Selective End-To-End Data-Sharing in the Cloud
- 283 Downloads
Cloud-based services enable easy-to-use data-sharing between multiple parties, and, therefore, have been widely adopted over the last decade. Storage services by large cloud providers such as Dropbox or Google Drive as well as federated solutions such as Nextcloud have amassed millions of users. Nevertheless, privacy challenges hamper the adoption of such services for sensitive data: Firstly, rather than exposing their private data to a cloud service, users desire end-to-end confidentiality of the shared files without sacrificing usability, e.g., without repeatedly encrypting when sharing the same data set with multiple receivers. Secondly, only being able to expose complete (authenticated) files may force users to expose overmuch information. The receivers, as well as the requirements, might be unknown at issue-time, and thus the issued data set does not exactly match those requirements. This mismatch can be bridged by enabling cloud services to selectively disclose only relevant parts of a file without breaking the parts’ authenticity. While both challenges have been solved individually, it is not trivial to combine these solutions and maintain their security intentions.
In this paper, we tackle this issue and introduce selective end-to-end data-sharing by combining ideas from proxy re-encryption and redactable signature schemes. Proxy re-encryption provides us with the basis for end-to-end encrypted data-sharing, while redactable signatures enable to redact parts and selectively disclose only the remaining still authenticated parts. We overcome the issues encountered when naively combining these two concepts, introduce a security model, and present a modular instantiation together with implementations based on a selection of various building blocks. We conclude with an extensive performance evaluation of our instantiation.
KeywordsData-sharing End-to-end confidentiality Proxy re-encryption Redactable signatures
This work was supported by the H2020 EU project credential under grant agreement number 653454.
- 2.Ateniese, G., Fu, K., Green, M., Hohenberger, S.: Improved proxy re-encryption schemes with applications to secure distributed storage. In: NDSS. The Internet Society (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Barker, E.: SP 800–57. Recommendation for Key Management, Part 1: General (Rev 4). Technical report, National Institute of Standards & Technology (2016)Google Scholar
- 9.Camenisch, J., Herreweghen, E.V.: Design and implementation of the idemix anonymous credential system. In: ACM CCS, pp. 21–30. ACM (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Canetti, R., Hohenberger, S.: Chosen-ciphertext secure proxy re-encryption. In: ACM CCS, pp. 185–194. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Chandran, N., Chase, M., Liu, F.-H., Nishimaki, R., Xagawa, K.: Re-encryption, functional re-encryption, and multi-hop re-encryption: a framework for achieving obfuscation-based security and instantiations from lattices. In: Krawczyk, H. (ed.) PKC 2014. LNCS, vol. 8383, pp. 95–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54631-0_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Demirel, D., Derler, D., Hanser, C., Pöhls, H.C., Slamanig, D., Traverso, G.: PRISMACLOUD D4.4: overview of functional and malleable signature schemes. Technical repoet, H2020 PRISMACLOUD (2015)Google Scholar
- 19.Derler, D., Hanser, C., Slamanig, D.: Revisiting cryptographic accumulators, additional properties and relations to other primitives. IACR ePrint 2015, 87 (2015)Google Scholar
- 20.Derler, D., Krenn, S., Lorünser, T., Ramacher, S., Slamanig, D., Striecks, C.: Revisiting proxy re-encryption: forward secrecy, improved security, and applications. In: Abdalla, M., Dahab, R. (eds.) PKC 2018. LNCS, vol. 10769, pp. 219–250. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76578-5_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.European Commission: Regulation (EU) 2016/679 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the European Union L119/59, May 2016Google Scholar
- 25.Goyal, V., Pandey, O., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Attribute-based encryption for fine-grained access control of encrypted data. In: ACM CCS, pp. 89–98. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
- 26.Hörandner, F., Krenn, S., Migliavacca, A., Thiemer, F., Zwattendorfer, B.: CREDENTIAL: a framework for privacy-preserving cloud-based data sharing. In: ARES, pp. 742–749. IEEE Computer Society (2016)Google Scholar
- 31.Menezes, A., Sarkar, P., Singh, S.: Challenges with assessing the impact of NFS advances on the security of pairing-based cryptography. In: Phan, R.C.-W., Yung, M. (eds.) Mycrypt 2016. LNCS, vol. 10311, pp. 83–108. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61273-7_5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Paquin, C., Zaverucha, G.: U-prove cryptographic specification v1.1 (revision 3). Technical report, Microsoft, December 2013Google Scholar
- 34.Pirretti, M., Traynor, P., McDaniel, P.D., Waters, B.: Secure attribute-based systems. In: ACM CCS, pp. 99–112. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
- 36.Samelin, K., Pöhls, H.C., Bilzhause, A., Posegga, J., de Meer, H.: Redactable signatures for independent removal of structure and content. In: Ryan, M.D., Smyth, B., Wang, G. (eds.) ISPEC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7232, pp. 17–33. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29101-2_2CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 38.Weng, J., Deng, R.H., Ding, X., Chu, C., Lai, J.: Conditional proxy re-encryption secure against chosen-ciphertext attack. In: AsiaCCS, pp. 322–332. ACM (2009)Google Scholar