Advertisement

Vaccination Strategies on a Robust Contact Network

  • Christopher Siu
  • Theresa MiglerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 881)

Abstract

Mathematical models of disease spreading are a key factor in ensuring that we are prepared to deal with the next epidemic. They allow us to predict how an infection will spread throughout a population, thereby allowing us to make intelligent choices when attempting to contain a disease. Whether due to a lack of empirical data, a lack of computational power, a lack of biological understanding, or some combination thereof, traditional models must make sweeping, unrealistic assumptions about the behavior of a population during an epidemic.

We present the results of granular epidemic simulations using a rich social network constructed from real-world interactions, demonstrating the effects of ten potential vaccination strategies. We confirm estimates by the WHO and the CDC regarding the virulence of measles-like diseases, and we show how representing a population as a temporal graph and applying existing graph metrics can lead to more effective interventions.

Keywords

Contact networks Epidemics Vaccination 

References

  1. 1.
    Borradaile, G., Migler, T., Wilfong, G.: Density decompositions of networks. In: Cornelius, S., Coronges, K., Gonçalves, B., Sinatra, R., Vespignani, A. (eds.) Complex Networks IX, pp. 15–26. Springer, Cham (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Measles|cases and outbreaks—CDC. Accessed 16 May 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190516082526/https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html
  3. 3.
    CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Measles|vaccination—CDC. Accessed 16 May 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190516074529/https://www.cdc.gov/measles/vaccination.html
  4. 4.
    CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention). Pinkbook—measles—epidemiology of vaccine-preventable disease—cdc. Accessed 14 May 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190514200016/https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/pinkbook/meas.html
  5. 5.
    Fenner, F., Henderson, D.A., Arita, I., Jezek, Z., Ladnyi, I.D.: Smallpox and its eradication. Number 6 in History of International Public Health. World Health Organization, Geneva (1988)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Frías-Martínez, E., Williamson, G., Frías-Martínez, V.: An agent-based model of epidemic spread using human mobility and social network information. In: 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 57–64, October 2011Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gates, B.: The next epidemic—lessons from Ebola. N. Engl. J. Med. 372(15), 1381–1384 (2015). PMID: 25853741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gemmetto, V., Barrat, A., Cattuto, C.: Mitigation of infectious disease at school: targeted class closure vs school closure. BMC Infect. Dis. 14(1), 695 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Granell, C., Mucha, P.J.: Epidemic spreading in localized environments with recurrent mobility patterns. Phys. Rev. E 97(5), 5 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kephart, J.O., White, S.R.: Directed-graph epidemiological models of computer viruses. In: Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Symposium on Research in Security and Privacy, pp. 343–359, May 1991Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rota, P.A., Moss, W.J., Takeda, M., de Swart, R.L., Thompson, K.M., Goodson, J.L.: Measles. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2, 16049 (2016). EP – 07CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seidman, S.B.: Network structure and minimum degree. Soc. Netw. 5(3), 269–287 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stopczynski, A., Pentland, A.‘Sandy’., Lehmann, S.: How physical proximity shapes complex social networks. Sci. Rep. 8(1), 17722 (2018)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stopczynski, A., Sekara, V., Sapiezynski, P., Cuttone, A., Madsen, M.M., Larsen, J.E., Lehmann, S.: Measuring large-scale social networks with high resolution. PLoS ONE 9(4), 1–24 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    WHO (World Health Organization). Measles vaccines: WHO position paper—April 2017. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 92(17), 205–228 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.California Polytechnic State UniversitySan Luis ObispoUSA

Personalised recommendations