Advertisement

Detection of Conflicts of Interest in Social Networks

  • Saadia AlbaneEmail author
  • Hachem Slimani
  • Hamamache Kheddouci
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 882)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a new approach to detect conflicts of interest (COIs) in social networks. We apply this approach to detect COIs in the review process of papers accepted in an international conference that is represented through a social network. This approach consists of extracting some special chains in the studied social network corresponding to conflict of interest cases where the source and target of each chain correspond to an author and a reviewer, respectively. To evaluate the proposed approach, we have conducted some experiments where a comparison with two methods in the literature has been done. The obtained results have shown some efficiency of the proposed approach.

Keywords

Conflicts of interest Chains Social network Review process International conference 

References

  1. 1.
    Aleman-Meza, B., Nagarajan, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Sheth, A.P., Arpinar, I.B., Ding, L., Kolari, P., Joshi, A., Finin, T.: Semantic analytics on social networks: experiences in addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 407–416. ACM (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aleman-Meza, B., Nagarajan, M., Ding, L., Sheth, A.P., Arpinar, I.B., Joshi, A., Finin, T.: Scalable semantic analytics on social networks for addressing the problem of conflict of interest detection. ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 2, 7 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aleman-Meza, B., Hakimpour, F., Arpinar, I.B., Sheth, A.P.: SwetoDblp ontology of computer science publications. J. Web Semant. 5(6), 151–155 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biaggioni, I.: Conflict of interest guidelines: an argument for disclosure. Pharm. Ther. 322, 324 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frachon, I.: Mediator 150 mg: Sous-titre censuré, postface de Rony Brauman, éditions-dialogues.fr (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Khan, M.S.: Exploring citations for conflict of interest detection in peerreview system. Int. J. Comput. Inf. Syst. Ind. Manag. Appl. 3 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klitzman, R., Chin, L.J., Rifai-Bishjawish, H., Kleinert, K., Leu, C.S.: Disclosures of funding sources and conflicts of interest in published HIV/AIDS research conducted in developing countries. J. Med. Ethics 36, 505–510 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ross, J.S., Madigan, D., Hill, K.P., Egilman, D.S., Wang, Y., Krumholz, H.M.: Pooled analysis of rofecoxib placebo-controlled clinical trial data: lessons for postmarket pharmaceutical safety surveillance. Arch. Intern. Med. 169, 1976–1985 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yan, S., Jin, J., Geng, Q., Zhao, Y., Huang, X.: Utilizing academic-network-based conflict of interests for paper reviewer assignment. Int. J. Knowl. Eng. 3, 65–73 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saadia Albane
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hachem Slimani
    • 1
  • Hamamache Kheddouci
    • 2
  1. 1.LIMED Laboratory, Faculty of Exact SciencesUniversity of BejaiaBejaiaAlgeria
  2. 2.Université de Lyon, CNRS, Université Lyon 1, LIRIS, UMR5205LyonFrance

Personalised recommendations