Governance and Stakeholder Management in the Urban Transportation Sector

  • Guido Noto
Part of the System Dynamics for Performance Management & Governance book series (SDPM, volume 3)


This chapter discusses a key topic of strategic planning that is often under-evaluated by urban transportation planning studies: dealing with the institutional framework, stakeholders, and the community. The chapter presents and explains a tailored approach to stakeholder analysis and engagement in urban transportation planning processes. In particular, it discusses how Dynamic Performance Management may offer an instrumental solution to identify the key stakeholders of an urban transportation system, to make a diagnosis of the urban context, and to support policy development and the implementation phase through the development of performance measures.


Stakeholder analysis Urban transportation System dynamics Stakeholder engagement Governance 


  1. Ackermann, F., & Eden, C. (2011). Strategic management of stakeholders: Theory and practice. Long Range Planning, 44(3), 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2001). Big questions in public network management research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11(3), 295–326.Google Scholar
  3. Agranoff, R., & McGuire, M. (2004). Collaborative public management: New strategies for local governments. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning re-examined. Environment and Planning B, 31(5), 743–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aligica, P. D. (2006). Institutional and stakeholder mapping: Frameworks for policy analysis and institutional change. Public Organization Review, 6(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews, R., & Beynon, M. J. (2017). Managerial networking and stakeholder support in public service organizations. Public Organization Review, 17(2), 237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109.Google Scholar
  9. Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Barlas, Y. (1996). Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. System Dynamics Review: The Journal of the System Dynamics Society, 12(3), 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an ‘external’ to an ‘internal’ perspective. System Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 361–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bianchi, C. (2012). Enhancing performance management and sustainable organizational growth through system-dynamics modelling. In S. N. Groesser & R. Zeier (Eds.), Systemic management for intelligent organizations (pp. 143–161). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bianchi, C. (2016). Dynamic performance management. Basel: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bianchi, C., & Tomaselli, S. (2015). A dynamic performance management approach to support local strategic planning. International Review of Public Administration, 20(4), 370–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O'Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bovaird, T. (2005). Public governance: Balancing stakeholder power in a network society. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(2), 217–228.Google Scholar
  17. Briony, O. (2003). The potential contribution of ICTs to the political process. The Electronic Journal of Government, 1(1), 31–39.Google Scholar
  18. Brugha, R., & Varvasovszky, Z. (2000). Stakeholder analysis: A review. Health Policy and Planning, 15(3), 239–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bryson, J. M. (2004). What to do when stakeholders matter: A guide to stakeholder identification and analysis techniques. Public Management Review, 6(1), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1996). Strategic planning options for the public sector. In J. L. Perryand & R. K. Christensen (Eds.), Handbook of public administration (pp. 479–483). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of Cross‐Sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public administration review, 66, 44–55.Google Scholar
  22. Burford, L. D. (2013). Project management for flat organizations. Cost effective steps to achieving successful results. Fort Lauderdale: J. Ross Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Cavenago, D. (2004). Città e piano strategico. Milan: II Sole 24 Ore.Google Scholar
  24. Cavenago, D., & Margheri, A. (2006). La pianificazione strategica nelle amministrazioni locali. In A. Margheri (Ed.), Elementi di management pubblico (pp. 31–54). Trento: Nicolodi Editore.Google Scholar
  25. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.Google Scholar
  26. Clarke, T., & Clegg, S. (1998). Changing paradigms: The transformation of management knowledge for the 21st century. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  27. Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Colvin, R. M., Witt, G. B., & Lacey, J. (2016). Approaches to identifying stakeholders in environmental management: Insights from practitioners to go beyond the ‘usual suspects’. Land Use Policy, 52, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2005). Leadership for the common good: Tackling public problems in a shared-power world. San Francisco: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Cunningham, C., & Tynan, C. (1993). Electronic trading, inter-organizational systems and the nature of buyer-seller relationships: The need for a network perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 13, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Duggan, D. E., Farnsworth, K. D., & Kraak, S. B. M. (2013). Identifying functional stakeholder clusters to maximise communication for the ecosystem approach to fisheries management. Marine Policy, 42, 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (1998). Strategy making: The journey of strategic management. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  34. Gao, S. S., & Zhang, J. J. (2006). Stakeholder engagement, social auditing and corporate sustainability. Business Process Management Journal, 12(6), 722–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossi, G., & Mussari, R. (2008). Effects of outsourcing on performance measurement and reporting: the experience of Italian local governments. Public Budgeting & Finance, 28(1), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Håkansson, H. (1987). Technological development: A network approach. New York: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  37. Halligan, J., Sarrico, C. S., & Rhodes, M. L. (2012). On the road to performance governance in the public domain? International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(3), 224–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Johnston, W., Hicks, D., Nan, N., & Auer, J. C. (2011). Managing the inclusion process in collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 699–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kettl, D. (2002). The transformation of governance: Public administration for twenty-first century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Kim, H., MacDonald, R. H., & Andersen, D. F. (2013). Simulation and managerial decision making: A double-loop learning framework. Public Administration Review, 73(2), 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mussari, R. (2005). Public sector financial management reform in Italy. In J. Guthrie, C. Humphrey, L. R. Jones, & O. Olson (Eds.), International public financial management reform: Progress, contradictions, and challenges (pp. 139–168). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Noto, G. (2012). Pianificazione strategica e governance pubblica: Il caso di Auckland. (Master’s dissertation, University of Trento, Trento).Google Scholar
