Advertisement

Reading Span Test for Brazilian Portuguese: An Eye-Tracking Implementation

  • Jaime A. RiascosEmail author
  • Arthur M. Brugger
  • Priscila Borges
  • Ana B. Arêas da Luz Fontes
  • Dante C. Barone
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 1068)

Abstract

The Reading Span Test (RST) is an instrument created for assessing verbal working memory capacity. Since its first version, the RST has undergone several modifications, including translations to different languages. This work aims to create a version of a standardized RST in Brazilian Portuguese. In addition, an implementation for eye-tracking devices on the RST is presented. Two reading conditions, aloud and silent, were compared to ensure optimal methodology for future studies. Significant differences were found between the two reading conditions, and distinct reading strategies were revealed by the eye-tracker.

Keywords

Reading Span Test Eye-tracking Working Memory Brazilian Portuguese 

Notes

Acknowledgement

Special thanks to FAURGS - Petrobras by the support through the Annelida research project (8147-7). The first author would like to thank to the SDAS Research Group (www.sdas-group.com) for its valuable support and the International Brain Research Organization (IBRO) for the support through the travel grant.

References

  1. Alptekin, C., Ercetin, G.: Eye movements in reading span tasks to working memory functions and second language reading. Eurasian J. Appl. Linguist. 1, 35–56 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baddeley, A.: Working memory and reading. In: Kolers, P.A., Wrolstad, M.E., Bouma, H. (eds.) Processing of Visible Language. NATOCS, vol. 13, pp. 355–370. Springer, Boston (1979).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0994-9_21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baddeley, A., Hitch, G.: Working memory. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.), vol. 8, pp. 47–89. Academic Press (1974).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1Google Scholar
  4. Bailer, C.: Working memory capacity and attention to form and meaning in EFL reading. Masters thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (2011)Google Scholar
  5. Carretti, B., Borella, E., Cornoldi, C., Beni, R.D.: Role of working memory in explaining the performance of individuals with specific reading comprehension difficulties: a meta-analysis. Learn. Ind. Differ. 19(2), 246–251 (2009).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassol Rigatti, P., Aras da Luz Fontes, A., Pereira Magagnin, K., Finger, I.: Traduo de teste de capacidade de memria de trabalho do ingls para o portugus brasileiro. Letrnica 10, 743 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-4301.2017.2.26434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Charchat Fichman, H., Uehara, E., Fernandes dos Santos, C.: New technologies in assessment and neuropsychological rehabilitation. Trends Psychol. 22(3), 539–553 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2014.3-01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clifton, C., et al.: Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 year legacy. J. Mem. Lang. 86, 1–19 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conway, A.R.A., Kane, M.J., Bunting, M.F., Hambrick, D.Z., Wilhelm, O., Engle, R.W.: Working memory span tasks: a methodological review and user’s guide. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12(5), 769–786 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Copeland, D.E., Radvansky, G.A.: Phonological similarity in working memory. Mem. Cogn. 29(5), 774–776 (2001).  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornoldi, C., Vecchi, T.: Visuo-spatial working memory and individual differences. Visuo-spatial Working Memory and Individual Differences, pp. 1–169 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203641583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowan, N.: What are the differences between long-term, short-term, and working memory? Prog. Brain Res. 169, 323–338 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalmaijer, E.S., Mathôt, S., Van der Stigchel, S.: PyGaze: an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behav. Res. Methods 46(4), 913–921 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daneman, M., Carpenter, P.A.: Individual differences in working memory and reading. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19(4), 450–466 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engbert, R., Kliegl, R.: Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention. Vision. Res. 43(9), 1035–1045 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00084-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engle, R., Kane, M., Tuholski, S.W.: Individual differences in working memory capacity and what they tell us about controlled attention, general fluid intelligence, and functions of the prefrontal cortex, pp. 102–134 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. Estivalet, G.L., Meunier, F.: The Brazilian Portuguese Lexicon: an instrument for psycholinguistic research. PLoS ONE 10(12), e0144016 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, N.P., Miyake, A.: The reading span test and its predictive power for reading comprehension ability. J. Mem. Lang. 51(1), 136–158 (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hart, S.G., Stavenland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, P.A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload, pp. 139–183. Elsevier (1988)Google Scholar
  20. Just, M.A., Carpenter, P.: A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol. Rev. 99(1), 122–149 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oberauer, K., Süß, H.-M.: Working memory and interference: a comment on Jenkins, Myerson, Hale, and Fry (1999). Psychon. Bull. Rev. 7(4), 727–733 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Over, E., Hooge, I., Vlaskamp, B., Erkelens, C.: Coarse-to-fine eye movement strategy in visual search. Vis. Res. 47(17), 2272–2280 (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Parsey, C.M., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M.: Applications of technology in neuropsychological assessment. Clin. Neuropsychol. 27(8), 1328–1361 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.834971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Slowiaczek, M.L., Clifton Jr., C.: Subvocalization and reading for meaning. J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 19(5), 573–582 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tomitch, L.: Individual differences in working memory capacity and the recall of predicted elements in the text (1999)Google Scholar
  26. Towse, J., Hitch, G., Hutton, U.: On the nature of the relationship between processing activity and item retention in children. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 82(2), 156–184 (2002).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(02)00003-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Turner, M.L., Engle, R.W.: Is working memory capacity task dependent? J. Mem. Lang. 28(2), 127–154 (1989).  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90040-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., Haverkort, M., Hugdahl, K.: A standard computerized version of the reading span test in different languages. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 24(1), 35–42 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.24.1.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Lans, R., Wedel, M., Pieters, R.: Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm. Behav. Res. Methods 43(1), 239–257 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Waters, G., Caplan, D.: The capacity theory of sentence comprehension: critique of Just and Carpenter. Psychol. Rev. 103, 761–772 (1996a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waters, G., Caplan, D.: The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A Hum. Exp. Psychol. 49(1), 51–75 (1996b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CONCYS, Institute of InformaticsFederal University Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil
  2. 2.University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.LABICO, School of Languages and LiteratureFederal University Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)Porto AlegreBrazil
  4. 4.SDAS Research GroupIbarraEcuador
  5. 5.Corporación Universitaria Autnoma de NariñoPastoColombia

Personalised recommendations