Advertisement

Dynamic Functional Connectivity in the Musical Brain

  • Dipankar NiranjanEmail author
  • Petri Toiviainen
  • Elvira Brattico
  • Vinoo Alluri
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11976)

Abstract

Musical training causes structural and functional changes in the brain due to its sensory-motor demands. This leads to differences in how musicians perceive and process music as compared to non-musicians, thereby providing insights into brain adaptations and plasticity. Correlational studies and network analysis investigations have indicated the presence of large-scale brain networks involved in the processing of music and have highlighted differences between musicians and non-musicians. However, studies on functional connectivity in the brain during music listening tasks have thus far focused solely on static network analysis. Dynamic Functional Connectivity (DFC) studies have lately been found useful in unearthing meaningful, time-varying functional connectivity information in both resting-state and task-based experimental settings. In this study, we examine DFC in the fMRI obtained from two groups of participants, 18 musicians and 18 non-musicians, while they listened to a musical stimulus in a naturalistic setting. We utilize spatial Group Independent Component Analysis (ICA), sliding time window correlations, and a deterministic agglomerative clustering of windowed correlation matrices to identify quasi-stable Functional Connectivity (FC) states in the two groups. To compute cluster centroids that represent FC states, we devise and present a method that primarily utilizes windowed correlation matrices occurring repeatedly over time and across participants, while excluding matrices corresponding to spontaneous fluctuations. Preliminary analysis indicate states with greater visuo-sensorimotor integration in musicians, larger presence of DMN states in non-musicians, and variability in states found in musicians due to differences in training and prior experiences.

Keywords

Dynamic Functional Connectivity Clustering ICA State characterization Musicians vs. non-musicians 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (project numbers 272250 and 274037) and the Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF117).

References

  1. 1.
    Allen, E.A., Damaraju, E., Plis, S.M., Erhardt, E.B., Eichele, T., Calhoun, V.D.: Tracking whole-brain connectivity dynamics in the resting state. Cereb. Cortex 24(3), 663–676 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alluri, V., Toiviainen, P., Burunat, I., Kliuchko, M., Vuust, P., Brattico, E.: Connectivity patterns during music listening: evidence for action-based processing in musicians. Hum. Brain Mapp. 38(6), 2955–2970 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alluri, V., Toiviainen, P., Jääskeläinen, I.P., Glerean, E., Sams, M., Brattico, E.: Large-scale brain networks emerge from dynamic processing of musical timbre, key and rhythm. NeuroImage 59, 3677–3689 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Angulo-Perkins, A., Aubé, W., Peretz, I., Barrios, F.A., Concha, L.C.B.: Music listening engages specific cortical regions within the temporal lobes: differences between musicians and non-musicians. Cortex 59, 126–137 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.L., Lambiotte, R., Lefebvre, E.: Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. 2008(10), P10008 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braun, U., et al.: Dynamic reconfiguration of frontal brain networks during executive cognition in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 11678–11683 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burunat, I., Tsatsishvili, V., Brattico, E., Toiviainen, P.: Coupling of action-perception brain networks during musical pulse processing: evidence from region-of-interest-based independent component analysis. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 11, 230 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Calhoun, V.D., Adali, T., Pearlson, G.D., Pekar, J.J.: A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 14(3), 140–151 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Damaraju, E., et al.: Dynamic functional connectivity analysis reveals transient states of dysconnectivity in schizophrenia. NeuroImage: Clin. 5, 298–308 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fauvel, B., et al.: Morphological brain plasticity induced by musical expertise is accompanied by modulation of functional connectivity at rest. NeuroImage 90, 179–188 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gaser, C., Schlaug, G.: Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J. Neurosci. 23(27), 9240–9245 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Bandettini, P.A.: Task-based dynamic functional connectivity: recent findings and open questions. NeuroImage 180, 526–533 (2018). Brain Connectivity DynamicsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hutchinson, S., Lee, L.H.L., Gaab, N., Schlaug, G.: Cerebellar volume of musicians. Cereb. Cortex 13(9), 943–949 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Imfeld, A., Oechslin, M., Meyer, M., Loenneker, T., Jäncke, L.: White matter plasticity in the corticospinal tract of musicians: a diffusion tensor imaging study. NeuroImage 46, 600–607 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koelsch, S., et al.: The roles of superficial amygdala and auditory cortex in music-evoked fear and joy. NeuroImage 81, 49–60 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maneshi, M., Vahdat, S., Gotman, J., Grova, C.: Validation of shared and specific independent component analysis (SSICA) for between-group comparisons in fMRI. Front. Neurosci. 10, 417 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Novembre, G., Keller, P.E.: A conceptual review on action-perception coupling in the musicians’ brain: what is it good for? Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 603 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Preti, M.G., Bolton, T.A.W., Ville, D.V.D.: The dynamic functional connectome: state-of-the-art and perspectives. NeuroImage 160, 41–54 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubinov, M., Sporns, O.: Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. NeuroImage 52(3), 1059–1069 (2010). Computational Models of the BrainCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Toiviainen, P., Alluri, V., Brattico, E., Wallentin, M., Vuust, P.: Capturing the musical brain with lasso: dynamic decoding of musical features from fMRI data. NeuroImage 88, 170–180 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilkins, R.W., Hodges, D.A., Laurienti, P.J., Steen, M.L., Burdette, J.H.: Network science and the effects of music preference on functional brain connectivity: from Beethoven to Eminem. Sci. Rep. 4, 6130 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zimek, A., Schubert, E., Kriegel, H.P.: A survey on unsupervised outlier detection in high-dimensional numerical data. Stat. Anal. Data Min.: ASA Data Sci. J. 5(5), 363–387 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dipankar Niranjan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Petri Toiviainen
    • 2
  • Elvira Brattico
    • 3
  • Vinoo Alluri
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Science Lab, Kohli Center on Intelligent SystemsIIIT HyderabadHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Department of MusicUniversity of JyvaskylaJyväskyläFinland
  3. 3.Department of Clinical Medicine, Center for Music in the BrainAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark

Personalised recommendations