Advertisement

Investigating Saturation in Collaboration and Cohesiveness of Wikipedia Using Motifs Analysis

  • Anita ChandraEmail author
  • Abyayananda Maiti
Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 882)

Abstract

Wikipedia is a multilingual encyclopedia that works on the idea of virtual collaboration. Initially, its contents such as articles, editors and edits grow exponentially. Further growth analysis of Wikipedia shows slowdown or saturation in its contents. In this paper, we investigate whether two essential characteristics of Wikipedia, collaboration and cohesiveness also encounter the phenomenon of slowdown or saturation with time. Collaboration in Wikipedia is the process where two or more editors edit together to complete a common article. Cohesiveness is the extent to which a group of editors stays together for mutual interest. We employ the concept of network motifs to investigate saturation in these two considered characteristics of Wikipedia. We consider star motifs of articles with the average number of edits to study the growth of collaboration and 2 \(\times \) 2 complete bicliques or “butterfly” motifs to interpret the change in the cohesiveness of Wikipedia. We present the change in the count of the mentioned network motifs for the top 22 languages of Wikipedia upto May 2019. We observe saturation in collaboration while the linear or sudden rise in cohesiveness in most of the languages of Wikipedia. We therefore notice, although the contents of Wikipedia encounter natural limits of growth, the activities of editors are still improving with time.

Keywords

Natural limits of growth Bipartite networks Network motifs Wikipedia 

References

  1. 1.
    Almeida, R.B., Mozafari, B., Cho, J.: On the evolution of wikipedia. In: ICWSM. Citeseer, Princeton (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, L.M., Gadlin, H.: Collaboration and team science: from theory to practice. J. Invest. Med. 60(5), 768–775 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capocci, A., Servedio, V.D., Colaiori, F., Buriol, L.S., Donato, D., Leonardi, S., Caldarelli, G.: Preferential attachment in the growth of social networks: the internet encyclopedia wikipedia. Phys. Rev. E 74(3), 036116 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chandra, A., Maiti, A.: Modeling new and old editors’ behaviors in different languages of wikipedia. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems Engineering, pp. 438–453. Springer (2018)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gandica, Y., Carvalho, J., dos Aidos, F.S.: Wikipedia editing dynamics. Phys. Rev. E 91(1), 012824 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibbons, A., Vetrano, D., Biancani, S.: Wikipedia: Nowhere to grow (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Halfaker, A., Kittur, A., Riedl, J.: Don’t bite the newbies: how reverts affect the quantity and quality of wikipedia work. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, pp. 163–172. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jurgens, D., Lu, T.C.: Temporal motifs reveal the dynamics of editor interactions in wikipedia. In: Sixth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B.A., Chi, E.H.: He says, she says: conflict and coordination in wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 453–462. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mickan, S., Rodger, S.: Characteristics of effective teams: a literature review. Aust. Health Rev. 23(3), 201–208 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rotabi, R., Kamath, K., Kleinberg, J., Sharma, A.: Detecting strong ties using network motifs. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, pp. 983–992. International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee (2017)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sanei-Mehri, S.V., Sariyuce, A.E., Tirthapura, S.: Butterfly counting in bipartite networks. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 2150–2159. ACM (2018)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Saracco, F., di Clemente, R., Gabrielli, A., Squartini, T.: Detecting early signs of the 2007–2008 crisis in the world trade. Sci. Rep. 6, 30286 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simmons, B.I., Sweering, M.J., Schillinger, M., Dicks, L.V., Sutherland, W.J., Di Clemente, R.: bmotif: a package for motif analyses of bipartite networks. BioRxiv, p. 302356 (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suh, B., Convertino, G., Chi, E.H., Pirolli, P.: The singularity is not near: slowing growth of wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, p. 8. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Voss, J.: Measuring wikipedia (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wang, J., Fu, A.W.C., Cheng, J.: Rectangle counting in large bipartite graphs. In: 2014 IEEE International Congress on Big Data, pp. 17–24. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wilkinson, D.M., Huberman, B.A.: Assessing the value of coooperation in wikipedia. arXiv preprint cs/0702140 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yang, L., Wu, L., Liu, Y., Kang, C.: Quantifying tourist behavior patterns by travel motifs and geo-tagged photos from flickr. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 6(11), 345 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zlatić, V., Štefančić, H.: Model of wikipedia growth based on information exchange via reciprocal arcs. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 93(5), 58005 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology PatnaPatnaIndia

Personalised recommendations