended evolutionary synthesis and addiction: The price we pay for adaptability.
  15. Carvalho, A. A., Zagalo, N., & Araujo, I. (2015). From games played by secondary students to a gamification framework. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 737–744.Google Scholar
  16. Cloninger, C. R. (1987). A Systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality variants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44(6), 573. Scholar
  17. Corcoran, K., Crusius, J., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms. In D. Chadee (Ed.), Theories in social psychology (pp. 119–139). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  18. Coyle, D. (2009). The talent code: Greatness isn’t born. It’s grown. Here’s how. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  19. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  20. Damasio, A. (2018). The strange order of things: Life, feeling, and the making of cultures. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  21. Darabont, F. (1994). The Shawshank redemption. Culver City: Columbia Pictures.Google Scholar
  22. Davis, I., Keeling, D., Schreier, P., & Williams, A. (2007). The Mckinsey approach to problem solving (No. 66).Google Scholar
  23. De Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy: Nature’s lessons for a kinder society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  24. Deci, E., & Flaste, R. (1996). Why we do what we do: Understanding self-motivation. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  25. Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
  26. DeLillo, D. (1985). White noise. New York: Viking Adult.Google Scholar
  27. Dubol, M., Trichard, C., Leroy, C., Sandu, A.-L., Rahim, M., Granger, B., … Artiges, E. (2018). Dopamine transporter and reward anticipation in a dimensional perspective: A multimodal brain imaging study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 43(4), 820–827.
  28. Dumas, D., Schmidt, L. C., & Alexander, P. A. (2016). Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 50–66. Scholar
  29. Dunbar, R., Lycett, J., & Barrett, L. (2005). Evolutionary psychology: A beginner’s guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
  30. Dunning, D., & Hayes, A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 213–229. Scholar
  31. Eco, U. (1989). The open work. Boston: Harvard University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. Scholar
  33. Fiske, S. (1995). Social cognition. Advanced social psychology (pp. 149–194). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the mind-reading. Trens in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12), 493–501. Scholar
  35. García, T., Boom, J., Kroesbergen, E. H., Núñez, J. C., & Rodríguez, C. (2019). Planning, execution, and revision in mathematics problem solving: Does the order of the phases matter? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 83–93. Scholar
  36. Gottlieb, J., Oudeyer, P.-Y., Lopes, M., & Baranes, A. (2013). Information-seeking, curiosity, and attention: Computational and neural mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 585–593. Scholar
  37. Gottschall, J. (2012). The storytelling animal: How stories make us human. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  38. Gould, S. J. (1985). The Flamingo’s smile: Reflections in natural history. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Harari, Y. N. (2014). Sapiens: A brief history of humankind. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  40. Hart, J. (2007). A Writer’s coach: The complete guide to writing strategies that work. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  41. Herman, D. (2013). Storytelling and the sciences of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hume, D. (1888). A treatise of human nature. London, Oxford : Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hunt, J. (1965). Intrinsic motivation and its role in psychological development. In Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 189–282).Google Scholar
  44. Iyengar, S. (2010). The art of choosing. New York: Twelve.Google Scholar
  45. James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology (Vols. 1 & 2). New York: Holt.
  46. Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., et al. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973. Scholar
  47. Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 303–315. Scholar
  48. Leslie, I. (2014). Curious: The desire to know and why your future depends on it. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  49. Litman, J. A. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion. Scholar
  50. Litman, J. A. (2008). Interest and deprivation factors of epistemic curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences. Scholar
  51. Litman, J. A. (2010). Relationships between measures of I- and D-type curiosity, ambiguity tolerance, and need for closure: An initial test of the wanting-liking model of information-seeking. Personality and Individual Differences. Scholar
  52. Litman, J. A. (2012). Epistemic curiosity. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning (pp. 1162–1165).
  53. Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2005). Individual differences in attitudes towards gossip. Personality and Individual Differences. Scholar
  54. Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2007). Dimensionality of interpersonal curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences. Scholar
  55. Loewenstein. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 1(116), 75–98. Scholar
  56. Maggitti, P. G., Smith, K. G., & Katila, R. (2013). The complex search process of invention. Research Policy, 42(1), 90–100. Scholar
  57. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. Scholar
  58. Mayer, R. E. (1983). Thinking, problem solving, cognition. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  59. Mayer, R. E. (2013). Problem solving. In The Oxford handbook of cognitive psychology.
  60. McGeary, K. (2018, October). Wander, roam, replicate: A conversation about copy-cat culture in the travel space With @Insta_Repeat. Passion Passport. Retrieved from
  61. Mead, G. H. (1982). The individual and the social self: Unpublished essays by G. H. Mead (D. L. Miller, Ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  62. Mitas, O., & Bastiaansen, M. (2018). Novelty: A mechanism of tourists’ enjoyment. Annals of Tourism Research, 72, 98–108. Scholar
  63. Morrisson, J. (1970). The lords and the new creatures. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  64. Mulvey, L. (1975). Visual pleasure and narrative Cinema. Screen, 16(3), 6–18. Scholar
  65. Munari, B. (1977). Fantasia. Coimbra: Edições 70.Google Scholar
  66. Pink, D. (2008). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  67. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Powell, C., Nettelbeck, T., & Burns, N. R. (2016). Deconstructing intellectual curiosity. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 147–151. Scholar
  70. Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27(1), 169–192. Scholar
  71. Robinson, C. D., Gallus, J., Lee, M. G., & Rogers, T. (2019). The demotivating effect (and unintended message) of awards. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Scholar
  72. Rock, I. (1985). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  73. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. Scholar
  74. Sakaki, M., Yagi, A., & Murayama, K. (2018). Curiosity in old age: A possible key to achieving adaptive aging. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 88, 106–116. Scholar
  75. Skinner, B. (1953). Science and human behavior. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  76. Storr, W. (2019). The science of storytelling. Croydon: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  77. Tannert, C., Elvers, H.-D., & Jandrig, B. (2007). The ethics of uncertainty. In the light of possible dangers, research becomes a moral duty. EMBO Reports, 8(10), 892–896.
  78. Varela, F. J., Rosch, E., & Thompson, E. (1991). The embodied mind. Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vygotsky, L. (1930). Imaginação e Criatividade na Infância. Lisboa: Dinalivro.Google Scholar
  80. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. manuscripts [ca. 1930-1934]).Google Scholar
  81. White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333. Scholar
  82. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. Scholar
  83. Zabelina, D. L., O’Leary, D., Pornpattananangkul, N., Nusslock, R., & Beeman, M. (2015). Creativity and sensory gating indexed by the P50: Selective versus leaky sensory gating in divergent thinkers and creative achievers. Neuropsychologia, 69, 77–84. Scholar
  84. Zagalo, N. (2009). Emoções Interactivas, do Cinema para os Videojogos (interactive emotions, from film to videogames). Retrieved from
  85. Zagalo, N., & Branco, P. (2015). Creativity in the digital age.
  86. Zillmann, D. (1991). Empathy: Affect from bearing witness to the emotions of others. In J. B. D. Zillmann (Ed.), Responding to the screen: Reception and reaction processes (pp. 135–167). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  87. Zuckerman, M. (2001). Sensation seeking: Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 13905–13908).

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and ArtUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations