Colonoscopy Videos: Towards Automatic Assessing of the Bowels Cleansing Degree

  • M. LucaEmail author
  • A. Ciobanu
  • V. Drug
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 101)


In the attempt to decrease the number of colon cancers deaths, colonoscopy is one of the main screening tests recommended by the American and European guidelines, as well as the updated Asia Pacific consensus statements, meant to early detect abnormal structures formed on colon surface. In order to obtain the best images, a very effective colon cleansing is necessary. Thus, polyps, diverticulitis, or any peculiar aspects of the intestinal membrane, might be observed. Subjective evaluation influenced by various cleansing degrees might conduct to different results, or even to omissions. Expert assessment variability is another factor influencing the diagnosis. We further describe special software, useful for an objective, semi-supervised, evaluation of bowel cleansing degree.


Video colonoscopy Image processing Narrow band imaging La*b* RGB color spaces 



All the video colonoscopy images were obtained with the written consent of the patients and were completely anonymised for the image processing.

No personal data is detained whatever upon the image content.


  1. 1.
    American Cancer Society, Key statistics for colorectal cancer. Accessed June 2019
  2. 2.
    Lai, E.J., Calderwood, A.H., Doros, G., et al.: The Boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy-oriented research. Gastrointest. Endosc. Clin. N. Am. 69, 620–625 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gerard, D.P., Foster, D.B., Raiser, M.W., Holden, J.L., Karrison, T.G.: Validation of a new bowel preparation scale for measuring colon cleansing for colonoscopy: The Chicago bowel preparation scale. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 4(12): e43n (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muthukudage, J.K., Oh, J.H., Tavanapong, W., Wong, J., de Groen, P.C.: Color based stool region detection in colonoscopy videos for quality measurements. In: Ho, Y.-S. (ed.) PSIVT 2011, Part I, LNCS 7087, pp. 61–72. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hwang, S., Oh, J., Tavanapong, W., Wong, J., de Groen, P.C.: Stool detection in colonoscopy videos. In: Proceedings of International Conference of the IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 3004–3007 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ciobanu, A., Luca, M., Drug, V., Tulceanu, V.: Steps towards computer-assisted classification of colonoscopy video frames. In: 6th IEEE International Conference on E-health and Bioengineering—EHB Sinaia, Romania (2017)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Luca, M., Ciobanu, A., Drug, V.: LAB automatic evaluation of colon cleansing. In: ESGE Days 2019, ePP50, Abstract Volume, p. 145 (2019)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciobanu, A., Costin, M., Barbu, T.: Image categorization based on computationally economic lab colour features. In: Balas, V., Fodor, J., Varkonyi-Koczy, A., Dombi, J., Jain, L. (eds.), Soft Computing Applications. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 195, pp. 585–593. Springer, Berlin (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    World Health Organization, Fact Sheets: Cancer, Key Facts. Accessed June 2018
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    World Cancer Research Fund International: Colorectal cancer statistics (2015). Accessed May 2019
  12. 12.
    Cancer statistics-specific cancers, statistics explained. Accessed June 2019
  13. 13.
    Eurostat, Statistics Explained. Accessed June 2019
  14. 14.
    Bun Kim, et al.: Quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with a history of abdomino-pelvic surgery: retrospective cohort study. Yonsei Med. J. 60(1), 73–78 (2019)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ngu, W.S., Rees, C.: Can technology increase adenoma detection rate? Ther. Adv. Gastroenterol. 11, 1–18 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eun-Jin Kim, et al.: A Korean experience of the use of boston bowel preparation scale: a valid and reliable instrument for colonoscopy—oriented research. Saudi J. Gastroenterol. 20(4), 219–224 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Douglas, K.R.: Colonoscopy withdrawal times and adenoma detection rates. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. (N Y) 3(8), 609–610 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manivannan, S., Wang, R., Trucco, E., Hood, A.: Automatic normal-abnormal video frame classification for colonoscopy. In: 2013 IEEE 10th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, (ISBI), San Francisco, CA, USA, 7–11 (2013).
  19. 19.
    Bashar, M.K., Kitasaka, T., Suenaga, Y., Mekada, Y., Mori, K.: Automatic detection of informative frames from wireless capsule endoscopy images. Med. Image Anal. 14(3), 449–70 (2010). Accessed June 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tajbakhsh, N., Chi, C., Sharma, H., Wu, Q., Gurudu, S.R., Liang, J.: Automatic assessment of image informativeness in colonoscopy. In: ABDI@MICCAI 2014, pp. 151–158 (2014)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanchez, F.J., Bernal, J., Sanchez-Montes, C., Rodriguez de Miguel, C., Fernandez-Esparrach, G.: Bright spot regions segmentation and classification for specular high-lights detection in colonoscopy videos. J. Mach. Vis. Appl. 1–20. Accessed July 2018
  22. 22.
    Kuznetsov, K., Lambert, R., Rey, J.F.: Narrow-band imaging: potential and limitations. Endoscopy 38, 76–81 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gono, K., Obi, T., Yamaguchi, M., et al.: Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J. Biomed. Opt. 9, 568–577 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sano, Y., et al.: Narrow-band imaging (NBI) magnifying endoscopic classification of colorectal tumors proposed by the Japan NBI expert team. Rev. Dig. Endosc. 28, 526–533 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sano, Y., Kobayashi, M., Kozu, T., et al.: Development and clinical application of a narrow band imaging (NBI) system with builtin narrow-band RGB filters. Stom. Intest. 36, 1283–1287 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sano, Y.: NBI story. Early Colorectal Cancer 11, 91–92 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kaltenbach, T., Friedland, S., Soetikno, R.: A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut J. 57, 1406–1412 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nagorni A., Bjelakovic G., Petrovic B.: Narrow band imaging versus conventional white light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 18 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Su M.Y., Hsu C.M., Ho Y.P., Chen P.C., Lin C.J., Chiu C.T.: Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and narrow-band imaging systems in differential diagnosis of neoplastic and nonneoplastic colonic polyps. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 101(12), 2711–2716. Accessed June 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    OLYMPUS, Narrow Band Imaging (NBI): A new wave of diagnostic possibilities.
  31. 31.
    Geetha, K., Rajan, C.: Automatic colorectal polyp detection in colonoscopy video frames. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 17(11), 4869–4873 (2016)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
  33. 33.
  34. 34.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer Science, Romanian AcademyIaşiRomania
  2. 2.University of Medicine and Pharmacy, “Gr. T. Popa”IașiRomania
  3. 3.Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepathology, “Sf. Spiridon”, Emergency HospitalIașiRomania

Personalised recommendations