• Nelson ZagaloEmail author
Part of the Human–Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)


This chapter presents the reasoning, motivation, relevance of the research subject, in addition to the methodological approaches employed, along with the structure through which the book’s theoretical, empirical concerns will be addressed.


  1. Bangle, C. (2001). How BMW turns art into profit. Harvard Business Review, (January), 47–56.Google Scholar
  2. Bazzul, J. (2016). Ethics and science education: How subjectivity matters.
  3. Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies, 3(4), 221–227.Google Scholar
  4. Da Vinci, L. (1519). Thoughts on art and life (M. Baring, ed.). Boston: Merrymount Press.Google Scholar
  5. Da Vinci, L. (1540). A treatise on painting (Codex Rurbinas Latinus). Roma: Vatican.Google Scholar
  6. De Waal, F. (1982). Chimpanzee politics: power and sex among apes. London: Jonathan CapeGoogle Scholar
  7. Dowling, H. M. (1961). Science and culture: A false antithesis. New Scientist, (253), 727–729. Retrieved from
  8. Dunbar, R. (1998). The social brain hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews, 6(5), 178–190.;2-8.
  9. Dunbar, R. (2009). The social brain hypothesis and its implications for social evolution. Annals of Human Biology, 36(5), 562–572.
  10. Everett, D. L. (2017). How language Began: The story of Humanity’s Greatest Invention. New York: W. W. Norton Company.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory, J. (2015). Science communication. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 219–224).
  12. Grove, J. (2015). Social sciences and humanities faculties “to close” in Japan after ministerial intervention. Times Higher Education. Retrieved from
  13. Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  14. James, W. (1907). Pragmatism. A new name for some old ways of thinking. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, K. (1998). Essays on science and society. Science, 279(5353), 992–993.
  16. Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  17. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Naughton, J. (2017, November 19). How a half-educated tech elite delivered us into chaos. The Guardian. Retrieved from
  19. Pink, D. (2006). A whole new mind: why right-brainers will rule the future. New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar
  20. Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Plato. (380BC). Republic (B. Jowett, ed.). Public Domain.Google Scholar
  22. Ross, A. (1996). Science wars. Durham: Duke University Press Books.Google Scholar
  23. Shaw, G. B. (1904). John Bull’s other island. London: Royal Court Theatre.Google Scholar
  24. Snow, C. P. (1959). The two cultures and the scientific revolution. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Snow, C. P. (1963). The two cultures: And a second look. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Whitehead, A. N. (1917). Presidential address: Technical education and its relation to science and literature. The Mathematical Gazette, 9(128), 20.
  27. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The aims of education. In The aims of education & other essays (pp. 1–14). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and ArtUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations