Critical Analysis of Project Management Methodologies and Its Tools

  • Ramz Tsouli FathiEmail author
  • Mohammed Ammari
  • Laila Ben Allal
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 1104)


The Industrial world is in perpetual change which reflects the technological evolutions and behavioral of our society. Companies indeed have to face one large number of upheavals; so much at the level of the objectives to achieve (produced more and more Complexes processes, deadlines and always less important costs, strong pressure of the customers who want furthermore to be more actively involved in the development of a product, etc.)

To face these challenges, several methods and tools are developed and implemented in practice. One of them concerns project management methodologies.

During the last century, the development of project management has led to the advent of professional clusters that aim to the formalization and standardization of the practice of project management, its methods, processes, and tools.

After reviewing the literature, there are two of the main approaches of project management at a global level; Project Management Institute PMI & Projects In Controlled Environments PRINCE2.

This paper will provide an overview of the PRINCE2 and the PMI methods, and examine the strengths, the limits and differences between PMBOK and PRINCE2, to finally lead us to a holistic approach.


Project management Industrial systems PMBOK PRINCE2 


  1. 1.
    Simpson, W.D.: New Techniques in Software Project Management. Wiley, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dvir, D., Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J.: An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 21, 89–95 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Project Management Institute: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sixth Edition. Newtown SquareGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Office of Government Commerce: Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2™, TSO (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiemtoré, M.: Développement d’une approche de management des mégaprojets d’investissement favorisant la performance: intégration des facteurs négligés (2016)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Munns, A.K., Bjeirmi, B.F.: The role of project management in achieving project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 14(2), 81–87 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pinto, J.K., Mantel, Jr., S.J.: The causes of project failure. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 37(4), 269–276 (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siegelaub, J.M.: How PRINCE2 Can Complement PMBOK and Your PMP, Impact Strategies LLCGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D.: Risk management, project success, and technological uncertainty. R&D Manage. 32(2), 101–109 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baker, N.R., Green, S.G., Bean, A.S., Blank, W., Tadisina, S.K.: Sources of first suggestion and project success/failure in industrial research. In: Proceedings of Conference on the Management of Technological Innovation, Washington, D.C. (1983)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baker, B.N., Murphy, D.C., Fisher, D.: Factors affecting project success. In: Cleland, D., King, W.R. (Eds.) Project Management Handbook, 2nd Ed., pp. 902–919, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1988)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ramz Tsouli Fathi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mohammed Ammari
    • 1
  • Laila Ben Allal
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Sciences and TechniquesAbdelmalek Essaâdi UniversityTangierMorocco

Personalised recommendations