Advertisement

Adaptive Network Modeling for Criterial Causation

  • Jan TreurEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 882)

Abstract

Propagation of activation of neurons depends on settings of a number of intrinsic characteristics of the network of neurons, such as synaptic connection strengths and excitability thresholds for neurons. These settings serve as criteria on the incoming signals for a neuron to get activated. As part of the plasticity of the neural processing these network characteristics also change over time. Such changes can be slow compared to propagation of activation, like in learning from a number of experiences, but they can also be fast, like in memory formation. From the informational perspective on the criteria, this can be considered a form of information formation, and the firing of neurons as driven by this information. This is called criterial causation. In this paper, an adaptive network model is presented modeling such criterial causation. Moreover, it is shown how criterial causation in the brain relates to the more general temporal factorisation principle for the world’s dynamics.

References

  1. 1.
    Abraham, W.C., Bear, M.F.: Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 19(4), 126–130 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ashby, W.R.: Design for a Brain. Chapman & Hall, London (1952). Revised edition 1960Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Schut, M.C., Treur, J.: Simulation and analysis of shared extended mind. Simul. J. (Soc. Model. Simul.) 81, 719–732 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosse, T., Jonker, C.M., Schut, M.C., Treur, J.: Collective representational content for shared extended mind. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7, 151–174 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chandra, N., Barkai, E.: A non-synaptic mechanism of complex learning: modulation of intrinsic neuronal excitability. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 154(2018), 30–36 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, A., Chalmers, D.: The extended mind. Analysis 58, 7–19 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cromwell, H.C., Tremblay, L., Schultz, W.: Neural encoding of choice during a delayed response task in primatestriatum and orbitofrontal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 236(6), 1679–1688 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Descartes, R.: The World, Ch 6: Description of a New World, and on the Qualities of the Matter of Which it is Composed (1634)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Foster, J.M.: Unit activity in the prefrontal cortex during delayed response performance: neuronal correlates of short-term memory. J. Neurophysiol. 36, 61–78 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hebb, D.O.: The Organization of Behavior: A Neuropsychological Theory. Wiley, Hoboken (1949)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hunter, W.S.: The delayed reaction in animals. Behav. Monogr. 2, 1–85 (1912)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim, J.: Philosophy of Mind. Westview Press (1996)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Laplace, P.S.: Philosophical Essays on Probabilities. Springer, New York (1995). Translated by A.I. Dale from the 5th French edition of 1825 (1825)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Levy, N.: Review of P.U. Tse – the neural basis of free will: criterial causation. Philos. Rev. 33(4), 331–333 (2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tinklepaugh, O.L.: Multiple delayed reaction with chimpanzees and monkeys. J. Comput. Psychol. 13, 207–243 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tollefsen, D.P.: From extended mind to collective mind. Cogn. Syst. Res. 7, 140–150 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Treur, J.: Temporal factorisation: a unifying principle for dynamics of the world and of mental states. Cogn. Syst. Res. 8(2), 57–74 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Treur, J.: Temporal Factorisation: Realisation of mediating state properties for dynamics. Cogn. Syst. Res. 8(2), 75–88 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45213-5CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Treur, J.: Multilevel network reification: representing higher order adaptivity in a network. In: Aiello, L., Cherifi, C., Cherifi, H., Lambiotte, R., Lió, P., Rocha, L. (eds.) Complex Networks and Their Applications VII, Proceedings of the Complex Networks 2018, vol. 1. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 812, pp. 635–651. Springer, Heidelberg (2018)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Treur, J.: The ins and outs of network-oriented modeling: from biological networks and mental networks to social networks and beyond. Trans. Comput. Coll. Intell. 32, 120–139 (2019)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Treur, J.: Design of a Software Architecture for Multilevel Reified Temporal-Causal Networks (2019). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333662169
  23. 23.
    Treur, J.: Modeling higher-order adaptivity of a network by multilevel network reification. Netw. Sci. (2019, in press)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling for Adaptive Networks: Designing Higher-Order Adaptive Biological, Mental and Social Network Models. Springer, Heidelberg (2020, to appear)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tse, P.U.: The Neural Basis of Free Will: Criterial Causation. MIT Press, Cambridge (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tse, P.U.: Two types of libertarian free will are realized in the human brain. In: Caruso, G.D., Flanagan, O.J. (eds.) Neuroexistentialism: Meaning, Morals, and Purpose in the Age of Neuroscience, pp. 248–290. Oxford University Press (2018)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    van Gelder, T.J., Port, R.F.: It’s about time: an overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In: Port, R.F., van Gelder, T. (eds.) Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, pp. 1–43. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social AI GroupVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations