Advertisement

Mathematics Education in the Computational Age: Challenges and Opportunities

  • Kathryn HolmesEmail author
Conference paper
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 313)

Abstract

In the spirit of Jonathan Borwein’s opportunistic and inventive use of computers in the development of the field of Experimental Mathematics, this paper recommends a computational ‘turn’ in school mathematics. At a time when students are increasingly moving away from mathematics in the senior years of schooling, we need to reconsider the relevance of current mathematics curricula and traditional approaches to mathematics pedagogy. Computational applications are transforming the world that we live in and just as Experimental Mathematics challenged the foundations of the discipline of mathematics, computational approaches are also changing almost all traditional fields of study. By persisting with the teaching of manual computation in school mathematics, we are denying the current and future worlds of our students. By doing so, we risk increasing our students’ lack of interest in mathematics as it will progressively be seen as an historical curiosity of little relevance. This paper proposes some key questions for mathematics educators to consider in order to make mathematics more relevant and of interest to today’s students.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailey, D.H., Borwein, J.M.: Exploratory experimentation and computation. Not. AMS 58(10), 1410–1419 (2012)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hales, T., Adams, M., Bauer, G., Dang, T., Harrison, J., Hoang, L., Zumkeller, R.: A formal proof of the Kepler conjecture. Forum Math. Pi 5, e2 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2017.1
  3. 3.
    Borwein, J., Devlin, K.: The Computer As Crucible: An Introduction to Experimental Mathematics. AK Peters, Wellesley, MA (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    CESE: Why Aren’t Students Studying Higher Level Maths? How ATAR Scaling may Affect Maths Uptake. Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation, Sydney, NSW (2017)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Devine, A., Fawcett, K., Szucs, D., Dowker, A.: Gender differences in mathematics anxiety and the relation to mathematics performance while controlling for test anxiety. Behav. Brain Funct. 8, 33 (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rakes, C.: Challenging the status quo in mathematics: teaching for understanding. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/challenging-the-status-quo-in-mathematics-teaching-for-understanding-78660. Accessed on 22 June 2016
  7. 7.
    Rittle-Johnson, B., Schneider, M.: Developing conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics. In: Oxford Handbook of Numerical Cognition, pp. 1102–1118. OUP Oxford, Oxford (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rittle-Johnson, B., Alibali, M.W.: Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: does one lead to the other? J. Educ. Psychol. 91(1), 175 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rittle-Johnson, B.: Developing mathematics knowledge. Child Dev. Perspect. 11(3), 184–190 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Benton, L., Hoyles, C., Kalas, I., Noss, R.: Bridging primary programming and mathematics: some findings of design research in England. Digit. Exp. Math. Educ. 3(2), 115–138 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Prieto, E., Hickmott, D., Holmes, K., Berger, N.: Exploring mathematics using computational thinking: the scratchmaths pilot project. Paper presented at the 2018 MERGA conference, Albany, New Zealand (2018)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations