Identification of Stress Impact on Personality Density Distributions

  • Brendan Lys
  • Xiaohui TaoEmail author
  • Tony Machin
  • Ji Zhang
  • Ning Zhong
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11976)


The high cost of stress both at the individual and societal levels is well documented. This study seeks to explore a new approach to the detection of individuals suffering from high levels of stress, through the analysis of changes in personality density distributions in relation to stress. The proposed approach is to gain personality profile information from text - building density distributions from these profiles, and using this same text to carry out stress analysis. The density distributions are then further analysed to explore the potential to identify density distribution shape changes in relation to stress.


  1. 1.
    Fleeson, W., Jayawickreme, E.: Whole trait theory. J. Res. Pers. 56, 82–92 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fleeson, W.: Toward a structure-and process-integrated view of personality: traits as density distributions of states. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80(6), 1011 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fleeson, W., Noftle, E.: The end of the person-situation debate: an emerging synthesis in the answer to the consistency question. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2(4), 1667–1684 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vinciarelli, A., Mohammadi, G.: A survey of personality computing. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(3), 273–291 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wright, A.G.: Current directions in personality science and the potential for advances through computing. IEEE Trans. Affect. Comput. 5(3), 292–296 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farnadi, G., et al.: Computational personality recognition in social media. User Model. User-Adapt. Interact. 26(2), 109–142 (2016). Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kaushal, V., Patwardhan, M.: Emerging trends in personality identification using online social networks—a literature survey. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data (TKDD) 12(2), 15 (2018)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cumming, J.J., Goldstein, H.: Handling attrition and non-response in longitudinal data with an application to a study of Australian youth. Longitud. Life Course Stud. 7(1), 53–63 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schmidhuber, J., Hochreiter, S.: Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 9, 1735–1780 (1998) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Majumder, A.G.N., Poria, S., Cambria, E.: Deep learning-based document modeling for personality detection from text. IEEE Intell. Syst. 32, 74–79 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tandera, T., Hendro, Prasetio, Y.L.: Personality prediction system from Facebook users. Proc. Comput. Sci. 116, 604–611 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dewe, P.J., O’Driscoll, M.P., Cooper, C.: Coping with Work Stress: A Review and Critique. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holroyd, K.A., Lazarus, R.S.: Stress, coping and somatic adaptation. In: Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects, pp. 21–35 (1982)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGonigal, K.: The Upside of Stress: Why Stress Is Good for You, and How to Get Good at It. Penguin, New York (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brendan Lys
    • 1
  • Xiaohui Tao
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tony Machin
    • 2
  • Ji Zhang
    • 1
  • Ning Zhong
    • 3
  1. 1.School of SciencesUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.School of Psychology and CounsellingUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Life Science and InformaticsMaebashi Institute of TechnologyMaebashiJapan

Personalised recommendations