  45. Noto, G., & Bianchi, C. (2015). Dealing with multi-level governance and wicked problems in urban transportation systems: The case of Palermo municipality. Systems, 3(3), 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Noto, G., & Noto, L. (2019). Local strategic planning and stakeholder analysis: Suggesting a dynamic performance management approach. Public Organization Review, 19(3), 293–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Olokesusi, F., & Aiyegbajeje, F. O. (2017). E-democracy for smart city Lagos. In T. M. V. Kumar (Ed.), E-democracy for Smart Cities (pp. 51–70). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2001). Developments in intergovernmental relations: Towards multi-level governance. Policy and Politics, 29(2), 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pfeffer, J. (1981). Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
  50. Pierre, J. (1998). Partnerships in urban governance: European and American experience. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Poister, T. H. (2010). The future of strategic planning in the public sector: Linking strategic management and performance. Public Administration Review, 70, s246–s254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pollit, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1(1), 34–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pouloudi, A. (1999). Aspects of the stakeholder concept and their implications for information systems development. In 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, January 5–8.Google Scholar
  54. Pouloudi, A., & Whitley, E. A. (1997). Stakeholder identification in interorganizational systems: Gaining insights for drug use management systems. European Journal of Information Systems, 6(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Provan, K. G., & Milward, B. H. (1995). A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Provan, K. G., & Milward, B. H. (2001). Do networks really work? A framework for evaluating public sector organizational networks. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 414–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933–1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155–169.Google Scholar
  59. Salado, A., & Nilchiani, R. (2013). Contextual- and behavioral-centric stakeholder identification. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 908–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sanò, M., & Medina, R. (2012). A systems approach to identify sets of indicators: Applications to coastal management. Ecological Indicators, 23, 588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor centered institutionalism in policy research. Oxford: West View Point.Google Scholar
  62. Simmons, J. (2003). Reconciling effectiveness and equity in performance management: A stakeholder synthesis approach to organisational systems design. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 16(5), 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Simmons, J., Iles, P., & Yolles, M. (2005). Identifying those on board ‘the moving train’: Towards a stakeholder focused methodology for organisational decision making. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22(1), 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smudde, P. M., & Courtright, J. L. (2011). A holistic approach to stakeholder management: A rhetorical foundation. Public Relations Review, 37(2), 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stave, K. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review, 18(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stave, K. A. (2003). A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. Journal of Environmental Management, 67(4), 303–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of management review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thomas, J. C. (1993). Public involvement and governmental effectiveness: A decision-making model for public managers. Administration and Society, 24(4), 444–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Thomas, J. C. (1995). Public participation in public decisions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  70. Thomas, J. C., & Poister, T. H. (2009). Thinking about stakeholders of public agencies: The Georgia Department of Transportation stakeholder audit. Public Organization Review, 9(1), 67–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tornberg, P., & Odhage, J. (2018). Making transport planning more collaborative? The case of Strategic Choice of Measures in Swedish transport planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 416–429.Google Scholar
  72. Trivellato, B., & Cavenago, D. (2014). From urban planning to smart collaborative strategies: Lessons from Italian cities. In P. Joyce & A. Drumaux (Eds.), Strategic management in public organizations: European practices and perspectives (pp. 57–75). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  73. Turrini, A., Cristofoli, D., Frosini, F., & Nasi, G. (2010). Networking literature about determinants of network effectiveness. Public Administration, 88(2), 528–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Vennix, J. A. M. (1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Wang, W., Liu, W., & Mingers, J. (2015). A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using soft systems methodology (SSM). European Journal of Operational Research, 246(2), 562–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weber, M. (1947). The theory of economic and social organization. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guido Noto
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MessinaMessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations